Space constancy, the appearance of a stable visual world despite shifts of all visual input with each eye movement, has been explained historically with a compensatory signal (efference copy or corollary discharge) that subtracts the eye movement signal from the retinal image shift accompanying each eye movement. Quantitative measures have shown the signal to be too small and too slow to mediate space constancy unaided. Newer theories discard the compensation idea, instead calibrating vision to each saccadic target.
BellC, 1823“On the motions of the eyes, in illustration of the uses of the muscles and of the orbit”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society113166–186
2.
BridgemanBStarkL, 1991“Ocular proprioception and efference copy in registering visual direction”Vision Research311903–1913 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90185-8
3.
BridgemanBHendryDStarkL, 1975“Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements”Vision Research15719–722 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(75)90290-4
4.
BridgemanBvan der HeijdenA H CVelichkovskyB, 1994“Visual stability and saccadic eye movements”Behavioral and Brain Sciences17247–258 doi:10.1017/S0140525X00034361
5.
DeubelHBridgemanBSchneiderW X, 2004“Different effects of eyelid blinks and target blanking on saccadic suppression of displacement”Perception and Psychophysics66772–778
6.
GibsonJ J, 1966The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
7.
GrüsserO-JKrizicAWeissL-R, 1987“Afterimage movement during saccades in the dark”Vision Research27215–226 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(87)90184-2
8.
HelmholtzH, 1866 [1962] Handbuch der physiologischen OptikVolume 3 (Leipzig: Voss)
9.
IlgUBridgemanBHoffmanK-P, 1989“Influence of mechanical disturbance on oculomotor behavior”Vision Research29545–551 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(89)90041-2
10.
MorganC L, 1978“Constancy of egocentric visual direction”Perception and Psychophysics2361–68
11.
NagleMBridgemanBStarkL, 1980“Voluntary nystagmus, saccadic suppression, and stabilization of the visual world”Vision Research201195–1198 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90097-8
12.
O'ReganJ K, 1992“Solving the ‘real’ mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory”Canadian Journal of Psychology46461–488
13.
PurkinjeJ, 1825Beobachtungen und Versuche zur Physiologie der Sinne. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Sehens in subjectiver Hinsicht (Berlin: Reimer)
14.
RensinkAO'ReganJClarkJ, 1997“To see or not see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scene”Psychological Science8368–373 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x
15.
SherringtonC S, 1918“Observations on the sensual role of the proprioceptive nerve supply of the extrinsic ocular muscles”Brain41332–343 doi:10.1093/brain/41.3-4.332
16.
SimonsD J, 1996“In sight, out of mind: when object representation fails”Psychological Science7301–305 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00378.x
17.
SperryR, 1950“Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion”Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology43482–489 doi:10.1037/h0055479
18.
von HolstEMittelstaedtH, 1950“Das Reafferenzprinzip. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie”Naturwissenschaften27464–476 doi:10.1007/BF00622503
