We address the topic of “pictorial depth” in cases of pictures that are unlike
photographic renderings. The most basic measure of “depth” is no doubt that of
depth order. We establish depth order through the pairwise
depth-comparison method, involving all pairs from a set of 49 fiducial points.
The pictorial space for this study was evoked by a capriccio (imaginary
landscape) by Francesco Guardi (1712–1793). In such a drawing pictorial space is
suggested by the artist through a small set of conventional depth cues. As a
result typical Western observers tend to agree largely in their visual awareness
when looking at such art. We rank depths for locations that are not on a single
surface and far apart in pictorial space. We find that observers resolve about
40 distinct depth layers and agree largely in this. From a previous experiment
we have metrical data for the same observers. The rank correlations between the
results are high. Perhaps surprisingly, we find no correlation between the
number of distinct depth layers and the total metrical depth range. Thus, the
relation between subjective magnitude and discrimination threshold fails to hold
for pictorial depth.
BerkeleyG,
1709An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision (Dublin,
UK: Aaron Rhames)
◂
2.
BradleyR
ATerryM
E, 1952“Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of
paired comparisons”Biometrika39324–345 ◂
3.
CohnJ,
1894“Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Gefühlsbetoningen der
Farben, Helligkeiten und ihrer Combinationen”Philosophische Studien10562–603 ◂
4.
CondorcetJ-A-N,
1785Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions
rendues à la pluralité des voix (Paris,
France: De l'Imprimerie
Royale) ◂
5.
CottH
B, 1957Adaptive Coloration in Animals
(London:
Methuen) ◂
6.
deCaniJ
S, 1969“Maximum likelihood paired comparison ranking by linear
programming”Biometrika56537–545 doi:10.1093/biomet/56.3.537
◂
7.
DenisM,
2000“Manifesto of the style nabi: Definition of neo-traditionalism
[Définition du néotraditionnisme in Art et Critique (1890)]”Art and the Academy in the Nineteenth Century
(Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers
University Press) ◂
8.
FagotL,
2001Picture Perception in Animals
(London: Psychology
Press) ◂
9.
FechnerG
T, 1860Elemente der Psychophysik II (Leipzig,
Germany: Thoemmes Press)
◂
10.
GibsonJ
J, 1950The Perception of the Visual World (Boston,
MA: Houghton Mifflin)
◂
11.
GombrichE
H, 1960Art and Illusion. A Study of the Psychology of Pictorial
Representation (London:
Phaidon Press) ◂
12.
GrofmanBFeldS
L, 1988“Rousseau's general will: A Condorcetian
perspective”The American Political Science Review82567–576 doi:10.2307/1957401 ◂
13.
HildebrandA,
1901Das Problem der Form in der bildenden Kunst
(Strassburg, France: Heitz
& Mündel) ◂
14.
IttelsonW
H, 1952The Ames Demonstrations in Perception
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press) ◂
15.
KemenyJ
G, 1959“Mathematics without numbers”Daedalus88577–591 ◂
LuceR
D, 1959Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis
(New York:
Wiley) ◂
27.
PirenneM
H, 1970Optics, Painting and Photography
(Cambridge, MA: Cambridge
University Press)
28.
RemageRThompsonW
A, 1966“Maximum-likelihood paired comparison rankings”Biometrika53143–149 ◂
29.
RousseauJ
J, 1984Of the Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right & Discourse
on Political Economy [Du contrat social ou Principes du droit politique
(1762)] (New York:
Harper & Row) ◂
30.
SchwartzT,
1972“Rationality and the myth of the maximum”Noûs697–117 ◂
31.
SlaterP,
1961“Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired
comparisons”Biometrika48303–312 ◂
32.
ThurstoneL
L, 1927“A law of comparative judgment”Psychological Review34273–286 doi:10.1037/h0070288 ◂
33.
ThurstoneL
L, 1929“The measurement of psychological value”Essays in Philosophy by Seventeen Doctors of Philosophy of the
University of Chicago (Chicago, IL:
Open Court) ◂
34.
ThurstoneL
L, 1959The Measurement of Values (Chicago,
IL: The University of Chicago
Press) ◂
35.
TitchenerE
B, 1901Experimental Psychology: I. Qualitative Experiments
(London: MacMillan and Co
Ltd) ◂
36.
TitchenerE
B, 1908Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention
(New York: The Macmillan
Company) doi:10.1037/10867-000 ◂
37.
TullockG,
1964“The irrationality of intransitivity”Oxford Economic Papers16401–406 ◂
38.
van DoornA
JWagemansJde RidderHKoenderinkJ
J, 2011“Space perception in pictures”Proceedings of SPIE7865786519–786519 doi:10.1117/12.882076
◂
39.
WagemansJvan DoornA JKoenderinkJ
J, 2011“Measuring 3D point configurations in pictorial
space”i-Perception277–111 doi:10.1068/i0420 ◂
40.
WicklerW,
1968Mimicry in Plants and Animals (New
York: McGraw-Hill)
◂
41.
WittgensteinL,
1921“Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung”Annalen der Naturphilosophie14 ◂
