In the context of Singapore and Vancouver strategically repositioning themselves as gateway cities between Asian and North American markets, I focus on Singapore's multiracialism and Vancouver's multiculturalism to frame how people encounter ‘the international’ along racialized and cultural lines in their daily lives. Building on an emerging appetite for everyday life theory in international relations, I look at Henri Lefebvre's work on alienation to explore how cultural pluralism policies structure everyday life through what I call ‘everyday borders of the international’. This will reveal how the interrelationships between daily life, political platforms like these policies, and broader political and economic structures shape different everyday encounters of the international.
AgnewJ, 1994, “The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory”Review of International Political Economy153–80
2.
AmenM, 1999“Borrowing authority: Eclipsing government”, in Approaches to Global Governance Theory Eds HewsonMSinclairT (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 173–194
3.
BauerHBrighiE, 2009Pragmatism in International Relations (Routledge, New York)
Bokhorst-HengW, 1999, “Singapore's Speak Mandarin Campaign: Language ideological debates and the imagination of a nation”, in Language Ideological Debates Ed. BlommaertJ (De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin) pages 235–262
6.
BourdieuPPasseronJ-C, 1990Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture2nd edition (Sage, London)
7.
BrennerNEldenS, 2009, “Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory”International Political Sociology3353–377
8.
BrownC, 2001Understanding International Relations2nd edition (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
9.
CollierS JOngA, 2005, “Global assemblages, anthropological problems”, in Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems Eds CollierJ SOngA (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 3–21
10.
DaviesM, 2006, “Everyday life in the global political economy”, in International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics Ed. de GoedeM (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 219–237
11.
DaviesM, 2010, “‘You can't charge innocent people for saving their lives!’ Work in Buffy the Vampire Slayer”International Political Sociology4178–195
12.
de CerteauM, 1984The Practice of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
13.
EdkinsJPin-FatV, 2005, “Through the wire: Relations of power and relations of violence”Millennium341–24
14.
EnloeC, 2000Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
15.
FortierA M, 2008Multicultural Horizons: Diversity and the Limits of the Civil Nation (Routledge, New York)
16.
FoucaultM, 1980, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972 – 1977 (Gordon Colin, New York)
17.
FranklinM I, 2004Postcolonial Politics, the Internet, and Everyday Life: Pacific Traversals Online (Routledge, New York)
18.
FraserB, 2008, “Towards a philosophy of the urban: Henri Lefebvre's uncomfortable application of Bergsonism”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26338–358
19.
GoedeM (Ed), 2006International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
20.
GoffmanE, 1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday Anchor Books, Garden City, NY)
21.
GoonewardenaKKipferSMilgromRSchmidC, 2008, “On the production of Henri Lefebvre”, in Space, Difference, Everyday Life, Reading Henri Lefebvre Eds GoonewardenaKKipferSMilgromRSchmidC (Routledge, New York) pp 1–23
HarootunianH, 2000History's Disquiet: Modernity, Cultural Practice, and the Question of Everyday Life (Columbia University Press, New York)
24.
HellerA, 1984Everyday Life (Routledge, London)
25.
HellerA, 1990A Philosophy of Morals (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
26.
HiebertDLeyD, 2003, “Assimilation, cultural pluralism, and social exclusion among ethnocultural groups in Vancouver”Urban Geography2416–44
27.
HobsonJ MSeabrookeL, 2007, “Everyday IPE: Revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy”, in Everyday Politics of the World Economy Eds HobsonJ MSeabrookeL (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 1–23
28.
HuatC B, 2007, “Multiracialism as official policy: A critique of the management of difference in Singapore”, in Social Resilience in Singapore: Reflections from the London Bombings Ed. VasuN (Select Publishings, Singapore) pp 51–67
29.
IrigarayL, 1985Speculum of the Other Woman (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
30.
KratochwilF, 1989Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
31.
LangleyP, 2008The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
LawsonG, 2008, “For a public international relations”International Political Sociology217–37
33.
LeanderA, 2001, “Pierre Bourdieu on economics”Review of International Political Economy8344–353
34.
LefebvreH, 1968Critique de la vie quotidienne: Volume 12nd edition (L'Arche Éditeur, Paris)
35.
LefebvreH, 2003Key Writings (Continuum, New York)
36.
LefebvreH, 2004Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and the Everyday Life (Continuum, London)
37.
