In the first section of the paper a few general remarks concerning three lineages of universalism are outlined; these comments act as an introduction to a more detailed examination of ‘Euro-Americanism’. In this second section, the main focus of analysis falls on examples taken from the literature of critical urban studies. In the final part, a briefly stated case is made for learning from the South. It is suggested that it is not only crucial to question all forms of Western ethnocentrism, but that by scrutinizing critically the historical constitution of the relations between the First World and the societies of the periphery, the realities of the West can be better comprehended. In fact, it is argued that without such a connection First World geographers will not be able to grasp the meanings and dispositions of the societies in which they live, and in this important sense will remain ‘intellectual prisoners of the West’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArditiB, 1987, “Una gramática postmoderna para pensar lo social”, in Cultura Política y Democratización Ed. LechncrN, (Conçejo Latinoamenicano de Ciencias Sociales, Buenos Aires) pp 169–188.
2.
BaudrillardJ, 1975The Mirror of Production (Telos, St Louis, MO).
3.
BaudrillardJ, 1983In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities(Semiotext(e), New York).
4.
BaudrillardJ, 1989America (Verso, London).
5.
BermanM, 1982All That is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity (Verso, London).
6.
BhabhaH, 1990, “The third space”, in Identity: Community, Culture, Difference Ed. RutherfordJ, (Lawrence and Wishart, London) pp 207–221.
7.
CocksJ, 1989The Oppositional Imagination: Feminism, Critique and Political Theory (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants).
8.
CookeP, 1989, “The contested terrain of locality studies”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie80(1) 14–29.
9.
DallmayrF, 1989Margins of Political Discourse (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).
10.
DavisH, (Ed.), 1976The National Question: Selected Writings by Rosa Luxemburg (Monthly Review Press, New York).
11.
DeleuzeGGuattariF, 1984Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Athlone Press, London).
12.
DerridaJ, 1976Of Grammatology (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
13.
DerridaJ, 1981Positions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
14.
DerridaJ, 1985, “Racism's last word”, in “Race”, Writing, and Difference Ed. GatesH LJr, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 329–338.
15.
EngelsF, 1968, “Persia and China”, in On Colonialism K Marx, F Engels (Progress Publishers, Moscow) pp 120–125.
16.
FabianJ, 1983Time and the Other (Columbia University Press, New York).
17.
FabianJ, 1991, “Dilemmas of critical anthropology”, in Constructing Knowledge: Authority and Critique in Social Science Eds NencelLPelsP, (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) pp 180–202.
18.
FanonF, 1969The Wretched of the Earth (Penguin Books, Harmondworth, Middlesex).
19.
FergusonR, 1990, “The invisible center”, in Out There: Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures Eds FergusonRGeverMMinha-HaT TWestC, (The New Museum of Contemporary Art and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) pp 9–14.
20.
Folch-SerraM, 1989, “Geography and post-modernism: Linking humanism and development studies”The Canadian Geographer33(1) 66–75.
21.
FoucaultM, 1970The Order of Things: The Archaeology of the Human Sciences (Random House, New York).
22.
FoucaultM, 1986, “Of other spaces”Diacritics (Spring) 22–27.
23.
GaneM, 1990, “Ironies of postmodernism: Fate of Baudrillard's fatalism”Economy and Society19314–333.
24.
GatesH LJr, 1985, “Introduction: Writing ‘race’ and the difference it makes”, in “Race”, Writing and Difference Ed. GatesH LJr, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 1–20.
25.
GregoryD, 1989, “The crisis of modernity? Human geography and critical social theory”, in New Models in Geography, Volume 2 Eds PeetRThriftN, (Unwin Hyman, London) pp 348–385.
26.
HabermasJ, 1987The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (Polity Press, Cambridge).
27.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Postmodernity (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
28.
HebdigeD, 1990, “Subjects in space”New Formations number 11 (Summer) v–x.
29.
HegelG W F, 1967Philosophy of Right translated by KnoxT M, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
30.
HinkelammertF J, 1987, “Utopia y Proyecto Político: La cultura de la posmodernidad”Nueva Sociedad number 91 (September-October) pp 114–140.
31.
HuyssenA, 1984, “Mapping the postmodern”New German Critique33 (Fall) 5–52.
32.
JamesonF, 1988, “Cognitive mapping”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL, (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL) pp 347–357.
33.
JamesonF, 1989a, “Marxism and postmodernism”New Left Review176 (July/August) 31–45.
