The 2001 foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the United Kingdom resulted in the popularisation of the concept of biosecurity. At its most basic, biosecurity refers to simple cleansing and disinfecting, but during the FMD epidemic it became associated with a powerful system of surveillance. We characterise surveillance as a thing in itself, a mode of ordering that can be added to others. The establishment and maintenance of categories are fundamental to the practice of surveillance, but social studies of surveillance have not yet fully realised the way such categorisation operates within the nonhuman and the spatial. Strange materialities are those things which do not quite belong within a particular order. We examine the actions of surveillance in the world of strange materialities that was the FMD epidemic. Here we see that surveillant practices acted on the nonhuman FMD virus by constructing territories to control humans. Surveillance seems to proceed as the translation of a worldview (a system of categorisation) into materiality and we conclude with some thoughts on what this may mean for geographical studies of technical, biological, and human materialities in which surveillant processes are at work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkrichMLatourB, 1992, “A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and non-human assemblages”, in Shaping Technology/Building Society Eds BijkerWLawJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 259–264
2.
AndersonI, 2002Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned InquiryThe Stationery Office, London)
3.
BallK S, 2001, “Situating workplace surveillance: ethics and computer based performance monitoring”Ethics and Information Technology3211–223
4.
BallK S, 2002, “Elements of surveillance: a new framework and future research directions”Information, Communication and Society5573–590
5.
BarthF (Ed.), 1969Ethnic Groups and BoundariesWaveland Press, Long Grove, IL)
6.
BarthF, 2000, “Boundaries and connections”, in Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values Ed. CohenA P (Routledge, London) pp 17–34
7.
BinghamN, 1996, “Object-ions: from technological determinism towards geographies of relations”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14635–657
8.
BinghamNThriftN, 2000, “Some new instructions for travellers: the geographies of Bruno Latour and Michel Serres”, in Thinking Space Eds CrangMThriftN (Routledge, London) pp 281–301
9.
BogardW, 1996The Simulation of Surveillance: Hypercontrol in Telematic SocietiesCambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
BowkerGStarS L, 1999Sorting Things Out: Classification and its ConsequencesMIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
11.
CastreeN, 2003, “Environmental issues: relational ontologies and hybrid politics”Progress in Human Geography27203–211
12.
CohenA P (Ed.), 2000Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested ValuesRoutledge, London)
13.
CurryM R, 1998Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information TechnologiesRoutledge, London)
14.
DandekerC, 1990Surveillance, Power and ModernityPolity Press, Cambridge)
15.
DarnellJLodishHBaltimoreD, 1990Molecular Cell BiologyScientific American Books, New York)
16.
DeclichSCarterA O, 1994, “Public health surveillance: historical origins, methods and evaluation”Bulletin of the World Health Organisation72285–304
17.
DEFRA, 2002Defra's Horizon Scanning Strategy for ScienceDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR
18.
DEFRA, 2003Biosecurity Guidance for the Prevention of the Spread of Animal DiseasesDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR
19.
DeleuzeG, 1995, “Postscript on the societies of control”, in Gilles Deleuze: Negotiations 1972–1990 (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 169–183
20.
DonaldsonALowePWardN, 2002, “Virus—crisis—institutional change: the foot and mouth actor-network and the changing governance of rural affairs in the UK”Sociologia Ruralis42201–214
21.
EldenS, 2001Mapping the Present: Heidegger, Foucault and the Project of a Spatial HistoryContinuum, London)
22.
FishmanJ A, 1985, “The Whorfian hypothesis: varieties of valuation, confirmation and disinformation”, in The Rise and Fall of the Ethnic Revival Eds FishmanJ AGertnerM HLowryE GMilanW H (Mouton, New York) pp 473–487
23.
FoucaultM, 1973The Birth of the ClinicTavistock Publications, London)
24.
FoucaultM, 1975Discipline and PunishVintage, New York)
25.
FranaP, 2002, “Building the robot doctor: computer diagnosis and the reconfiguration of human disease”, paper given at Technotopias, University of Strathcylde, Glasgow, 10–12 July; available from FranaP, Charles Babbage Institute for the History of Information Technology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
26.
FyfeN RBannisterJ, 1996, “City watching: closed circuit television surveillance in public spaces”Area2837–46
27.
GandyO HJr, 1993The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal InformationWestview Press, Boulder, CO)
28.
GeertzC, 1973The Interpretation of CulturesBasic Books, New York)
29.
GilS, 1995, “The global panopticon: the neoliberal state, economic life and democratic surveillance”Alternatives201–49
GrahamS, 1998, “Spaces of surveillant simulation: new technologies, digital representations, and material geographies”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16483–504
32.
GrahamSWoodD, 2003, “Digitising surveillance: categorisation, space, inequality”Critical Social Policy23227–248
33.
HaggertyK DEricsonR V, 2000, “The surveillant assemblage”British Journal of Sociology51605–622
34.
