Feminism, decolonization, and ‘new social movements’ have decentered the geopolitical power of the ‘First World’ and ruptured the relations of exploitation, domination, and imperialism that undergird it and the authority of the white, male, ruling class, Western subject. The tensions and reorientations in the macrological sphere resonate in social and cultural discourse where feminist theory, poststructuralism, and subaltern studies have called into question the subject positions associated with these relations of power. Rather than making clear that all observers and commentators stand someplace, this ‘sea change’ left many intellectuals adrift, flirting with disabling relativism. Given the projects of representing how others stand and understanding the ground on which they stand, ethnographers have been late to recognize their complicity in masking their own positions as they construct the objects of their inquiry. As intellectuals operating in a postcolonial world, we must take seriously Spivak's admonition about representation as a staging of the world in a political context and begin to connect the ‘micrological textures of power’ with larger political-economic relations. In this expanded field, we can no longer valorize the concrete experience of oppressed peoples while remaining uncritical of our role as intellectuals. Neither can we presume to speak for or about peoples and nations as if they were outside of the contemporary world system, refusing to recognize that our ability to construct them as such is rooted in a larger system of domination. In this paper the author develops these themes by offering a critique of familiar modes and practices of representation and draws on ethnographic research in New York City and rural Sudan to argue that by interrogating the subject positions of ourselves as intellectuals as well as the objects of our inquiry we can excavate a ‘space of betweenness’ wherein the multiple determinations of a decentered world are connected. Appropriating this knowledge we may develop enabling analyses of power and difference to find collective paths toward change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminS, 1974Accumulation on a World Scale2 volumes (Monthly Review Press, New York)
2.
AnzalduaG, (Ed.), 1990Making Face, Making Soul = Haciendo Caras: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Women of Color (Aunt Lute Foundation Books, San Francisco, CA)
3.
AsadT, 1973Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter (Ithaca Press, London)
4.
BarthesR, 1957Mythologies translated by A Lavers (Hill and Wang, New York)
5.
Bilal Omer elH, 1985The Danagla Traders of Northern Sudan: Rural Capitalism and Agricultural Development (Ithaca Press, London)
6.
ChristophersonS, 1989, “On being outside ‘the project’”Antipode21(2) 83–89
7.
CliffordJ, 1986a, “Introduction: Partial truths”, in Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography Eds CliffordJMarcusG E, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 1–26
8.
CliffordJ, 1986b, “On ethnographic allegory”, in Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography Eds CliffordJMarcusG E, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 98–121
9.
CliffordJ, 1987, “Of other peoples: Beyond the ‘salvage paradigm’”, in Discussions in Contemporary Culture, 1 Ed. FosterH, (Bay Press, Seattle, WA)” pp 121–129
10.
CliffordJ, 1988The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography Literature and Art (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
11.
CliffordJMarcusG E, (Eds), 1986Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
12.
CrapanzanoV, 1980Tuhami: Portrait of a Moroccan (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
13.
CostaM Dalla, 1972, “Women and the subversion of the community”, in The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community Eds CostaM DallaJamesS, (Falling Wall Press, Bristol) pp 19–54
14.
DerridaJ, 1976Of Grammatology (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
15.
DeutschRRyanC G, 1984, “The fine art of gentrification”October13151–171
16.
el HassanI S, 1980On ideology: The Place of Religion in Northern SudanPhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
17.
FabianJ, 1983Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object (Columbia University Press, New York)
18.
FahimH, (Ed.), 1982Indigenous Anthropology in Non-Western Countries (Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NC)
19.
FischerM M J, 1986, “Ethnicity and the post-modern arts of memory”, in Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography Eds CliffordJMarcusG E, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 194–233
20.
FloresJYudiceG, 1990, “Multiculturalism”,City University of New York Center for Cultural Studies Symposium, New York, December
21.
FosterH, 1985Recodings: Art, Spectacle, Cultural Politics (Bay Press, Port Townsend, WA)
22.
GainesAHahnR, (Eds), 1982, “Physicians of Western medicine: Five cultural studies”, special issue ofCulture, Medicine, Psychiatry6(3)
23.
GeertzC, 1973The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books, New York)
24.
GeertzC, 1979, “From the native's point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding”, in Interpretive Social Science: A Reader Eds RabinowPSullivanW N, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 225–241
25.
GodlewskaASmithN, (Eds) Geography and Empire: Critical Studies in the History of Geography forthcoming
26.
GoffmanE, 1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, New York)
27.
GramsciA, 1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks (International Publishers, New York)
28.
GuhaRSpivakG C, (Eds), 1988Selected Subaltern Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
29.
HarawayD J, 1985, “A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s”Socialist Review8065–107
30.
