Many theorists of urban modernity have suggested that modernisation accelerates the pace of life, resulting in faster and more frenetic cities. In this paper we argue that this tells only part of the story, as where there is speed there is also slowness. The mid-20th-century redevelopment of Coventry in the United Kingdom serves to illustrate this: the technocentric conceptions of timespace that became dominant in this period bequeathed a city that sped up for some, but slowed down for others. These differential mobilities indicate the speed politics underpinning the redevelopment of Coventry in the postwar era, with the city centre increasingly moving to the rhythms imposed by a bureaucratic elite. Noting these rhythms were nonetheless subject to interruptions that undermined this spatial and temporal order, we conclude that geographers must be attentive to the uneven production of both space and time to grasp fully the ambivalence of modernity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminAThriftN, 2002Cities: Reimagining the Urban (Polity Press, Cambridge).
2.
Architect and Building News 1941, “Coventry: A plan for the city centre”, number 165, pages 88–195.
AttfieldJ, 1989, “Inside pram town: A case study of Harlow house interiors, 1951–61”, in View from the Interior: Feminism, Women and Design Eds AttfieldJKirkhamP, (The Women's Press, London) pp 215–237.
5.
BeckmannJ, 2001, “Automobility—a social problem and theoretical conception, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19593–607.
6.
BenjaminW, 1999The Arcades Project translated by EilandHMcLaughinK, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
7.
BermanM, 1983All That is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity (Verso, New York).
8.
Building 1951, “The face of Coventry”, January, page 8.
9.
BurnsW, 1959British Town Centres (Leonard Hill, London).
10.
CastellsM, 1996The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age—Economy, Society, and Culture Volume I (Blackwell, Oxford).
1948b, “Broadgate Island not a public park”, 26 May, page 49.
20.
1950, “Making way for new shops”, 14 March, page 7.
21.
1953a, “New era for architecture in Coventry”, 30 April.
22.
1953b, Letter From ‘Jay Walker’, 1 August, page 4.
23.
1953c, “Landmark in the precinct”, 14 August, page 8.
24.
1953d, “Coventry natives attack plan of new city”, 22 May, page 3.
25.
1953e, “Residents make own sports field”, 9 March, page 3.
26.
1954a, “Streamline service for buyers”, 30 September, page 11.
27.
1954b, “Café for teenagers who will not join clubs”, 15 April, page 3.
28.
1955a, “Keep left on pavements suggestion gets a cool reception”, 1 July, page 5.
29.
1955b, Anonymous letter, 16 July, page 5.
30.
1958a, “Drapers' Hall: Tree plan attacked”, 12 March, page 2.
31.
1958b, Letter from ‘Robert Hudson’, 12 March, page 8.
32.
1958c, Letter from ‘Robert Wiffratt’, 12 March, page 8.
33.
1959, “Another problem for city council—shoppers complain Smithfield Way is isolated”, 23 January, page 7.
34.
1960, “Locarno poses ‘how to get there’ problem”, 29 August, page 11.
35.
Coventry Standard 1940, “Plans for new Coventry”, 11 May, page 6.
36.
CrangM, 2000, “Public space, urban space and electronic space: Would the real city please stand up?”, Urban Studies37301–317.
37.
CresswellT, 2001, “The production of mobilities”, New Formations4311–25.
38.
DonaldJ, 1999Imagining the Modern City (Athlone, London).
39.
DrakeM, 1995, “The corruption of vision: The postwar reconstruction of Coventry”, paper presented to the Annual Conference of the BSA, University of Leicester, Leicester.
40.
FaireL, forthcoming, “Youth leisure in Coventry and Nottingham 1918–1960”, Midland History.
41.
FinneganR, 1998Tales of the City: A Study of Narrative and Urban Life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
42.
FordE H, 1948, “Progress of redevelopment and development in Coventry”, Journal of the Sanitary Institute390–97.
43.
Gardner-MedwinR, 1955, “A threat to pedestrians”, The Architect's Journal 15 September.
GibsonD, 1941, “Some matters concerning post-war reconstruction”, Architectural Association Journal56648–655.
46.
GibsonD, 1943, “The reconstruction of towns”, in Creative Demobilisation: Case Studies for National Planning Ed. GutkindE A, (Kegan Paul, London) pages 205–213.
GreedC, 1994Women and Planning: Creating Gendered Realities (Routledge, London).
51.
HallP, 1988Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
52.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
53.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Postmodernity (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
54.
HaugW F, 1986Critique of Commodity Aesthetics: Appearance, Sexuality and Advertising in Capitalist Society (Polity Press, Cambridge).
55.
HighmoreB, 2002a, “Streetlife in London: Towards a rhythmanalysis of London in the late nineteenth century”, New Formations47171–193.
56.
HighmoreB, 2002bEveryday Life and Cultural Theory (Routledge, London).
57.
HolfordW G, 1958, “Coventry: Urban and suburban”, Architectural Design28480–481.
58.
