My aim is to question the concept of an indisputable hierarchy of scales—global, national, regional, and local—in which processes, outcomes, and responses can be categorised as originating at distinct and discrete levels. Such a concept has allowed regional and local influence to be presented as the context in which the operation of global processes is fine-tuned, rather than as being a formative part of those processes. I aim to apply nonhierarchical modes of thinking about scale to an empirical example by examining a federally funded urban development programme in Adelaide: the Western Area Strategy, a federal initiative, administered in a local setting by a state administration. The relations between processes, institutions, sociocultural, economic, and political conditions at a variety of scales are shown to operate simultaneously and multidirectionally in defining the local outcomes of the programme. These relations are constitutive of scale itself. The ‘local’ outcomes of policy are shown to be formulated at a variety of scales and to be mutually constitutive of outcomes at other, ‘higher’, scales. Accepting the notion that scales are mutually constitutive and questioning the production of scale and interscale relations opens new paths of explanation for the spectrum of economic, sociocultural, and political processes determining the nature of contemporary society and determining their concrete expression in political and social interactions within nation-states and localities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACIR, 1981“Local government systems of Australia”, Advisory Council for Inter-government Relations, 110 Hampden Road, Battery Point, Tasmania 7000
AlbrechtsL, 1991, “Changing roles and positions of planners”Urban Studies2123–137
4.
AlexanderI, 1994, “DURD revisited? Federal policy initiatives for urban and regional planning 1991–1994”Urban Policy and Research126–26
5.
AlfordRFriedlandR, 1985Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State and Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
6.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1994South Australian Economic Indicators (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
7.
BadcockB, 1991, “Where have financial deregulation and structural reform got the housing sector in Australia?”Australian Geographer22129–131
8.
BadcockB, 1993, “The urban programme as an instrument of crisis management in Australia”Urban Policy and Research1172–80
9.
BCA, 1993Australia 2010: Creating the Future AustraliaBusiness Council of Australia, 15/10 Queens Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004
10.
BeauregardR, 1991, “Capital restructuring and the new built environment of global cities”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1590–105
11.
BellSHeadB, 1994, “Australia's political economy: Critical themes and issues”, in State Economy and Public Policy in Australia Eds BellSHeadB (Oxford University Press, Melbourne) pp 1–23
12.
BirrellR, 1991, “Infrastructure costs on the urban fringe background”, Urban and Regional Issues paper 10, Economic Planning Advisory Council (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
13.
BrotchieJGippsPNewtonP, 1995, “Urban land use, transport and the information economy: Metropolitan employment, journey to work trends and their implications for transport”Urban Futures1737–49
14.
BunkerR, 1994, “Strategic planning; fashionable or fundamental”Urban Futures488–92
15.
BurganB, 1993, “Recent trends in the South Australian economy”, in Making the Future Work: Crisis and Challenge in the South Australian Economy Eds GreenRGenoffR (Allen and Unwin, Sydney) pp 21–34
16.
ChapmanP, 1993, “Policies for competitive advantage”, in Making the Future Work: Crisis and Challenge in the South Australian Economy Eds GreenRGenoffR (Allen and Unwin, Sydney) pp 215–223
17.
ClareR, 1993, “Regional and urban policy: The new growth industry”Directions in Government714–19
18.
Commonwealth Department of Housing and Regional Development, 1994Corporate Plan 1994/95 (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
19.
CookeP, 1986, “The changing urban and regional system in the United Kingdom”Regional Studies20243–251
20.
CookeP, (Ed.), 1989Locality Studies: The Changing Face of Urban Britain (Unwin Hyman, London)
21.
CoxK, 1993, “The local and the global in the new urban politics”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11433–448
22.
CoxKMairA, 1988, “Locality and community in the politics of local economic development”Annals of the Association of American Geographers78307–325
23.
CoxKMairA, 1989, “Levels of abstraction in locality studies”Antipode21121–132
24.
Department of Planning and Building, 1993City of Adelaide Economic ProfileDepartment of Planning and Building, Flinders St, Adelaide, SA 5000
25.
DHUD, 1994a, “Premier announces ecovision for Glenelg” Media Release, 2 October, South Australia Department of Housing and Urban Development, Level 4, Grenfell Street, GPO Box 667, Adelaide, SA 5001
26.
DHUD, 1994b, “Glenelg/West Beach development” Discussion Paper, South Australian Department of Housing and Urban Development, Level 4, Grenfell Street, GPO Box 667, Adelaide, SA 5001
27.
DHUD, 1995Evaluation Instrument 1994–95, Building Better Cities, South AustraliaSouth Australian Department of Housing and Urban Development, Level 4, Grenfell Street, GPO Box 667, Adelaide, SA 5001
28.
DuncanSSavageM, 1989, “Space, scale and locality”Antipode21179–206
29.
DuncanSSavageM, 1990, “Space, scale and locality: A reply to Cooke and Warde”Antipode2267–72
30.
DuncanSSavageM, 1991, “Commentary: New perspectives on the locality debates”Environment and Planning A23155–164
31.
