In Britain, current interest in social balance has arisen partly as a response to increased management difficulties in social housing and partly in response to the concepts of the underclass and social exclusion. Social balance is now endorsed in some, but not all, the relevant urban policy statements of the New Labour government elected in 1997. A modified form of poststructural discourse analysis offers the best way of understanding the term and its implications. The approach focuses on different levels of social reality—the level of a national policy, the level of management and estate upgrading, and the level of the social experience of residents. In doing this, the approach reveals the varied and occasionally contradictory meanings of the term ‘social balance’; it highlights the increasingly common attempts by social housing agencies to control the characteristics of their tenants; and it enables a sceptical assessment of the practical significance of mixed housing estates for poor individuals and households.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllmendingerPThomasH, 1998Urban Planning and the British New Right (Routledge, London).
2.
AscherF, 1995Métapolis ou l'avenir des villes [Metapolis or the future of cities] (Éditions Odile Jacob, Paris).
3.
AtkinsonR, 1999, “Discourses of partnership and empowerment”Urban Studies3659–72.
4.
AtkinsonRKintreaK, 1998, “Reconnecting excluded communities: The neighbourhood impacts of owner-occupation”, Scottish Homes, Thistle House, 91 Haymarket Terrace, Edinburgh EH12 5HE.
5.
BalchinP, 1995Housing Policy: An Introduction3rd edition (Routledge, London).
6.
BoudonP, 1972Lived-in Architecture: Le Corbusier's Pessac Revisited translated by OnnG, (Lund Humphries, London); preface by LefèbvreH.
7.
BridgeG, 1990Gentrification, Class and Community: A Study of Sands End, Fulham PhD thesis, Nuffield College, Oxford University, Oxford.
8.
BurrowsR, 1997, “Contemporary patterns of residential mobility in relation to social housing in England”, The Centre for Housing Policy, University of York, York.
9.
BurrowsRRhodesD, 1998, “Patterns of neighbourhood dissatisfaction in England”, Findings 118, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, The Homestead, 40 Water End, York Y03 6LP.
Capita Management Consultancy, 1996An Evaluation of Six Early Estate Action SchemesDepartment of the Environment (The Stationery Office, London).
12.
CareyLMapesR, 1972The Sociology of Planning: A Study of Social Activity on New Housing Estates (Batsford, London).
13.
ChoayF, 1969The Modern City: Planning in the 19th Century translation of an undated original (Studio Vista, London).
14.
ChoayF, 1995, “Le règne de l'urbain et la mort de la ville” [Preeminance of the urban and the death of the town], in Chronique des Idées Contemporaines [A chronicle of contemporary ideas] Ed. RomanJ, (Bréal, Rosny) pp 366–368.
15.
ColeIFurbeyR, 1994The Eclipse of Council Housing (Routledge, London).
16.
ColeIShayerS, 1998a, “Beyond housing investment: Regeneration sustainability and the role of housing associations”, Sheffield Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
17.
ColeIShayerS, 1998b, “Mixed tenure housing initiative-a route to community diversity and social inclusion?”, Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
18.
ColeIDixonLReidB, 1998, “Estate profiling: A pathway to mixed communities?”, findings of the Housing Corporation policy seminar held at Ashford, Kent, copy available from Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
19.
ColeIGidleyGRitchieCSimpsonDWishartB, 1997, “Creating communities or welfare housing? A study of housing association developments in Yorkshire/Humberside”Chartered Institute of Housing, 9 White Lion Street, Islington, London N1 9XJ.
20.
DavoudiSAtkinsonR, 1999, “Social exclusion and the British planning system”Planning Practice and Research14(2) 225–236.
21.
DeleuzeG, 1992, “Postscript on the societies of control”October59(4) 3–7.
22.
DeleuzeG, 1997, “The rise of the social”, in The Policing of Families Ed. DonzelotJ, (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp ix–xvii.
23.
DETR, 1998a, “Urban Task Force: Prospectus”, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU; available at http://www.regeneration.detr.gov.uk/urbantask98.
24.
DETR, 1998b, “Planning and affordable housing”, Circular 1998/06, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London).
25.
DETR, 1999, “National strategy for neighbourhood renewal”, Report 5 of Policy Action Team, Housing Management, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU.
26.
DoE, 1989, “Draft Planning Policy Guidance. Note 3: Housing”, Department of the Environment; now Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU.
27.
DoE, 1992, “Planning Policy Guidance: Housing PPG3 (revised)”, Department of the Environment; now Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU.
