By using a framework of spatial categories to illuminate social change, scale analysis intersects with a series of arguments that have been put forward over the years regarding the relationship between society and space. The coherence of scale analysis and its contribution to our understanding of this relationship are examined here, with a focus particularly upon the influential writings of Swyngedouw. It is argued that these writings are haunted by a spatial fetishism that has deconstructive consequences, confounding the distinction between society and space upon which their composition depends. But this conclusion points (through a sort of ‘spectral logic’) towards a wider deconstruction, which suggests that the distinction between these terms or realms is itself the product of a kind of ‘scaling’. Despite its centrality to the development of geographical thought, and its congruence with other dualisms such as culture/nature, the juxtaposition of society and space remains the unexamined ground of much contemporary writing. Recent efforts by feminists and others to rework the notion of ‘space’ and indeed of ‘society’ would benefit from addressing these together in their articulation through the in-between-ness of scale.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ, 1973, “Ideology in geography: An introduction”Antipode5(3) 1–6.
2.
BannetE T, 1989Structuralism and the Logic of Dissent: Barthes, Derrida, Foucault, Lacan (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
3.
BluntARoseG (Eds), 1994Writing Women and Space: Colonial and Postcolonial Geographies (Guilford Press, London).
4.
BrennerN, 1998, “Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16459–481.
5.
BrennerN, 2000, “The urban question as a scale question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(2) 361–378.
6.
BrennerN, 2001, “The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration”Progress in Human Geography25591–614.
CastreeN, 2002, “From spaces of antagonism to spaces of engagement”, in Critical Realism and Marxism Eds BrownAFleetwoodSRobertsJ M (Routledge, London) pp 187–214.
10.
CollingeC, 1999, “Self-organisation of society by scale: A spatial reworking of regulation theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17557–574.
11.
CoxK, 1998, “Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics”Political Geography171–23.
12.
CoxKMairA, 1991, “From localised social structures to localities as agents”Environment and Planning A23197–213.
13.
De LauretisT, 1987Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film and Fiction (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
14.
DerridaJ, 1973Speech and Phenomena (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).
15.
DerridaJ, 1976Of Grammatology (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
16.
DerridaJ, 1978Writing and Difference (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
DerridaJ, 1982Margins of Philosophy (Harvester Press, Hemel Hempstead, Herts).
20.
DerridaJ, 1987The Truth in Painting (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
21.
DerridaJ, 1988Limited Inc (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).
22.
DerridaJ, 1994Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International (Routledge, London).
23.
FoucaultM, 1986, “Of other spaces”Diacritics16 (Spring) 22–27.
24.
Gibson-GrahamJ K, 1996The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy (Blackwell, Oxford).
25.
GroszE, 1995Space, Time and Perversion (Routledge, London).
26.
GroszE, 2002, “A politics of imperceptibility: A response to ‘Anti-racism, multiculturalism and the ethics of identification’”Philosophy and Social Criticism28463–472.
27.
HamnettC, 1979, “Area-based explanations: A critical appraisal”, in Social Problems and the City: Geographical Perspectives Eds HerbertD TSmithD M (Open University Press, Buckingham, Bucks) pp 244–260.
28.
HarveyD, 1973Social Justice and the City (Edward Arnold, London).
29.
HerodAWrightM (Eds), 2002Geographies of Power: Placing Scale (Blackwell, Oxford).
30.
HowittR, 2002, “Scale and the other: Levinas and geography”Geoforum33299–313.
31.
JessopB, 1994, “The transition to post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian workfare state”, in Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State Eds BurrowsRLoaderB (Routledge, London) pp 13–37.
32.
JessopB, 2001, “The political economy of scale”, in Globalization and Regionalization: The Building of Cross-border Regions Eds SumN LPerkmannM (Palgrave, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 25–49.
33.
KurtzH, 2002, “The politics of environmental justice as the politics of scale: St. James Parish Louisiana, and the Shintech siting controversy”, in Geographies of Power: Placing Scale Eds HerodAWrightM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 249–273.
