The tensions between the analytical framework provided by regulation theory and the specificities of the Japanese development trajectory are explored in this paper. Superficially at least, the Japanese case would seem to be (regulation-)theoretically intractable, given the country's unique postwar development path and given the apparent inconsistency of its growth pattern with classic notions of (Atlantic) Fordism, As such, the Japanese experience raises questions about conventional treatments of the historical geography of capitalist restructuring within (different readings of) regulation theory. Regulation theory, it is argued, represents an evolving political-economic method, not a rigid transition model. By implication, the idiosyncrasies of the Japanese experience present an opportunity to interrogate and develop regulationist categories. Critically reviewing the recent regulationist literature from and on Japan, the authors argue that the tension between the theory and this ambiguous case can be rendered a creative one.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgliettaM, 1979A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience (New Left Books, London)
2.
AgliettaM, 1982, “World capitalism in the eighties”New Left Reviewnumber 136, 5–41
3.
AltvaterE, 1992, “Fordist and post-Fordist international division of labor and monetary regimes”, in Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development Eds StorperMScottA J (Routledge, London) pp 21–45
4.
AokiK, 1992, “Nihon-teki keiei ni okeru zyunan na sagyo soshiki to kanri tosei-ken” [Flexible work organisation and managerial control in the Japanese firm]Hiroshima Women's University Bungakubu Kiyou277–19
5.
AokiM, 1988Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
6.
AsanumaB, 1989, “Nihon ni okeru maker to supplier tono kankei” [Relations between manufacturers and suppliers in Japan], in Nikon no chusho kigyo [Small and medium-sized firms in Japan] Eds TsuchiyaMMiwaY (Tokyo University Press, Tokyo) pp 61–78
7.
BarbrookR, 1990, “Mistranslations: Lipietz in London and Paris”Science as Culture880–117
8.
BerqueA (Ed.), 1987Le Japon et son double: Logiques d'un autoportrait (Masson, Paris)
9.
BestM H, 1990The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring (Polity Press, Cambridge)
10.
BowonderBMiyakeT, 1992, “A model of corporate innovation management: Some recent high tech innovations in Japan”R&D Management22319–335
11.
BoyerR, 1988, “Formalizing with growth regimes”, in Technical Change and Economic Theory Eds DosiGFreemanCNelsonRSilverbergGSoeteL (Frances Pinter, London) pp 608–630
12.
BoyerR, 1990aNyuumon Régulation [An introduction to regulation theory] (Fujiwara-shoten, Tokyo)
13.
BoyerR, 1990bThe Regulation School: A Critical Introduction (Columbia University Press, New York)
14.
BoyerR, 1991, “Rapport salarial et régime d'accumulation au Japon: Emergence, originalitiés et prospective”, paper presented to Colloque Franco-Japonais d'Economie, Grenoble, October; copy available from CEPREMAP, 142 rue de Chevaleret, 75013 Paris
15.
CoriatB, 1992Gyakuten no shikou: Nihon kigyo no rodo to soshiki [Turning thinking on its head: Work and organisation in Japanese firms] (Fujiwara-shoten, Tokyo)
16.
CurryJ, 1993, “The flexibility fetish: A review essay on flexible specialisation”Capital and Classnumber 50, 99–126
17.
DavisM, 1978, “‘Fordism’ in crisis: A review of Michel Aglietta's Régulation et crisis: L'expérience des Etats-Unis”New Left Reviewnumber 112, 207–269
18.
de VroeyM, 1984, “A regulation approach interpretation of the contemporary crisis”Capital and Classnumber 23, 454–456
19.
DohseKJurgensUMalschT, 1985, “From ‘Fordism’ to Toyotism'? The social organization of the labor process in the Japanese automobile industry”Politics and Society14115–146
20.
DoreR, 1973British Factory-Japanese Factory: The Origins of National Diversity in Industrial Relations (George Allen and Unwin, London)
21.