HolstonJ, 1989The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasilia (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL).
59.
HubbardPFaireLLilleyK, 2003a, “Contesting the modern city: Reconstruction and everyday life in post-war Coventry”, Planning Perspectives18 (4) 377–397.
60.
HubbardPFaireLLilleyK, 2003b, “Remembering post-war reconstruction: Modernism and city planning in Coventry 1940–1962”, Planning History247–20.
61.
HubbardPFaireLLilleyK, 2003c, “Memorials to modernity? Public art in The City of the Future Landscape Research28147–169.
62.
InnisH A, 1952Concepts of Time (Toronto University Press, Toronto).
63.
Johnson-MarshallP, 1966Rebuilding Cities (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh).
64.
KernS, 1983The Culture of Time and Space 1880–1918 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
65.
KwinterS, 2002Architectures of Time (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
66.
LancasterBMasonT, (Eds), 1986Life and Labour in a Twentieth Century City: The Experience of Coventry (Cryfield, Coventry).
67.
LangbauerL, 1993, “The city, the everyday and boredom: The case of Sherlock Holmes”, differences580–120.
68.
Le Corbusier, 1922The City of Tomorrow and its Planning (Architectural Press, London).
69.
Le Corbusier, 1933La Ville Radieuse (Éditions d'architecture d'aujourd'hui, Boulogne).
70.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford).
71.
LefebvreH, 1995Introduction to Modernity (Verso, New York).
72.
LilleyK, 1999, “Modern visions of the medieval city: Competing conceptions of urbanism in European civic design”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26427–446.
73.
LogieG, 1962, “The lessons of Coventry”, Architect and Building News 11 July, pages 43–49.
74.
LukeTÓTuathailG, 2000, “The spatiality of war, speed and vision in the work of Paul Virilio”, in Thinking Space Eds CrangMThriftN, (Routledge, London).
75.
Midland Daily Telegraph.
76.
1936, “Editorial”, 12 March, page 7.
77.
1940a, “Transport problems of a modern city”, 8 May, page 3.
78.
1940b, “The Coventry of the future is in the making”, 11 May, page 13.
79.
1941, “A splendid city will arise”, 7 January.
80.
MillerR, 1999Researching Life Stories and Family Histories (Sage, London).
81.
MooneyG, 1998, “Changing place”, in Images of the Street Ed. FyfeN, (Routledge, London) pp 31–44.
82.
OgbornM, 1998Spaces of Modernity: London's Geographies 1680–1780 (Guilford Press, New York).
83.
PevsnerN, 1951, “Canons of criticism”Architectural Review January, 3–6.
84.
RichardsJ M, 1952, “Coventry”Architectural Review January, 3–7.
85.
RobinsK, 1995, “Global cities: Real time, and byzantine”, City740–46.
86.
RobinsKWebsterF, 1988, “Cybernetic capitalism, information, technology and everyday life”, in The Political Economy of Information Eds MoskoVWaskoJ, (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) pp 45–75.
87.
RossK, 1994Fast Cars, Clean Bodies (Verso, New York).
88.
RussellC, 2002, “Against dead time”, Time and Society11 (2/3) 193–208.
89.
SchivelbushW, 1988Disenchanted Night: The Industrialisation of Light in the Nineteenth Century (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
90.
SchlörJ, 1998Nights in the Big City (Reaktion Books, London).
91.
ScottS C, 1998Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
92.
SharpT, 1952, “Building Britain: 1941”, Town Planning Review23206–210.
93.
ShieldsR, 1999Lefebvre, Love and Struggle (Routledge, London).
94.
SpenceB, 1951Phoenix at Coventry (Architect's Association, London).
95.
TaylorP, 1997Modernities (Routledge, London).
96.
TetlowJGossA, 1968Homes, Towns and Traffic (Butterworth, Cambridge).
97.
ThompsonE P, 1991Customs in Common (Merlin, London).
98.
ThriftN, 1996Spatial Formations (Sage, London).
99.
ThriftN, 2000a, “Not a straight line, but a curve”, in City Visions Ed. BellD, (Longman, Harlow, Essex) pp 233–257.
100.
ThriftN, 2000b, “Performing cultures in the new economy”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers90674–692.
101.
TiratsooN, 1990Reconstruction, Affluence and Labour Politics: Coventry 1945–60 (Routledge, London).
102.
TrippH A, 1938Road Traffic and its Control (Architectural Association, London).
103.
VirilioP, 1986Speed and Politics translated by PolizottiMark, (Semiotext(e), New York).
104.
VirilioP, 1996Cybermonde (Textual, Paris).
105.
VirilioP, 1997, “The overexposed city” in Rethinking Architecture Ed. LeachN, (Routledge, London) pp 381–390.
106.
WardS V, 1994Planning and Urban Change (Paul Chapman, London).
107.
WilsonE, 1997, “Looking backward: Nostalgia and the city”, in Imagining Cities Eds WestwoodSWilliamsJ, (Routledge, London) pp 127–139.