HarawayD J, 1988, “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism as a site of discourse on the privilege of partial perspective”Feminist Studies14575–599
31.
HartsockN, 1987, “Rethinking modernism: Minority vs majority theories”Culture Critique7187–206
32.
HudsonB, 1977, “The new geography and the new imperialism, 1870–1918”Antipode9(2) 12–19
33.
HymesD, 1973Reinventing Anthropology (Vintage Books, New York)
34.
KatzC, 1990, “A cable to cross a curse; everyday cultural practices of resistance and reproduction among youth in New York City”, unpublished manuscript, copy available from the author
35.
KatzC, 1991, “Sow what you know: The struggle for social reproduction in rural Sudan”Annals of the Association of American Geographers81488–514
36.
KatzCKirbyA, 1991, “In the nature of things: The environment and everyday life”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers16259–271
37.
KirbyA, 1991, “What did you do in the war, daddy?”, paper presented at the Geography and Empire symposium, Kingston, Ontario, April; copy available from the author
38.
KoptiuchK, 1985, “Fieldwork in the postmodern world: Notes on ethnography in an expanded field”, paper presented at the eighty-second annual meeting of the American Anthropology Association, Chicago, IL, November; copy available from the author
39.
KraussR, 1983, “Sculpture in the expanded field”, in The And Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture Ed. FosterH, (Bay Press, Port Townsend, WA) pp 31–42
40.
LatourBWoolgarS, 1979Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage, Beverley Hills, CA)
41.
LefebvreH, 1984Everyday Life in the Modern World (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ)
42.
LazregM, 1988, “Feminism and difference: The perils of writing as a woman on women in Algeria”Feminist Studies14(1) 81–107
43.
MarcusG E, (Ed.), 1983Elites: Ethnographic Issues (University of New Mexico Press, Alburquerque, NM)
44.
MarcusG E, 1986, “Contemporary problems of ethnography in the modern world system”, in Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography Eds CliffordJMarcusG E, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 165–193
45.
MarcusG EFischerM M J, 1986Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
46.
MiesM, 1986Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women and the International Division of Labour (Zed Press, London)
47.
MohantyC T, 1984, “Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourse”Boundary2/3(12/13) 333–358
48.
MohantyC T, 1988, “Feminist encounters: Locating the politics of experience”Copyright130–44
49.
MontgomeryS L, 1988, “The world as ornament: Thoughts onNational Geographic” Central Park1371–80
50.
MoragaCAnzalduaG, (Eds), 1981This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color (Persephone Press, Watertown, MA)
51.
MullingsL, (Ed.), 1987Cities in the United States: Studies in Urban Anthropology (Columbia University Press, New York)
52.
OngA, 1987Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
53.
PrattM L, 1986, “Scratches on the face of the country; or, what Mr. Barrow saw in the land of the Bushmen”, in “Race”, Writing, and Difference Ed. GatesH LJr, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 138–162
54.
RabinowP, 1977Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
55.
RabinowP, 1986, “Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology”, in Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography Eds CliffordJMarcusG E, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 234–261
56.
RothenbergT Y, 1992, “Voyeurs of imperialism: The National Geographic magazine before World War II”, in Geography and Empire: Critical Studies in the History of Geography Eds GodlewskaASmithN, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
57.
RundstromR AKenzerM S, 1989, “The decline of fieldwork in human geography”Professional Geographer41294–303
58.
SaidE, 1978Orientalism (Pantheon, New York)
59.
SaidE, 1989, “Representing the colonized: Anthropology's interlocutors”Critical Inquiry15205–225
60.
SmithN, 1989, “Geography as museum: Private history and the nature of idealism in The Nature of Geography”, in Reflections on Richard Hartshorne's The Nature of Geography Eds EntrikinJ NBrunnS, (Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC) pp 91–120
61.
SmithN, 1991Uneven Development(Basil Blackwell, Oxford) 2nd edition, originally published 1984
62.
SorensonE R, 1976The Edge of the Forest: Land, Childhood and Change in a New Guinea Proto-agricultural Society (Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC)
63.
SpivakG C, 1988, “Can the subaltern speak?”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL, (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) pp 271–313
64.
StackC, 1974All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community (Harper and Row, New York)
65.
SusserI, 1982Norman Street: Poverty and Politics in an Urban Neighborhood (Oxford University Press, New York)
66.
TrinhT M, 1986–87, “Difference: ‘a special Third World women issue’”Discourse811–38
67.
TrinhT M, 1988, “Not you/like you: Post-colonial women and the interlocking questions of identity and difference”Inscriptions issue 3/4, 71–77
68.
TrinhT M, 1989Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism (University of Indiana Press, Bloomington, IN)