HannahM, 1997, “Imperfect panopticism: imagining the construction of normal lives”, in Space and Social Theory: Interpreting Modernity and Postmodernity Eds BenkoGStrohmayerU (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 344–359
35.
Hansard, 2001, House of Commons Parliamentary Debates 6th Series, Volume 366, Column 705, Part 69 (The Staionery Office, London)
36.
HerbertS, 1996, “The geopolitics of the police: Foucault, disciplinary power and the tactics of the Los Angeles police department”Political Geography1547–59
37.
HinchliffeS, 2001, “Indeterminacy in-decisions—science policy and politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) crisis”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series26182–204
38.
KnealeJ, 1999, “‘A problem of supervision’: moral geographies of the nineteenth-century British public house”Journal of Historical Geography25333–348
39.
KoskelaH, 2000, “‘The gaze without eyes’: video-surveillance and the changing nature of urban space”Progress in Human Geography24243–265
40.
LatourB, 1986, “The powers of association”, in Power, Action, Belief Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 264–280
41.
LatourB, 1991, “Technology is society made durable”, in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination Ed. LawJ (Routledge, London) pp 103–131
42.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been ModernHarvester Wheatsheaf, Harlow, Essex)
43.
LatourB, 1999Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science StudiesHarvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
44.
LatourB, 2000, “When things strike back: a possible contribution of science studies to the social sciences”British Journal of Sociology51105–123
LawJ, 2000, “Economics as interference”, in Cultural Economy Eds du GayPPrykeM (Sage, London) pp 21–38
48.
LawJMolA, 1995, “Notes on materiality and sociality”Sociological Review43274–294
49.
LawJMolA (Eds), 2002Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge PracticesDuke University Press, Durham, NC)
50.
LeadbeaterC, 1999Living on Thin Air: The New EconomyViking, London)
51.
LianosM, 2001Le Nouveau Controle Social [The new social control] (L'Harmattan, Paris)
52.
LyonD, 1994The Electronic Eye: The Rise of the Surveillance SocietyPolity Press, Cambridge)
53.
LyonD, 2001Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday LifeOpen University Press, Buckingham)
54.
LyonD, 2002, “Editorial. Surveillance studies: understanding visibility, mobility and the phenetic fix”Surveillance and Society11–7
55.
McGrailB A, 1999, “Communication technology and local knowledges: the case of ‘peripheralized’ high-rise housing estates”Urban Geography20303–333
56.
MacLehoseLMcKeeMWeinbergJ, 2002, “Responding to the challenge of communicable disease in Europe”Science2952047–2050
57.
MarxG T, 1988UndercoverUniversity of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
58.
MarxG T, 1995, “The engineering of social control: the search of the silver bullet”, in Crime and Inequality Eds HaganJPetersonR (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) pp 225–246
59.
MarxG T, 2002, “What's new about the new surveillance? Classifying for change and continuity”Surveillance and Society18–29
60.
MooneyG, 1999, “Public health versus private practice: the contested development of compulsory disease notification in late nineteenth century Britain”Bulletin of the History of Medicine73238–267
61.
MurdochJ, 1997, “Inhuman/nonhuman/human: actor-network theory and the prospects for a nondualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15731–756
NorrisC, 2003, “From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control”, in Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination Ed. LyonD (Routledge, London) pp 249–281
64.
OcTTiesdellS, 2000, “Urban design approaches to safer city centres: the fortress, the panoptic, the regulatory and the animated”, in Landscapes of Defence Eds GoldJ RRevillG (Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex) pp 188–210
65.
OgbornM, 1992, “Local-power and state-regulation in 19th-century Britain”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series17215–226
66.
OgbornM, 1993, “Ordering the city: surveillance, public space and the reform of urban policing in England 1835–56”Political Geography12505–521
67.
PicklesJ (Ed.), 1995Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information SystemsGuilford Press, New York)
68.
PosterM, 1990The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social ContextPolity Press, Cambridge)
69.
RapportNOveringJ, 2000Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key ConceptsRoutledge, London)
70.
RuleJ B, 1973Private Lives, Public Surveillance: Social Control in the Information AgeAllen Lane, London)
71.
SackR D, 1986Human Territoriality: Its Theory and HistoryCambridge University Press, Cambridge)
72.
StarS LGriesemerJ, 1989, “Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39”Social Studies of Science19387–420
73.
The Royal Society, 2002Infectious Diseases in Livestock: Scientific Questions Relating to the Transmission, Prevention and Control of Epidemic Outbreaks of Infectious Disease in Livestock in Great BritainThe Royal Society, 6–9 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AG
74.
WardNDonaldsonALoweP, 2003The 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Crisis and the Management of Lesson Learning WP 67, Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne
WhorfB L, 1956Language, Thought and Reality: Selected WritingsChapman and Hall, London)
77.
WilliamsK SJohnstoneC, 2000, “The politics of the selective gaze: closed circuit television and the policing of public space”Crime Law and Social Change34183–210
