Over the last two decades, there have been numerous advancements in theorising the significance of subnational territories within both the global economy and nation-states. Within the United Kingdom over the last few years, academic study has tended to concentrate on the ‘new regionalism’ and the rescaling of political processes caused by the ‘hollowing out’ of the nation-state and governmental devolution and decentralisation to the subnational level. Part of the reason for this push towards a renewed interest in regional governance and policy processes has been the autonomous institutional capacities of regions to harness regional economic development with planning processes. The new regionalism (a contentious label) has occurred throughout the United Kingdom, but has been implemented separately in each country, through the creation of Regional Development Agencies in the English regions, and new politically accountable elected forums in Wales and Scotland. In this paper, we provide one of the first attempts empirically to analyse the new institutional structures through a survey of agencies across Britain—in England, Scotland, and Wales—in order to provide a comparative assessment of evolving forms of regional governance. We illustrate a mixed reaction from public-policy stakeholders with concern over the ability of these new forums to develop a capacity to harness both economic development and planning policy processes. On a more conceptual level, the research indicates uncertainty over both the future spatial dimension of planning processes and the scale links between the new regional level and the existing national and local levels of governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminA, 1999, “An institutional perspective on regional economic development”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23365–378.
2.
AminAThriftN, 1992, “Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16571–587.
3.
AminAThriftN, 1995, “Globalisation, institutional ‘thickness’ and the local economy”, in Managing Cities: The New Urban Context Eds HealeyPCameronSDavoudiSGrahamSMandani-PourA, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 91–108.
4.
BakerM, 1998, “Planning for the English regions: A review of the Secretary of State's Regional Planning Guidance”Planning Practice and Research13153–169.
5.
BakerMDeasIWongC, 1999, “Obscure ritual or administrative luxury? Integrating strategic planning and regional development”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26763–782.
6.
BatchlerJTurokI, (Eds), 1997The Coherence of EU Regional Policy (Jessica Kingsley, London).
7.
BCC, 1997Regional Policy (British Chambers of Commerce, London).
8.
BrennerN, 1999, “Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The rescaling of urban governance in the European Union”Urban Studies36431–451.
9.
CBI, 1997Regions for Business: Improving Policy Design and Delivery (Confederation of British Industry, London).
CookePMorganK, 1993, “The network paradigm: New departures in corporate and regional development”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11543–564.
12.
CookePMorganK, 1998The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
13.
CPRE, 1994, “Greening the regions: A review and assessment of current practice”, Council for the Protection of Rural England, Warwick House, 25 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0PP.
14.
DeasIWardK G, 1999, “From the ‘new localism’ to the ‘new regionalism’? The implications of Regional Development Agencies for city – regional relations”Political Geography19273–292.
15.
DETR, 1997Building Partnerships for Prosperity: Sustainable Growth, Competitiveness and Employment in the English Regions Cm 3814, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London).
DickenPTickellA, 1992, “Competitors or collaborators? The structure and relationships of inward investment in northern England”Regional Studies2699–106.
18.
Di MaggioP, 1993, “On metropolitan dominance: New York in the urban network”, in Capital of the American Century: The National and International Influence of New York City Ed. ShelterM, (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pp 95–114.
19.
ERA, 1998, “Regional working in England: A policy statement and survey of the English Regional Associations”; available at www.somerset.gov.uk/era/policy.htm.
20.
European Commission, 1991Europe2000 (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
21.
European Commission, 1994Europe 2000+ (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
22.
European Commission, 1999European Spatial Development Perspective (Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Luxembourg).
23.
GoodstadtVU'renG, 1999, “Which way now for Scottish planning?”Planning 22 January, page 11.
24.
HagueC, 1990, “Scotland: Back to the future for planning”, in Radical Planning Initiatives: New Directions for Urban Planning in the 1990s Eds MontgomeryJThornleyA, (Gower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 287–299.
25.
HarvieC, 1991, “English regionalism: The dog that never barked”, in National Identities Ed. CrickB, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 48–61.
26.
HaytonK, 1997Town and Country Planning July/August, pages 17–23.
27.
HM Government, 1999, “Devolution: Memorandum of understanding and supplementary agreements between the United Kingdom Government, Scottish Ministers and the Cabinet of the National Assembly for Wales”, Cm 4444 (The Stationery Office, London).
28.
HudsonRDunfordMHamiltonDKotterR, 1997, “Developing regional strategies for economic success: Lessons from Europe's economically successful regions”European Urban and Regional Studies4365–373.
29.
JonasAWardK G, 1999, “Towards new urban and regional policy frameworks for Europe: Competitive regionalism ‘bottom up’ and ‘top down’”, Paper presented to the Sixth International Conference of the Regional Studies Association, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain; copy available from Regional Studies Association, PO Box 2058, Seaford BN25 4QU.
30.
JonesM, 1999, “The regional state and economic regulation: Regional regeneration or political mobilisation?”, Paper presented to the Sixth International Conference of the Regional Studies Association, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain; copy available from Regional Studies Association, PO Box 2058, Seaford BN25 4QU.
31.
JonesMMacLeodG, 1999, “Towards a regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24295–314.