34.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford).
35.
LlewelynJ, 1986Derrida on the Threshold of Sense (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
36.
LonghurstR, 1997, “(Disembodied geographies”Progress in Human Geography21486–501.
37.
MarstonS, 2000, “The social construction of scale”Progress in Human Geography24219–242.
38.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
39.
MasseyD, 1985, “New directions in space”, in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 9–19.
40.
MasseyD, 1992, “Politics and space/time”New Left Reviewnumber 196, 65–84.
41.
MasseyD, 1993, “Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place”, in Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change Eds BirdJCurtisBPutnamTTicknerL (Routledge, London) pp 59–69.
42.
MasseyD, 1999, “Spaces of politics”, in Human Geography Today Eds MasseyDAllenJSarreP (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 279–294.
43.
MerryfieldA, 1995, “Lefebvre. Anti-logos and Nietzsche: An alternative reading of The Production of Space”Antipode27294–303.
44.
MillsS, 1996, “Gender and colonial space”Gender, Place and Culture3(2) 125–147.
45.
Price-ChalitaP, 1994, “Spatial metaphor and the politics of empowerment: Mapping a place for feminism and postmodernism in geography?”Antipode26236–254.
46.
RelphE, 1976Place and Placelessness (Pion, London).
47.
RoseG, 1993Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge (Polity Press, Cambridge).
48.
RoseG, 1996, “As if the mirrors could bleed”, in Bodyspace: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality Ed. DuncanN (Routledge, London) pp 56–74.
49.
RoseG, 1999, “Performing space”, in Human Geography Today Eds MasseyDAllenJSarreP (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 279–294.
50.
SaundersP, 1986Social Theory and the Urban Question2nd edition (Hutchinson Education, London).
51.
SayerA, 1985, “The difference that space makes”, in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 49–66.
52.
SayerA, 2000Realism and Social Science (Sage, London).
53.
SchaeferF K, 1953, “Exceptionalism in geography: A methodological examination”, in Annals of the Association of American Geographers43226–249.
54.
SheppardEMcMasterB (Eds), 2003Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society and Method (Blackwell, Oxford).
55.
ShieldsR, 1999, Lefebvre, Love and Struggle: Spatial Dialectics (Routledge, London).
56.
SmithN, 1984Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford).
57.
SmithN, 1992, “Geography, difference and the politics of scale”, in Postmodernism and the Social Sciences Eds DohertyJGrahamEMalekM (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 57–79.
58.
SojaE W, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London).
59.
SojaE W, 1996Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-imagined Places (Blackwell, Oxford).
60.
SwyngedouwE A, 1992a, “The Mammon quest: Glocalisation, interspatial competition and monetary order: The construction of new spatial scales”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe: The Global – Local Interplay and Spatial Development Strategies Eds DunfordMKafkalasG (Belhaven Press, London) pp 39–67.
61.
SwyngedouwE A, 1992b, “Review: Henri Lefebvre's The Production of Space”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research17317–318.
62.
SwyngedouwE A, 1996, “Reconstructing citizenship, the re-scaling of the state and the new authoritarianism: Closing the Belgium mines”Urban Studies331499–1521.
63.
SwyngedouwE A, 1997a, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalisation’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK (Guilford Press, London) pp 137–166.
64.
SwyngedouwE A, 1997b, “Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics”, in Geographies of Economies Eds LeeRWillsJ (Arnold, London) pp 167–176.
65.
SwyngedouwE A, 2000, “Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1863–76.
66.
SwyngedouwE A, 2003, “Scaled geographies: Nature, place, and the contested politics of scale”, in Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society and Method Eds SheppardEMcMasterB (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 129–153.
67.
TaylorP, 1982, “A materialist framework for political geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series715–34.
68.
UllmanE, 1980Geography as Spatial Interaction (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA).
69.
WhittleseyD, 1945, “The horizon of geography”Annals of the Association of American Geographers35(1) 1–36.
