Abstract
In this paper I explore the geography in the ideas of one 19th-century psychological physician, Thomas Laycock, seeking to show how his understanding of ‘madness’ rested upon an ‘imaginative historical geography’ that explained the contents of a mad person's consciousness as reversions to the mental worlds of other peoples living in other periods and places. I reconstruct Laycock's ideas about memory, notably what he understood by ‘ancestral memory’ rooted in ancestral times and spaces, and I relate these ideas to his deeper conceptualisations of the time – space fabric of creation. I also examine Laycock's approach to the letters and drawings of one unnamed artist – patient, showing that it is possible from other sources to give this patient a name (William James Blacklock) and even a ‘voice’ of sorts; and I suggest that Laycock was guilty of failing to engage properly with this evidence, yet also of overinterpreting it at the same time. Acknowledging the dangers of ‘presentism’ in this paper, I critique how Laycock's ideas captured ‘otherness’ in a grid of ‘sameness’ largely indifferent to the very different, perhaps unknowable, imaginings present in madness (and in all who depart from established norms). My contribution should be taken as a circumspect effort to write a ‘critical and effective history’ inspired by Foucault's claims in the introduction to The Order of Things (1970, Tavistock Publications, London) about the relationship between ‘the Same and the Other’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
