The author presents an empirical example of the systematic distortion of information and the consequent impacts in a particular planning context. In so doing, she raises issues of professionalism, ethics, and democracy, Habermas's consideration of communicative action is of value in such analysis. She further reveals, however, that Habermassian thought tends to demonstrate a significant blindness to the role of power in such interaction. Consideration of Foucault's ideas, with regard to the manifold relations of power which characterise and constitute society, thus add an extra dimension to the work. In a strategic linking of the two the author attempts to demonstrate how communicative action can illuminate the analysis of power relationships in a manner useful to planning theory and practice. The paper concludes with a development of the Habermas-Foucault framework into a proposal for discursive democracy in an attempt to enable achievement of negotiated planning policies through a process of planning through debate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BolnnR, 1985, “The structure of ethical choice in planning practice”, in Ethics in Planning Ed. WachsM (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 70–89
2.
Bond Corporation Holdings Ltd., 1987, “Knightsbridge, City Beach Public Environmental Report”, St George's Terrace, Perth, WA
3.
CalvinoI, 1972Invisible Cities (Picador, London)
4.
ClarkGDearM, 1984State Apparatus: Structures and Language of Legitimacy (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA)
5.
ColesR, 1989The Call of Stories (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA)
DCE, 1981The Dating System: The System Six StudyDepartment of Conservation and Environment (Environmental Protection Authority), St George's Terrace, Perth, WA
8.
DearM, 1989, “Survey 16. Privatization and the rhetoric of planning practice”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7449–462
9.
DryzckJ, 1990Discursive Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
EastonJ, 1991, “Case study evaluation”, Paper presented to Planning and Politics 356, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Curttn University, Perth, WA
11.
EdelmanM, 1964The Symbolic Use of Politics (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
12.
EPA, 1988Report and Recommendations of the EPAEnvironmental Protection Authority, St George's Terrace, Perth, WA
13.
FBPB, 1989, “Bold Park and adjacent bushland”, Friends of Bold Park Bushland, Hornsey Road, Floreat, Perth, WA
14.
FischerFForesterJ (Eds), 1987Confronting Values in Policy Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
15.
Floreat Post1987a, “Bold Park's friends ask for delay on site”, 21 April, page 9
16.
1987b, “Bond Park” idea to save bushland”, 30 June, page 8
17.
1987c, “Crowd fears for all of Bold Park”, 1 September, page 4
1988, “Lot 1 meeting told: Bond took fiscal risk”, 9 February, page 9 (Floreat Post is a weekly newspaper; back issues are held at Editorial Office, Keighley Road, Subica, WA)
20.
ForesterJ, 1987, “Teaching and studying planning practice”Journal of Planning Education and Research6116–137
21.
ForesterJ, 1988, “Critical theory and planning practice”, in Critical Theory and Public Life Ed. ForesterJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 202–227
22.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
23.
ForesterJ, 1991, “Practice stories and the priority of practical judgment”, Paper presented at Joint Conference of the Association of European Schools of Planning and American Collegiate Schools of Planning, Oxford; copy available from the author, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
24.
FoucaultM, 1982, “The subject and power”Critical Inquiry8777–795
25.
FriedanB, 1963The Feminine Mystique (W W Norton, New York)
26.
GameA, 1991Undoing the Social (Open University Press, Milton Keynes)
27.
GeertzC, 1983Local Knowledge (Basic Books, New York)
28.
GilliganC, 1982In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
29.
GoodwinC, 1988, “The heterogeneity of the economists' discourse: Philospher, priest and hired gun”, in The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 207–220
HabermasJ, 1979Communication and the Evolution of Society (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
36.
HabermasJ, 1984The Theory of Communicative Action I. Reason and the Rationalisation of Society (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
37.
HabermasJ, 1987The Theory of Communicative Action II. Lifeworld and the System (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
38.
HallS, 1988, “Brave new world”Marxism Today 28 October, pp 28–29
39.
HealeyP, 1991, “Debates in planning thought”, in Dilemmas of Planning Practice Eds. ThomasHHealeyP (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants) pp 11–33
40.
HealeyP, 1993, “Planning through debate”, in The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning Eds FischerFForesterJ (Duke University Press, USA) forthcoming
41.