DoreR, 1987Flexible Rigidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy, 1970–1980 (Athlone Press, London)
22.
EbizukaA, 1990, “Nihon-gata shihon shugi to regulation” [Japanese capitalism and social regulation]Jyokyo1–254–69
23.
FriedmanD, 1988The Misunderstood Miracle: Industrial Development and Political Change in Japan (Cornell University Press, New York)
24.
FujiokaW, 1986, “The rise of micromasses”Japan Echo1331–38
25.
GlynAHughesALipietzASinghA, 1991, “The rise and fall of the golden age”, in The Golden Age of Capitalism Eds MarglinSSchorJ B (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 39–125
26.
GotoM, 1990, “Rizyun-kyoso genri heno rodosha no doui to kuppuku” [Workers' co-operation and the subordination to the principles of profitability and competition]Mado5180–183
27.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Post-modernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
28.
HirataK, 1990, “Hoho-teki shikin-seki to shiteno nihon” [Japan as a methodological touchstone]Mado5189–198
29.
ImaiK, 1989, “Kigyo group” [Corporate groups], in Nihon no kigyo [Japanese firms] Eds ImaiKKomiyaR (Tokyo University Press, Tokyo) pp 131–161
30.
InoueY, 1991, “Kin'yu no regulation no henbo” [Changes in the social regulation of finance], in Post-fordism Eds YamadaTSudoO (Ohmura-shoten, Tokyo) pp 37–55
31.
ItohM, 1992a, “The Japanese model of post-Fordism”, in Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development Eds StorperMScottA J (Routledge, London) pp 116–134
32.
ItohM, 1992b, “Post-Fordism to nihon shihon shugi” [Post-Fordism and Japanese capitalism], in Nihon-gata kigyo shakai no kozo [The structure of Japan's corporate-oriented society] Kiso keizai kagaku kenkyusho [Institute of Basic Economic Research] (Rodo-junpo-sha, Tokyo) pp 96–140
33.
JaikumarR, 1986, “Postindustrial manufacturing”Harvard Business Review6469–76
34.
JessopB, 1990, “Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect”Economy and Society19153–216
35.
JessopB, 1992a, “Fordism and post-Fordism: A critical reformulation”, in Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development Eds StorperMScottA J (Routledge, London) pp 46–69
36.
JessopB, 1992b, “Changing forms and functions of the state in an era of globalization and regionalization”, paper presented to EAPE conference, Paris, November; copy available from the author, Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster, Lancaster
37.
JessopB, 1992c, “Regulation and politics: The integral economy and the integral state”, mimeo, Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YB
38.
JessopB, 1992d, “Regulation, staat und hegemonie”, in Hegemonie und Staat: Kapitalistische Regulation als Projekt und Prozess Eds DemirovicAKrebsH-PSablowskiT (Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster) pp 232–262
39.
JohnsonC, 1982MITI and the Japanese Miracle (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA)
40.
KatoT, 1989, “The age of ‘Japamerica’—taking Japanese development seriously”Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies2161–78
41.
KatoTStevenR, 1991, “Is Japanese capitalism post-Fordist?”, papers of the Japanese Studies Centre 16, Japanese Studies Centre, Monash University, Melbourne
42.
KenneyMFloridaR, 1988, “Beyond mass production: Production and the labor process in Japan”Politics and Society16121–158
43.
KenneyMFloridaR, 1989, “Japan's role in a post-Fordist age”Futures21136–151
44.
KomiyaR (Ed.), 1984Nihon no sangyo seisaku [Industrial policy in Japan] (Tokyo University Press, Tokyo)
45.
KoshiroK, 1990, “Japan”, in The Re-emergence of Small Enterprises: Industrial Restructuring in Industrialised Countries Eds SengenbergerWLovemanG WPioreM J (International Labour Organisation, Geneva) pp 173–222
46.
KumazawaM, 1989Nihon-teki keiei no mei-am [Positive and negative aspects of Japanese management] (Chikuma-shobo, Tokyo)
47.
