Recent work in disability studies has drawn attention to the changing relationship between the visual representations of disability and contemporary US capitalism. One change identified is a newfound cultural recognition of disabled sexuality. In this paper I extend these arguments by considering the kinds of sexuality projected onto the disabled body at the intersection of regimes of disability, sexuality, and neoliberalism. I provide a governmentality/queer reading of visual representations of disabled sexuality and of two self-help disabled sex manuals to argue that interest in disabled sex may witness an investment in the ongoing production of normative sexualities, what Foucault called a ‘truth of the self, within the context of neoliberal spatialities of disability. Based on dominant cultural understandings of sex as ‘natural’, ‘predictable’, and ‘representable’, these self-help manuals serve to produce a framework that depoliticizes the claims of disability culture movements. These manuals render the project of disabled sexual liberation a personal project of self-governance that scarcely challenges contemporary structures of (neo)liberalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarryAOsbourneTRoseN (Eds), 1996Foucault and Political Reason (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
2.
BinnieJ, 2004The Globalization of Sexuality (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
3.
BrennerNTheodoreN (Eds), 2002Spaces of Neoliberalism (Blackwell, Oxford).
4.
BrownM, 2004, “Between neoliberalism and cultural conservatism”Gender, Place and Culture1167–82.
5.
BrownW, 1995States of Injury (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
6.
BrownW, 2001Politics out of History (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
7.
ButlerJ, 2004Undoing Gender (Routledge, New York).
8.
ButlerR, 1999, “Double trouble or twice the fun?”, in Mind and Body Spaces Eds ButlerRParrH (Routledge, New York) pp 203–220.
FoucaultM, 1994, “Friendship as a way of life”, in Ethico: The Essential Works, Volume 1 Ed. RabinowP (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx) pp 135–140.
19.
FoucaultM, 2003Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975–1976 (Picador, New York).
20.
Garland-ThomsonR G, 2002a, “The politics of staring”, in Disability Studies Eds SnyderS LBrueggemannB JThomsonR G (Modern Language Association, New York) pp 56–75.
21.
Garland-ThomsonR, 2002b, “Theorizing disability”, in Relocating Postcolonialism Eds GoldbergD TQuaysonS (Routledge, New York) pp 231–269.
22.
HalberstamJ, 1995Skin Shows (Routledge, New York).
23.
HalberstamJ, 2005In a Queer Place and Time (New York University Press, New York).
HazledenR, 2003, “Love yourself”Journal of Sociology39413–429.
26.
HooperE L, 1994, “New insights”, in The Ragged Edge Ed. ShawB (The Avocado Press, Louisville, KY) pp 78–81.
27.
ImrieR (Ed.), 2001, “Barriered and bounded places and the spatialities of disability”Urban Studies38 (2).
28.
JessopB, 2002, “Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance”, in Spaces of Neoliberalism Eds BrennerNTheodoreN (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 105–125.
29.
KaufmanMSilverbergCOdetteF, 2003The Ultimate Guide to Sex and Disability (Cleis Press, San Francisco, CA).
30.
KerrAShakespeareT, 2002Genetic Politics (New Clarion Press, Cheltenham, Glos).
31.
KrollKKleinE L, 2001Enabling Romance (No Limits Publications, Horsham, PA).
32.
LaneH, 1997, “Constructions of deafness”, in The Disability Studies Reader Ed. DavisL J (Routledge, New York) pp 153–171.
33.
LarnerW, 2002, “Neoliberalism?”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21509–512.
34.
LintonS, 1998Claiming Disability (New York University Press, New York).
35.
McDowellL, 1995, “Body work”, in Mapping Desire Eds BellDValentineG (Routledge, New York).
36.
McRuerR, 2002, “Compulsory able-bodiedness and queer/disabled existence”, in Disability Studies Eds SnyderS LBrueggemannB JThomsonR G (Modern Language Association, New York) pp 88–99.
37.
McRuerRWilkersonA L (Eds), 2003, “Special issue: Desiring disability”, special issue ofGLQ9 (1–2).
38.
MitchellK, 2004Crossing the Neoliberal Line (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA).
39.
MuñozJ E, 1999Disidentifications (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
40.
NovasCRoseN, 2000, “Genetic risk and the rise of the somatic individual”Economy and Society29484–513.
41.
OrdoverN, 2003American Eugenics (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
42.
ParkD CRadfordJ PVickersM H, 1998, “Disability studies in human geography”Progress in Human Geography22208–233.
43.
PeckATickellJ, 2002, “Neoliberalizing space”, in Spaces of Neoliberalism Eds BrennerNTheodoreN (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 33–57.
44.
PhiloC, 2000, “Post-asylum geographies”Health and Place6135–136.
45.
RimkeH M, 2000, “Governing citizens through self-help literature”Cultural Studies1461–78.
46.
RoseN, 1998Inventing Ourselves (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
47.
RoseN, 1999Powers of Freedom (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
48.
SiebersT, 2002, “Tender organs, narcissism, and identity politics”, in Disability Studies Eds SnyderS LBrueggemannB JThomsonR G (Modern Language Association, New York) pp 40–55.
49.
StikerH-J, 1997A History of Disability (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).
50.
ValentineG, 1999, “What it means to be a man”, in Mind and Body Spaces Eds ButlerRParrH (Routledge, New York) pp 167–180.
51.
WarnerM, 2002Publics and Counterpublics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
52.
WaxmanB F, 1994, “It's time to politicize our sexual oppression”, in The Ragged Edge Ed. ShawB (The Avocado Press, Louisville, KY) pp 67–72.
53.
WhiteP, 2003, “Sex education: Or, how the blind became heterosexual”GLQ9 (1–2) 133–148.