34.
JamesonF, 1989b, “Regarding postmodernism: A conversation with A Stephanson”, in Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism Ed. RossA, (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh) pp 3–30.
35.
JulienIMercerK, 1988, “Introduction: De margin and de centre”Screen29(4) 2–10.
36.
LaclauE, 1990New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time (Verso, London).
37.
LaclauE, 1991, “Interview: What comes after 1991?”Marxism Today (October) 16–19.
38.
LarrainJ, 1989Theories of Development (Polity Press, Cambridge).
39.
LechnerN, (Ed.), 1987Cultura Politica y Democratización (Conçejo Latinoamenicano de Ciencias Sociales, Santiago de Chile).
LefebvreH, 1974La Production de L'Espace (Editions Anthropos, Paris).
42.
LefebvreH, 1976aThe Survival of Capitalism: Reproduction of the Relations of Production (Allison and Busby. London).
43.
LefebvreH, 1976b, “Reflections on the politics of space”Antipode8(2) 30–37.
44.
LefebvreH, 1988, “Toward a leftist cultural politics: Remarks occasioned by the centenary of Marx's death”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL, (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL) pp 75–88.
45.
LyotardJ-F, 1986The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Manchester University Press, Manchester).
46.
LyotardJ-F, 1988The Differend: Phrases in Dispute (Manchester University Press, Manchester).
47.
MarxK, 1968, “The future results of the British rule in India”, in On Colonialism Eds MarxKEngelsF, (Progress Publishers, Moscow) pp 81–87.
48.
Mascia-LeesF ESharpePCohenC B, 1989, “The postmodernist turn in anthropology: Cautions from a feminist perspective”Signs15(1) 7–33.
49.
MelucciA, 1989Nomads of the Present (Hutchinson Radius, London).
50.
MohantyC, 1988, “Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses”Feminist Review 30 (Autumn) 61–88.
51.
NimniE, 1985, “Marxism and nationalism”, in Marxist Sociology Revisited Ed. ShawM, (Macmillan, London) pp 99–142.
52.
OwensC, 1985, “The discourse of others: Feminists and postmodernism”, in Postmodern Culture Ed. FosterH, (Pluto Press, London) pp 57–82.
53.
PanthamT, 1988, “On modernity, rationality and morality: Habermas and Gandhi”Indian Journal of Social Science1187–208.
54.
PoppiC, 1991, “From the suburbs of the global village”Third Text14 (Spring) 85–96.
55.
ProbynE, 1990, “Travels in the postmodern: Making sense of the local”, in Feminism/Postmodernism Ed. NicholsonL, (Routledge, Chapman and Mall, Andover, Hants) pp 176–189.
56.
ReigadasM C, 1988, “Neomodernidad y posmodernidad: Preguntado desde América Latina”, in ¿Posmodernidad? Ed. MariE, (Editorial Biblos, Buenos Aires) pp 113–145.
57.
RichardN, 1987/88, “Postmodernism and periphery”Third Text2 (Winter) 5–12.
58.
RortyR, 1985, “Habermas and Lyotard on postmodemity”, in Habermas and Modernity Ed. BernsteinR J, (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 161–175.
ShaninT, (Ed.), 1983Late Marx and the Russian Road: Marx and the ‘Peripheries of Capitalism’ (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants).
62.
SlaterD, 1987, “On development theory and the Warren thesis: Arguments against the predominance of economism”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5263–282.
63.
SlaterD, 1989, “Peripheral capitalism and the regional problematic”, in New Models in Geography, Volume 2 Eds PeetRThriftN, (Unwin Hyman, London) pp 267–294.
64.
SlaterD, 1992, “Theories of development and politics of the post-modern: Exploring a border zone”Development and Change23283–319.
SpivakG, 1988a, “Practical politics of the open end: An interview with Sarah Marasym”Canadian Journal of Political and Social TheoryXII(1–2) 51–69.
67.
SpivakG, 1988b, “Can the subaltern speak?”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL, (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL) pp 271–313.
68.
SpivakG, 1988c, “Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography”, in Selected Subaltern Studies Eds GuhaRSpivakG, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 3–32.
69.
WarrenB, 1980Imperialism—The Pioneer of Capitalism (Verso, London).
70.
WestC, 1990, “The new cultural politics of difference”, in Out There: Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures Eds FergusonRGeverMMinha-HaT TWestC, (The New Museum of Contemporary Art and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) pp 19–36.