KyotaniE, 1992, “Nihon-teki rodo katei no flexible system town nanika” (What is flexible about the Japanese labour process?]Mado11104–116
48.
LeadbeaterC, 1993, “No longer a superficial wound”Financial Times 1 March, page 15
49.
LeborgneDLipietzA, 1992, “Conceptual fallacies and open questions on post-Fordism”, in Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development Eds StorperMScottA J (Routledge, London) pp 332–348
50.
LehndorffS, 1993, “Working time and the organisation of work”, paper presented to the conference of the International Working Party on Labour Market Segmentation, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, July; copy available from the author, Institut Arbeit und Technik, Florastrasse 26, 4650 Gelsenkirchen, Germany
51.
LeyshonA, 1994, “Under pressure: Finance, geoeconomic competition and the rise and fall of Japan's post-war growth economy”, in Money, Power and Space Eds CorbridgeSThriftN JMartinR (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) 116–146
52.
LingisA, 1994, “The postmodern economic high-growth society”Theory, Culture and Society11171–187
53.
LipietzA, 1987Mirages and Miracles: The Crises of Global Fordism (Verso, London)
54.
LipietzA, 1992aTowards a New Economic Order: Postfordism, Ecology and Democracy (Polity Press, Cambridge)
55.
LipietzA, 1992b, “The regulation approach and capitalist crisis; an alternative compromise for the 1990s”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe: The Global—Local Interplay and Spatial Development Strategies Eds DunfordMKafkalasG (Belhaven Press, London) pp 309–334
56.
LipietzA, 1992c, “Toyotism nihon wo meguru kokusai ronso to post-Fordism” [Post-Fordism and the international debate around Toyotist Japan]Kansai University Keizai Ronshu42(1) 99–115
57.
MaruyamaK, 1989Nihon-teki keiei: Sono kozo to behaviour [Japanese management: Its structure and behaviour] (Nihon Hyoron-sya, Tokyo)
58.
MaruyamaK, 1993a, “Nihon-gata kigyo shakai to nihon-teki seisan system” [Japan's corporate-oriented society and the Japanese production system]Keizai Hyoron93(3) 122–139
59.
MaruyamaK, 1993b, “Nihon-teki seisan system ha post-Fordism ka (ge)” [Is the Japanese production system post-Fordist? (part 2)]Keizai Hyoron93(2) 44–56
60.
MatsuhashiKTogashiK, 1988, “Locational dynamics and spatial structures in the Japanese manufacturing industries: A review on the Japanese industrial restructuring process of leading sectors”Geographical Review of Japan61B(1) 174–189
61.
MilkmanR, 1991Japan's California Factories: Labor Relations and Economic Globalization Monograph and Research Series 55 (Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California, Los Angeles, CA)
MorishimaM, 1982Why has Japan Succeeded? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
64.
MurakamiY, 1987, “The Japanese model of political economy”, in The Political Economy of Japan: Volume 1—The Domestic Transformation Eds YamamuraKYasubaY (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) pp 33–91
65.
MurrayR, 1989, “Fordism and post-Fordism”, in New Times Eds HallSJacquesM (Lawrence and Wishart, London) pp 38–53
66.
NakamuraT, 1985Economic Development of Modern Japan (Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tokyo)
67.
NakanoC, 1989, “Principles of humanistic enterprise in Japan: A new economic system of the future”Futures21640–646
68.
NakaseT, 1979, “The introduction of scientific management in Japan and its characteristics — case studies of companies in the Sumito Zaibatsu”, in Labor and Management Ed. NakagawaK (Tokyo University Press, Tokyo) pp 171–202
69.
NoharaHFujitaE, 1989Jidosha sangyo to rodosha [Workers in the car industry] (Horitsu Bunka-sha, Tokyo)
70.
NomuraM, 1992, “Nihon kigyo to Taylor shugi” [Japanese firms and Taylorism], in After-Fordism to nihon [After-Fordism and Japan] Eds IidaMYamadaT (Ochanomizu-shobo, Tokyo) pp 15–28
71.
