This paper is concerned with discourses of threat and security deployed by the United States and India after September 11. In the context of the United States these discourses have been used to justify war in Afghanistan and in Iraq and have revolved around the subject of the Muslim male as perpetually dangerous. Eager to support the United States in its war against terror, India echoed the construction of the Muslim male as dangerous, which served to fulfill India's own internal and regional supremacy agendas. Bolstered, therefore, by the emerging discourse of Muslim terrorists, in 2002 the Hindu Right was complicit in orchestrating genocide against Muslims in Gujarat where 2000 Muslims were killed and 150000 Muslims were rendered homeless. Examining these and other incidents, I examine the similarity in discourses of threat and security deployed by the United States and India. I argue that the similarity in discourses emerges because of a particular understanding of time and space. I make two interconnected arguments: first, time and the very understanding and construction of history are distorted, collapsed, and twisted such that revenge for past atrocities and the threat of future ones are used to justify preemptive military action. Second, there is a particular geography to this doctrine of threat and security that is being established by demarcating us against them. This new spatial arrangement is being formed contingent on a particular understanding of time and history as a linear singular narrative and on the creation of political alliances between India, the United States, and Israel.
BidwaiPVanaikA, 2001South Asia on a Short Fuse: Nuclear Politics and the Future of Global Disarmament (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
10.
BowdenB, 2002, “Reinventing imperialism in the wake of September 11”Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations128–46.
11.
BremanJ, 2001, “An informalised labor system: End of market dualism”Economic and Political Weekly364804–4821.
12.
Campaign to Stop Funding Hate, 2002, “The foreign exchange of hate: IDRF and the American funding of Hindutva”, http://www.stopfundinghate.org.
13.
ChakravartiUHaksarN, 1987Three Days in the Life of a Nation (Lancer International, New Delhi).
14.
ChenoyK MShuklaS PSubramanianK SVanaikA, 2002Gujarat Carnage 2002: A Report to the Nation (Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi), http://www.awaazsaw.org/awaaz_res.htm.
JaffrelotC, 1993The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics 1925 to the 1990s (Penguin Books, New Delhi).
29.
JaffrelotC, 2003India's Silent Revolution: The Rise of the Lower Castes in North India (Columbia University Press, New York).
30.
JaffrelotC, 2004, “Introduction: The rise to power of the BJP”, in The BJPand the Compulsions of Politics in India Eds HansenT BJaffrelotC (Oxford University Press, New Delhi) pp 1–21.
KapurR, 2002, “The tragedy of victimization rhetoric: Resurrecting the ‘native’ subject in international/post-colonial feminist legal politics”Harvard Human Rights Journal151–28.
KumaraswamyP R, 2002, “India–Israel relations: Humble beginnings, a bright future”, American Jewish Committee, PO Box 705, New York, NY 10150.
36.
ManiL, 1998Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
37.
MathewBPrashadV, 2000, “The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva”Ethnic and Racial Studies23516–534.
38.
MohantyC T, 2002, “‘Under Western eyes’ revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28499–535.
39.
National Intelligence Council, 2004Mapping the Global Future (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
40.
OngA, 1988, “Colonialism and modernity: Feminist representations of women in non-western societies”Inscriptions3/479–93.
41.
OzaR, 2006, “The geography of Hindu right wing violence in India”, in Violent Georaphies: Fear, Terror, and Political Violence Eds GregoryDPredR (Routledge, New York).
SarkarTButaliaU, 1995Women and the Hindu Right (Kali for Women, New Delhi).
53.
SavarkarV D, 1989Hindutva6th edition (Bharti Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi); first published in 1923.
54.
SimpsonE, 2004, “‘Hindutva’ as rural planning paradigm in post-earthquake Gujarat”, in The Politics of Cultural Mobilization in India Eds ZavosJWyattAHewittV (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 136–165.
SpivakG C, 1988, “Can the subaltern speak?”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) pp 271–313.
57.
The White House, 2002The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (The White House, Washington, DC).
58.
van der VeerP, 1994Religious Nationalism: Hindus and Muslims in India (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
