There has been much interest in the neo-Foucauldian framework of governmentality as a way of understanding contemporary policy processes. In this paper I examine evidence from a case study of local sustainability indicators in the light of this framework. The role of indicators as a potential governmental technology is addressed, covering issues of their ability to objectify sustainability the scope for altered subjectivities, their positioning within central–local government relations, and the construction and responsibilisation of communities, particularly in urban regeneration contexts. I conclude that the use of indicators at the community level may tell us more about central–local relations within contemporary governance than about the construction of subjects and objects to enable governance with regard to sustainable development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambiente Italia2003European Common Indicators: Towards a Local Sustainability Profile (Ambiente Italia, Milan)
2.
AppaduraiA, 2002, “Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics”Public Culture1421–47
3.
BaldwinA, 2003, “The nature of boreal forest”Space and Culture6415–428
4.
BulkeleyH, 2006, “Urban sustainability: Learning from best practice?”Environment and Planning A381029–1044
5.
CherneyA, 2004, “Contingency and politics: The local government community safety officer role”Criminal Justice4115–128
6.
CleggSPitsisTRura-PolleyTMarosszekyM, 2002, “Governmentality matters: Designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects”Organization Studies23317–337
7.
DeanM, 1999Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (Sage, London)
8.
DEFRA, 2004Sustainable Development Indicators in Your PocketDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and National Statistics, London
9.
DryzekJ, 1997The Politics of the Earth (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
10.
FoucaultM, 1991, “Governmentality”, in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality Eds BurchellGGordonCMillerP, (Harvester Wheatsheaf, London) (lecture first delivered at the Collège de France in 1978) pp 87–104
11.
FoucaultM, 2004, “Interview with Roger-Pol Droit”Le Point 1 July, pages 82–93
12.
GoldmanM, 2001, “Constructing an environmental state: Eco-governmentality and other transnational practices of a ‘green’ World Bank”Social Problems48499–523
13.
Herbert-CheshireL, 2003, “Translating policy: Power and action in Australia's country towns”Sociologica Ruralis43454–473
14.
IlcanSBasokT, 2004, “Community government: Voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibilization of citizens”Citizenship Studies8 (2) 129–144
15.
IBRD, The World Bank2004The Little Green Data Book (The World Bank, Washington, DC)
16.
LemkeT, 2001, “‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality”Economy and Society30190–207
17.
LingayahSSommerF, 2001Communities Count: The LITMUS TestNew Economics Foundation and London Borough of Southwark, London
18.
Local Environment1999, “Sustainability indicators” special issue 4109–180
19.
Local Environment2003, “Local sustainability indicators” special issue 8581–666
20.
LSDC, 2004LSDC 2004 Report on London's Quality of Life IndicatorsLondon Sustainable Development Commission, Greater London Authority, London
21.
LucasKRossAFullerS, 2003What's in a Name? Local Agenda 21, Community Planning and Neighbourhood Renewal (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York)
22.
MacKinnonD, 2000, “Managerialism, governmentality and the state: A neo-Foucauldian approach to local economic governance”Political Geography19293–314
23.
MillerPRoseN, 1990, “Governing economic life”Economy and Society191–31
24.
MurdochJ, 1997, “The shifting territory of government: Some insights from the Rural White Paper”Area29109–118
25.
MurdochJ, 2004, “Putting discourse in its place: Planning, sustainability and the urban capacity study”Area3650–58
26.
Pastille Consortium, 2002Indicators into Action: Local Sustainability Indicator Sets in Their Context (London School of Economics, London)
27.
RacoM, 2003, “Governmentality, subject-building and the discourses and practices of devolution in the UK”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2875–95
28.
RacoMImrieR, 2000, “Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy”Environment and Planning A322187–2204
29.
RhodesR, 1997Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks)
30.
RoseNMillerP, 1992, “Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government”The British Journal of Sociology43173–205
31.
RydinY, 2003Conflict, Concensus and Rationality in Environmental Planning (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
RydinYSommerF, 2000The LITMUS Project: Final Monitoring and Evaluation Report report by London School of Economics to London Borough of Southwark, London
33.
RydinYHolmanNHandsVSommerF, 2003, “Incorporating sustainable development concerns into an urban regeneration project: How politics can defeat procedures”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management46545–561
34.
SchofieldB, 2002, “Partners in power: Governing the self-sustaining community”Sociology3663–683
35.
SmartB, 1985Michel Foucault (Routledge, London)
36.
SommerF, 2000, “Monitoring and evaluating outcomes of community involvement: The LITMUS experience”Local Environment5483–492
37.
VincentR, 2002, “Myths of discipline: Beyond the governmentalizing of law in Lower Shepton”Anthropological Theory2307–322
38.
Vincent-JonesP, 2002, “Values and purpose in government: Central–local relations in regulatory perspective”Journal of Law and Society2927–55
39.
WarburtonJSmithJ, 2003, “Out of the generosity of your heart: Are we creating active citizens through compulsory volunteer programmes for young people in Australia?”Social Policy and Administration37772–786
40.
WattsM, 2002, “Green capitalism, green governmentality”American Behavioral Scientist451313–1317
