Association of American Geographers, 2001AAG Handbook and Directory of Geographers (Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC)
2.
BarnesT, 2001, “Lives lived and lives told: Biographies of geography's quantitative revolution”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19409–429
3.
DemerittD, 2001, “Scientific forest conservation and the statistical picturing of nature's limits in the Progressive-era United States”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19431–459
4.
DoelM, 2001, “1a. Qualified quantitative geography”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19555–572
5.
DomoshM, 2000, “Unintentional transgressions and other reflections on the job search process”The Professional Geographer52703–708
6.
Environment and Planning A1998, “Theme issue: Reconsidering quantitative geography”30(2) 191–332
7.
Al-HindiFalconer K, 2000, “Structure, agency, and women geographers in academia at the end of the long twentieth century”The Professional Geographer52697–702
8.
Al-HindiFalconer KKawabataH, forthcoming, “Toward a more fully reflexive feminist geography”, in Doing Feminist Geography and Being Feminist in Geographic Research Ed. MossP (Blackwell, Oxford)
9.
HannahM, 2001, “Sampling and the politics of representation in US Census 2000”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19515–534
10.
HansonS, 1992, “Geography and feminism: Worlds in collision?”Annals of the Association of American Geographers82569–586
11.
HeppleL, 2001, “Multiple regression and spatial policy analysis: George Udny Yule and the origins of statistical social science”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19385–407
12.
McLaffertyS, 1995, “Counting for women”The Professional Geographer47436–441
13.
MattinglyDFalconer-Al-HindiK, 1995, “Should women count? A context for the debate”The Professional Geographer47427–435
14.
MonkJHansonS, 1982, “On not excluding half of the human in human geography”The Professional Geographer3411–23
15.
NastH J, 1998, “The body as ‘place’: Reflexivity and fieldwork in Kano, Nigeria”, in Places Through the Body Eds NastHPileS (Routledge, New York) pp 93–116
16.
ReayD, 1996, “Dealing with difficult differences: Reflexivity and social class in feminist research”Feminism and Psychology6443–456
17.
RocheleauD, 1995, “Maps, numbers, text and context: Mixing methods in feminist political ecology”The Professional Geographer47458–466
18.
RoseG, 1993, Feminism and Geography: Limits of Geographical Knowledge (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
19.
SamarasingheV, 1997, “Counting women's work: Intersection of time and space”, in Thresholds in Feminist Geography: Difference, Methodology, Representation Eds JonesJ PIIINastH JRobertsS M (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD) pp 129–144
20.
SheppardE, 2001, “Quantitative geography: Representations, practices, and possibilities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19535–554
21.
The Professional Geographer1995“Focus: Should women count? The role of quantitative methodology in feminist geographic research”47(4) 426–466
22.
GouldP, 1997, “Women and the culture of university physics in late nineteenth century Cambridge”The British Journal for the History of Science30127–149
23.
HeppleL W, 2001, “Multiple regression and spatial policy analysis: George Udny Yule and the origins of statistical social science”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19385–407
24.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientist and Engineers through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
25.
LivingstoneD N, 2000, “Making space for science”Erdkunde54285–296
26.
MacKenzieD, 1981Statistics in Britain 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
27.
MagnelloM E, 1999a, “The non-correlation of biometrics and eugenics: Rival forms of laboratory work in Karl Pearson's career at University College London, part 1”History of Science3779–106
28.
MagnelloM E, 1999b, “The non-correlation of biometrics and eugenics: Rival forms of laboratory work in Karl Pearson's career at University College London, part 2”History of Science37123–150
29.
SchafferS, 1998, “Physics laboratories and the Victorian country house”, in Making Space for Science: Territorial Themes in the Shaping of Knowledge Eds SmithCAgarJ (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 149–180
30.
MattinglyDFalconer-Al-HindiK, 1995, “Should women count? A context for the debate”The Professional Geographer47427–435
31.
BaudrillardJ, 1987Forget Foucault/Forget Baudrillard (Semiotext(e), New York)
32.
DerridaJ, 1991, “Choreographies” in A Derrida Reader: Between the Blinds Ed. KamufP (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 441–456