DunfordMKafkalasG, 1992, “The global—local interplay, corporate geographies and spatial development strategies in Europe”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe: The Global—Local Interplay and Spatial Development Strategies Eds DunfordMKafkalasG (Belhaven Press, London) pp 1–39
32.
EisengerP, 1988The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Economic Development Policy in the United States (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
33.
EPAC, 1993aMedium Term Review: Opportunities for GrowthEconomic Planning Advisory Council (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
34.
EPAC, 1993b, “Structural change and economic growth”, Background Paper 28, Economic Planning Advisory Council (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
35.
EPAC, 1994, “Economic effects of microeconomic reform”, Background Paper 38, Economic Planning Advisory Council (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
36.
FaganR, 1995a, “Economy, culture and environment: Perspectives on the Australian food industry”Australian Geographer261–10
37.
FaganR, 1995b, “The region as political discourse”, address given to plenary session, Institute of Australian Geographers, Annual Conference, Newcastle Town Hall, 24 September; copy available from the author, School of Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2113
38.
FaganRLe HeronR, 1994, “Reinterpreting the geography of accumulation: The global shift and local restructuring”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13265–287
39.
GalliganBLimBLovegroveK, (Eds), 1993Managing Microeconomic ReformFederalism Research Centre, Australian National University, Canberra
40.
GerritsenR, 1994, “Microeconomic reform”, in State Economy and Public Policy in Australia Eds BellSHeadB (Oxford University Press, Melbourne) pp 267–291
41.
GoodwinMPainterJ, 1996, “Local governance after Fordism”, presented to the Annual Conference of the Institute of British Geographers, University of Strathclyde; copy available from Dr Painter, Department of Geography, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE
42.
GoodwinMDuncanSHalfordS, 1993, “Regulation theory, the local state and the transition of urban politics”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1167–89
43.
HarrisonBBluestoneB, 1988The Great U-turn: Corporate Restructuring and the Polarizing of America (Basic Books, New York)
44.
HarrisonCBurgessJ, 1994, “Social constructions of nature: A case study of conflicts over the development of Rainham Marshes”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series19291–310
45.
HarveyD, 1989, “From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism”Geographica Annaler B713–17
46.
HawkeR, 1990, “Towards a closer partnership”, speech to the National Press Club, Canberra, 19 July; copy available from National Press Club, Building 16, National Ctt, Barton, Canberra, ACT 2600
47.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Long Term Strategies, 1992Patterns of Urban Settlement: Consolidating the Future (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
48.
HoweB, 1993, untitled paper, presented to South Australian Winter Planning Seminar 28 July; copy available from Royal Australian Planning Institute, 1 King William Road, Unley, Adelaide, SA 5061
49.
HoweB, 1995, “The role of the Federal Government in improving the built environment in Australia”Urban Futures173–8
50.
HowittR, 1993, “A world in a grain of sand: Towards a reconceptualisation of geographical scale”Australian Geographer4233–45
51.
JessopB, 1993, “Towards a Schumpterian workfare state: Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political economy”Studies in Political Economy407–39
52.
JessopB, 1994, “Post-Fordism and the state”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 251–280
53.
JonasA, 1994, “The scale politics of spatiality”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12257–265
54.
JonesM, 1993Transforming Australian Local Government: Making it Work (Allen and Unwin, Sydney)
55.
LennonM, 1992, “The Adelaide plan”, in The Impact of Federalism on Metropolitan Strategies in Australia Eds FletcherCWalshC (Federalism Research Centre, Canberra) pp 111–117
56.
LepaniB, 1994, “The economic role of cities: Australia in the global economy”Urban Future413–23
57.
Little, Arthur and Association, 1992New Directions for South Australia's EconomyArthur D Little, International Inc., Level 38/44, Young Street, Sydney, NSW 2000
58.
LukeT, 1994, “Placing power/siting space: The politics of global and local in the new world order”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12613–628
59.
McGuirkP M, 1994, “Economic restructuring and the realignment of the urban planning system: The case of Dublin”Urban Studies33289–307
60.
McGuirkP MWinchesterH P MDunnK M, 1996, “Entrepreneurial approaches to urban decline: The Honeysuckle redevelopment in inner Newcastle, NSW”Environment and Planning A281815–1841
61.
MartinRSunleyPWillsJ, 1994, “The decentralization of industrial relations? New institutional spaces and the role of local context in British engineering”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series19457–482
62.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (Macmillan, London)
63.
MasseyD, 1991, “The political place of locality studies”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23267–281
64.
MayerM, 1992, “The shifting local political system in European cities”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe: The Global—Local Interplay and Spatial Development Strategies Eds DunfordMKafkalasG (Belhaven Press, London) pp 255–274
65.
MinneryJ, 1993, “Urban policy: Issues of coordination”, in Policy Making in Volatile Times Eds HedeAPrasserS (Hale and Iremonger, Sydney) pp 226–239
66.
MurdochJMarsdenT, 1995, “The spatialization of politics: Local and national actor-spaces in environmental conflict”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series20368–380
67.