OgawaE, 1983, “Nihon kigyo no seisan system” [The Japanese production system]Business Review30(3/4) 102–119
72.
OkishioN, 1992, “Keiki junkan wo meguru futatsu no michi” [Two ways to cope with economic fluctuation]Keizainumber 339, 8–11
73.
PeckJ ATickellA, 1994a, “The social regulation of uneven development: ‘regulatory deficit’, England's South East and the collapse of Thatcherism”Environment and Planning A forthcoming
74.
PeckJ ATickellA, 1994b, “Searching for a new institutional fix: The after-Fordist crisis and global-local disorder”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) forthcoming
75.
PioreM JSabelC, 1984The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York)
76.
SaitoH, 1991, “Regulation no minshu shugi-teki soshutsu ni mukatte” [Towards the creation of democratic forms of social regulation], in Post-Fordism Eds YamadaTSudoO (Ohmura-shoten, Tokyo) pp 81–103
77.
SakamotoK, 1992, “Kokusai kyoso-ryoku to nihon-teki seisan system no tokushitsu” [The Japanese production system and its international competitiveness]Osaka-shiritsu Daigaku Keiei Kenkyu43(1)21–44
78.
SayerAWalkerR, 1992The New Social Economy: Reworking the Division of Labor (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA)
ShinodaT, 1989, “Fordism no kiki to nihon-gata seisan taisei” [The crisis of Fordism and the Japanese production system]Ritsumeikan Sangyo Shakai Ronsyu25(1) 91–125
81.
ShinodaT, 1992, “After-Fordism no paradigm tenkan” [The paradigm shift in after-Fordism]Ritsumeikan Sangyo Shakai Ronsyu28(2) 111–186
82.
StevenR, 1990Japan's New Imperialism (Macmillan, London)
83.
SwyngedouwE, 1992, “The Mammon quest. ‘Glocalisation’, interspatial competition and the monetary order: The construction of new scales”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe: The Global-Local Interplay and Spatial Development Strategies Eds DunfordMKafkalasG (Belhaven Press, London) pp 39–67
84.
TeagueP, 1990, “The political economy of the regulation school and the flexible specialisation scenario”Journal of Economic Studies1732–54
85.
TickellAPeckJ A, 1992, “Accumulation, regulation and the geographies of post-Fordism: Missing links in regulationist research”Progress in Human Geography16190–218
86.
TohyamaH, 1990a, “Kodo keizai seicho-ki ni okeru chin rodo keitai” [Wage labour relations in the period of rapid economic growth]Keizai-gaku Zassi91(1) 70–89
87.
TohyamaH, 1990b, “Nihon ni okeru kodo seicho to kiki” [Rapid economic growth and the crisis in Japan]Keizai Hyoron39(4) 62–74
88.
TohyamaH, 1991, “Nihon shihon shugi no choki-teki kouzou to hen-yo” [Long-term change and the structure of Japanese capitalism]Keizai Seminarnumber 433, 33–39
89.
UniH, 1991, “Sengo nihon shihon shugi to Fordism” [Post-War Japanese capitalism and Fordism]Keizai Hyoron40(11) 33–48
90.
UniH, 1992, “Sengo nihon no chikuseki taisei” [The accumulation system in postwar Japan]Keizaigaku Zasshi92(5/6) 43–59
91.
VogelE, 1979Japan as Number One (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
92.
WebberM, 1982, “Agglomeration and the regional question”Antipode141–11
93.
WilliamsKHaslamCWilliamsJ, 1992, “Ford versus Fordism: The beginnings of mass production?”Work, Employment and Society6517–555
YamadaT, 1993Régulation Rirou [The theory of regulation] (Kodan-sha, Tokyo)
96.
YuasaY, 1990, “Nihon-teki seisan system to rodo katei ronso” [The Japanese production system and labour process debates]Ehime Keizai Ronshu10(1) 153–170