32.
KeatingM, 1997, “The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy15383–398.
33.
KendleJ, 1997Federal Britain: A History (Routledge, London).
34.
Labour Party, 1995, “A choice for England”, consultation paper, The Labour Party, Millbank Tower, Millbank, London SW1P 4GT.
35.
LoveringJ, 1997Misleading and Misreading the Welsh Economy: The New Regionalism (University of Wales Press, Cardiff).
36.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales)”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23379–395.
37.
LynchP, 1999, “New Labour and the English Regional Development Agencies: Devolution as evolution”Regional Studies31(1) 73–89.
38.
MacLeodG, 1997, ‘Institutional thickness’ and industrial governance in lowland Scotland”Area29299–311.
39.
MacLeodG, 1999, “Institutions, social capital, the state, and regulation: A sympathetic critique of the ‘new regionalism’”, Paper presented to the Sixth International Conference of the Regional Studies Association, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain; copy available from Regional Studies Association, PO Box 2058, Seaford BN25 4QU.
40.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999, “Space, scale and strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance”Progress in Human Geography23503–527.
41.
MawsonJ, 1997a, “New Labour and the English Regions. A missed opportunity?”Local Economy November, pages 194–203.
42.
MawsonJ, 1997b, “The English regional debate: Towards regional governance or government?”, in British Regionalism and Devolution: The Challenges of State Reform and European Integration Eds BradburyJMawsonJ, (Jessica Kingsley, London) pp 180–211.
43.
MawsonJSpencerK, 1997a, “The government offices for the English regions: Towards regional governance”Policy and Politics2571–84.
44.
MawsonJSpencerK, 1997b, “The origins and operations of the government offices for the Regions”, in British Regionalism and Devolution: The Challenges of State Reform and European Integration Eds BradburyJMawsonJ, (Jessica Kingsley, London) pp 158–179.
45.
MorganK, 1997, “The regional animateur: Taking stock of the Welsh Development Agency”Regional and Federal Studies7(2) 70–94.
46.
MurdochJTewdwr-JonesM, 1999, “Planning and the English regions: Conflict and convergence amongst the institutions of regional governance”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy17715–729.
47.
OhmaeK, 1996The End of the Nation State (Harper Collins, London).
48.
Paterson, 1998, “Scottish home rule: Radical break or pragmatic adjustment?”, in Remaking the Union Devolution and British Politics in the 1990s Eds ElcockHKeatingM, (Frank Cass, London) pp 78–91.
49.
PhelpsN ATewdwr-JonesM, 2000, “Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: Identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building”Environment and Planning A32111–130.
50.
PowellWDi MaggioP, (Eds), 1991The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
51.
RacoM, 1999, “Assessing ‘institutional thickness’ in the local context: A comparison of Cardiff and Sheffield”Environment and Planning A30975–996.
52.
RobertsP, 1996, “Regional planning guidance in England and Wales: Back to the future?”Town Planning Review67(1) 97–109.
53.
RobertsPLloydM G, 1999, “Institutional aspects of regional planning, management and development: Models and lessons from the English experience”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26517–531.
54.
Royal Town Planning Institute, 1992The Regional Planning Process (Royal Town Planning Institute, London).
55.
ScottA J, 1983, “Industrial organisation and logic of intra-metropolitan location I: Theoretical considerations”Economic Geography59233–250.
56.
ScottA J, 1986, “Industrial organisation and location: Division of labour, the firm and spatial processes”Economic Geography62215–231.
57.
ScottA J, 1998Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition and Political Order (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
58.
Scottish Executive, 1999The Report of The Commission on Local Government and The Scottish ParliamentScottish Executive, Edinburgh.
59.
Scottish Office, 1997Scotland's Parliament Cm 3658 (The Stationery Office, Edinburgh).
60.
StokerG, 1990, “Regulation theory, local government and transition from Fordism”, in Challenges to Local Government Eds KingDPierreJ, (Sage, London) pp 242–264.
61.
StorperM, 1997The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy (Guilford Press, New York).
62.
TEC National Council, 1997Regional Development PrinciplesTEC National Council, Centre Point, 103 New Oxford Street, London WC1A 1DR.
63.
Tewdwr-JonesMLloydM G, 1997, “Unfinished business”Town and Country Planning November, pages 302–304.
64.
Tewdwr-JonesMMcNeillD, 2000, “The politics of city-region planning and governance: Reconciling the national, regional and urban in the competing voices of institutional restructuring”European Urban and Regional Studies7119–134.
65.
Tewdwr-JonesMPhelpsN A, 2000, “Levelling the uneven playing field: Inward investment, interregional rivalry and the planning system”Regional Studies forthcoming.
66.
Town and Country Planning Association, 1997Regional Development Agencies: Ensuring Sustainable Regional Planning and DevelopmentTown and Country Planning Association, 17 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AS.
67.
ThornleyA, 1993Urban Planning Under Thatcherism: The Challenge of the Market2nd edition (Routledge, London).
68.
Welsh Office, 1997A Voice for Wales Cm 3718 (The Stationery Office, London).