NeilsonL, 1992, “Discussion”, in The Impact of Federalism on Metropolitan Strategies in Australia Eds FletcherCWalshC (Federal Research Centre, Canberra) pp 211–214
68.
NeilsonLSpillerM, 1992, “Managing the cities for national economic development: The role of the building Better Cities Programme”, presented to the Biennial Congress of the Royal Australian Planning Institute, Canberra, 26–30 April; copy available from L Neilson, National Capital Planning Authority, 10 Brisbane Avenue, Barton, Canberra, ACT 2600
69.
O'ConnorKStimsonR, 1994, “Economic change and the fortunes of Australian cities”Urban Futures41–12
70.
OECD, 1992Structural Change and Industrial Performance (OECD, Paris)
71.
O'LoughlinB, 1991, “Urban consolidation and urban sprawl: A question of density”Urban Policy and Research9148–156
72.
O'NeillPFaganR, 1995, “The new regional policy: What chance of success?”Australian Quarterly Winter, 55–67
73.
PeckJTickellA, 1994, “Searching for a new institutional fix: The after-Fordist crisis and the global—local disorder”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 280–315
74.
PickvanceCPreteceilleE, 1991State Restructuring and Local Power: A Comparative Perspective (Frances Pinter, London)
75.
Planning Review, 19922020 Vision: Planning Strategy for Metropolitan Adelaide Planning ReviewSouth Australian Department of Environment and Planning, 55 Grenfell Street, Adelaide, SA 5000
76.
PuseyM, 1991Economic Rationalism in Canberra: A Nation Building State Changes its Mind (Cambridge University Press, Melbourne)
77.
RavenhillJ, 1994, “Australia and the global economy”, in State Economy and Public Policy in Australia Eds BellSHeadB (Oxford University Press, Melbourne) pp 75–117
78.
RichD, 1993, “‘Tom's vision’? State policy and industrialisation in South Australia from the late 1930s”, presented to the Institute of Australian Geographers Conference, Monash University, September; copy available from the author, School of Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2113
79.
SAULT, 1993Mile End Railyards Preliminary Feasibility StudySouth Australian Urban Land Trust, Level 8, Riverside Centre, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000
80.
SelfP, 1988, “The resurgence of metropolitan planning in Australia”The Planner December, 16–19
81.
SmithN, 1987, “Dangers of the empirical turn: Some comments on the CURS initiative”Antipode1959–69
82.
SmithM, 1988, “The region is dead! Long live the region!”Political Geography Quarterly7141–152
83.
SmithN, 1989, “Uneven development and location theory: Towards a synthesis”, in New Models in Geography: The Political Economy Perspective, Volume 1 Eds PeetRThriftN (Unwin Hyman, London) pp 142–163
84.
SmithN, 1990Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
85.
SmithN, 1992, “Geography, difference and the politics of scale”, in Postmodernism and the Social Sciences Eds DohertyJGrahamEMalekM (Macmillan, London) pp 57–79
86.
SmithNDennisW, 1987, “The restructuring of geographical scale: Coalescence and fragmentation of the northern core region”Economic Geography63160–182
87.
South Australian Planning Strategy, 1994Metropolitan Adelaide, Volume 1Department of Premier and Cabinet, State Administration Centre, Victoria Square, Adelaide, SA 5000
88.
SPC, 1990, “Towards a closer partnership”, Communiqué, Special Premiers' Conference, 30–31 October, Brisbane; copy available from Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, 3–5 National Ctt, Barton, Canberra, ACT 2600
89.
StilwellF, 1993, “State and capital in urban and regional development”, in State Economy in Australia Ed. HeadB (Oxford University Press, Melbourne) pp 199–218
90.
SwyngedouwE A, 1992, “The mammon quest: ‘glocalisation’, interspatial competition and monetary order: The construction of new spatial scales”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe: The Global—Local Interplay and Spatial Development Strategies Eds DunfordMKafkalasG (Belhaven Press, London) pp 39–67
91.
Taskforce on Regional Development, 1993Developing Australia: A Regional Perspectivetwo volumes (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
92.
Urban Design Taskforce, 1994Urban Design in Australia (Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra)
93.
UrryJ, 1986, “Locality research: The case of Lancaster”Regional Studies20233–242
94.
WalshC, 1993, “Avoiding the pitfalls”, in Making the Future Work: Crisis and Challenge in the South Australian Economy Eds GreenRGenoffR (Allen and Unwin, Sydney) pp 200–214
95.
WannaJ, 1994, “Can the state ‘manage’ the macroeconomy?”, in State Economy and Public Policy in Australia Eds BellSHeadB (Oxford University Press, Melbourne) pp 225–249
96.
WilmothD, 1990, “Urban infrastructure finance issues in Australia: A review in the context of international experience”Urban Policy and Research8159–168
97.
WiltshireK, 1986Planning and Federalism: Australian and Canadian Experience (University of Queensland Press, London)
98.
WinterIBrookeT, 1993, “Urban planning and the entrepreneurial state: The view from Victoria, Australia”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy11262–278