LeyD, 2008, “The immigrant church as an urban service hub”Urban Studies452057–2074
38.
MarxK, 1964, Early Writings Ed. BottomoreT R (McGraw-Hill, New York)
39.
MauzyD KMilneS, 2002Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party (Routledge, London)
40.
MitchellK, 1993, “Multiculturalism, or the united colors of capitalism?”Antipode25263–294
41.
MitchellK, 2001, “Educating the national citizen in neoliberal times: From the multicultural self to the strategic cosmopolitan”Transactions of the British Institute of Geographers, New Series28387–403
42.
MitchellK, 2004Crossing the Neoliberal Line: Pacific Rim Migration and the Metropolis (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
43.
MontsionJ M, 2009, “Re-locating politics at the gateway: Everyday life in Singapore's global schoolhouse”Pacific Affairs82637–656
44.
NagataJ, 2005, “Christianity among transnational Chinese: Religious versus (sub)ethnic affiliation”International Migration4399–130
45.
NeumannI B, 2002, “Returning practice to the linguistic turn: The case of diplomacy”Millennium31627–651
46.
NgT, 2005, “Migrant women as wives and workers in Singapore”, in Asian Migrations: Sojourning, Displacement, Homecoming and Other Eds LorenteB PPiperNHsiu-HuaS (National University of Singapore Press, Singapore) pp 99–110
47.
NyiriP, 2003, “Moving targets: Chinese Christian proselytising among transnational migrants from the People's Republic of China”European Journal of East Asian Studies2263–301
48.
OldsK, 1998, “Globalization and urban change: Tales from Vancouver via Hong Kong”Urban Geography19360–385
49.
OldsK, 2007, “Global assemblage: Singapore, foreign universities, and the construction of a global education hub”World Development35959–975
50.
PalanR, 2000, “A world of their making: An evaluation of the constructivist critique in international relations”Review of International Studies26575–598
51.
PouliotV, 2008, “The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities”International Organization62257–288
52.
QadeerM A, 1997, “Pluralistic planning for multicultural cities: The Canadian practice”Journal of the American Planning Association63481–494
53.
RahimL Z, 1998The Singapore Dilemma: The Political and Educational Marginality of the Malay Community (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
54.
RenggerN J, 2001, “Negative Dialectic? The two modes of critical theory in world politics”, in Critical Theory and World Politics Ed. JonesR W (Lynne Reinner, Boulder, CO) pp 91–110
55.
SchwartzHSeabrookeL, 2008, “Varieties of residential capitalism in the international political economy: Old welfare states and the new politics of housing”Comparative European Politics6237–261
56.
ShapiroI, 2004, “Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics: Or: What's wrong with political science and what to do about it”, in Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics Eds ShapiroISmithRMasoukT (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 19–41
57.
SinclairT, 2000, “Deficit discourse: The social construction of fiscal rectitude”, in Globalization and its Critics: Perspectives from Political Economy Ed. GermainR (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 185–203
58.
SmithS, 2004, “Singing our world into existence: International relations theory and September 2011”International Studies Quarterly48499–515
59.
StrangeS, 1997, “Territory, state, authority and economy: A new realist ontology of global political Economy”, in The New Realism Ed. CoxR W (Macmillan, New York) pp 3–19
TeoP, 2005, “Mandarinising Singapore: A critical analysis of slogans in Singapore's Speak Mandarin Campaign”Critical Discourse Studies2121–142
62.
TicknerA D, 2005, “Everyday experience as IR theory”, paper presented at the Annual International Studies Association Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2–5 March http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p70766_index.html
63.
Van der PiljK, 2002, “Historical materialism and the emancipation of labour”, in Historical Materialism and Globalization Eds RupertMSmithH (Routledge, London) pp 129–146
64.
VrastiW, 2008, “The strange case of ethnography and international relations”Millennium37279–301
65.
WatersJ L, 2002, “Flexible families? Astronaut households and the experiences of lone mothers in Vancouver, British Columbia”Social and Cultural Geography3117–134
66.
WendtA, 1992, “Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics”International Organization46391–425
67.
WightC, 2006Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
68.
WongT H, 2003, “Education and state formation reconsidered: Chinese school identity in postwar Singapore”Journal of Historical Sociology16237–265
69.
YuL, 2010, “Christianity as a Chinese belief”, in Asian Religions in British Columbia Eds DeVriesLBakerDOvermyerD (UBC Press, Vancouver) pp 233–248