28.
DonzelotJ, 1997The Policing of Families (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
29.
FaircloughN, 1985, “Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis”Journal of Pragmatics9739–763.
30.
FaircloughN, 1992Discourse and Social Change (Polity Press, Cambridge).
31.
FarthingSLambertC, 1996, “Land planning and housing associations”, Source Report 10, The Housing Corporation, 7–12 Waverley House, Noel Street, London W1V 4BA.
32.
FearnleyR, 1998, “Stratford City Challenge Year Four Report”, CIS Commentary Series 70, Centre for Institutional Studies, University of East London, London.
33.
FootM, 1975Aneurin Bevan 1945–1969 (Granada, St Albans, Herts).
FosterJHopeT, 1993, “Housing community and crime: The impact of the Priority Estates Project”, Research Study 131, Home Office Research and Planning Unit (HMSO, London).
36.
FoucaultM, 1984, “Truth and power”, in The Foucault Reader Ed. RabinowP, (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx) pp 51–75.
37.
GoodchildB, 1990, “Planning and the modern/postmodern debate”The Town Planning Review61119–138.
38.
GoodchildB, 1997Housing and the Urban Environment (Blackwell, Oxford).
39.
GriffithsMParkerJSmithRStirlingTTrottT, 1996Community Lettings: Local Allocations Policies in Practice (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York).
40.
HallP, 1997, “Regeneration policies for peripheral estates: Inward- and outward-looking approaches”Urban Studies34873–890.
41.
HeronEDwyerP, 1999, “Doing the right thing: Labour's attempt to forge a new welfare deal between the individual and the state”Social Policy and Administration33(1) 91–104.
JacobsK, 1999, “Conclusion to special edition: Discourse and urban change”Urban Studies36203–213.
44.
JuppB, 1999Living Together: Community Life on Mixed Tenure Estates (Demos, London).
45.
KintreaKGibbKKeoghanMMunroMMcGregorAHermansenC, 1996, “An evaluation of GRO grants for owner occupation”, Central Research Unit, Scottish Office; copy available from The Scotland Office, 1 Melville Crescent, Edinburgh EH3 7HW.
46.
KleinmanMWhiteheadC, 1999, “Housing regeneration: The problem or the solution”National Institute Economic Reviewnumber 170, 78–86.
47.
KuperL, 1953, “Blueprint for living together”, in Living in Towns Ed. KuperL, (Cresset Press, London) pp 1–202.
48.
LefèbvreH, 1985Préface, Pessac de le Corbusier [Preface to le Corbusier's Pessac] (Bordas, Paris); first published 1969 (Dunod, Paris).
49.
MacEwenM, 1991Housing Race and Law: The British Experience (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
50.
MurrayC, 1994, “Underclass: The crisis deepens”, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
51.
NixonJHunterCShayerS, 1999, “The use of legal remedies by social landlords to deal with neighbour nuisance”, paper H8, Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
52.
North British Housing Association, 1999, “How to apply for a home”, North British Housing Association, 4 The Pavillions, Preston PR2 2YB.
53.
OrlansH, 1952, “Stevenage: A sociological study of a new town” (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT).
54.
OsborneTRoseN, 1999, “Governing cities: Notes on the spatialisation of virtue”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17737–760.
55.
PageD, 1993Building for Communities: A Study of New Housing Association Estates (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York).
PageDBoughtonR, 1997, “Mixed tenure housing estates”, Notting Hill Home Ownership, 27 Hammersmith Grove, London W6 0JL.
58.
PahlR E, 1970Patterns of Urban Life (Longman, Harlow, Essex).
59.
PawsonHKearnsA, 1998, “Difficult to let housing association stock”Housing Studies13391–414.
60.
PawsonHKearnsAKeoghanMMalcolmJMorganJ, 1997, “Managing voids and difficult to let property”, The Housing Corporation, 7–12 Waverley House, Noel Street, London W1V 4BA.
61.
Perri 6, 1997Escaping Poverty: From Safety Nets to Networks of Opportunity (Demos, London).
62.
PowerA, 1984, “Local housing management: A Priority Estates Project survey”, Department of the Environment; now Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU.
RobinsonF, 1997, “The city challenge experience: A review of the development and implementation of Newcastle City Challenge”, Newcastle City Challenge West End Partnership Ltd, Newcastle.
66.
SarkissianW, 1976, “The idea of social mix in town planning: A historical review”Urban Studies13231–246.