HillierJ, 1991, “Deconstructing the discourse of planning”, Paper presented to Joint Committee of the Association of European Schools of Planning and American Collegiate Schools of Planning, Oxford: copy available from the author
42.
HillierJ, 1992, “Discursive democracy”, paper submitted toJournal of Planning Education and Research
43.
HillierJ, 1993, “Discursive democracy in action”, paper to be presented at Association of European Schools of Planning, Lodz, Poland, forthcoming; copy available from author
44.
HowittR, 1989, “Social impact assessment: Lessons from the Australian experience”Australian Geographer20153–166
45.
HowittR, 1992, “Industrialisation impact assessment and empowerment”, Paper presented to New Zealand Geographical Society and Australian Geographical Union, Auckland; copy available from the author, Department of Geography, University of Sydney, Sydney
46.
JackRJackD, 1989Moral Visions and Professional Decisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
47.
JonesP, 1991, “Case study evaluation”, Paper presented to Planning and Politics 356, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth, WA
48.
KitchenT, 1991, “A client-based view of the planning service”, in Dilemmas of Planning Practice Eds. ThomasHHealeyP (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants) pp 115–142
49.
KlostermanR, 1985, “Foundations for normative planning”, in Ethics in Planning Ed. WachsM (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 50–69
50.
KrumholzNForesterJ, 1990Making Equity Planning Work (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
51.
LoganJMolotchH, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
52.
LyotardJ-F, 1985Just Gaming (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
53.
McGeeMLyneJ, 1987, “What are nice folks like you doing in a place like this?”, in The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences Eds NelsonJMegillAMcCloskeyD (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
54.
McManusP, 1991, Unpublished poems available from author, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth
55.
MajoneG, 1989Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
56.
MandelbaumS, 1988, “Open moral communities”Society November/December, pp 20–27
57.
Norton LongE, 1959, “Planning and politics in urban development”Journal of the American Institute of Planners25167–169
58.
NussbaumM, 1990Love's Knowledge (Oxford University Press, New York)
59.
O'NeillJ, 1988, “Decolonisation and the ideal speech community”, in Critical Theory and Public Life Ed. ForesterJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 57–76
60.
PrattA C, 1991, “Discourses of locality”Environment and Planning A23257–266
61.
PredA, 1989, “Survey 14: The locally spoken word and local struggles”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7211–233
62.
RabinowP, 1984The Foucault Reader (Pantheon Books, New York)
63.
SayerA, 1991, “Behind the locality debate: Deconstructing geography's dualisms”Environment and Planning A23283–308
64.
ScottJ, 1985Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
65.
ShapiroM, 1989, “A political approach to language purism”, in The Politics of Language Purism Eds. JernuddBShapiroM (Mouton de Gruyter, New York) pp 21–29
66.
ThomasH, 1991a, “Innovations in the planning of urban areas: Ethical and practical dilemmas for the planner”, in Town Planning Responses to City Change Eds NadinVDoakJ (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants) pp 225–238
67.
ThomasH, 1991b, “Professionalism, power and planners”, in Dilemmas of Planning Practice Eds ThomasHHenleyP (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants) pp 34–47
68.
ThrogmortonJ, 1991a, “The rhetorics of policy analysis”Policy Sciences24153–179
69.
ThrogmortonJ, 1991b, “Planning as persuasive discourse: Defending the credibility of survey research”, Paper presented at Joint Conference of the Association of European Schools of Planning and American Collegiate Schools of Planning, Oxford; copy available from the author, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
70.
TrontoJ, 1987, “Beyond gender difference to a theory of care”Signs12644–663
71.
WachsM, 1985Ethics in Planning (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ)
72.
West Australian1987, “EPA halts Bold Park land plans”, 25 April, page 1, West Australian Newspapers Ltd., St. George's Terrace, Perth, WA.
73.
WhiteS, 1988The Recent Work of Jurgen Habermas (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
74.
WildavskyA, 1973, “If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing”Policy Sciences4127–153
75.
WilliamsW C, 1966, “The Flower”Collected Earlier Poems (New Directions, New York) pp 236–237
76.
YoungI, 1990Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princetown University Press, Princeton, NJ)
