The establishment of Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) in the English regions will bring about an important change in UK regional governance. A key area of contention and struggle is likely to occur over the contribution of the RDAs to sustainable development. Although the pursuit of sustainable development is a stated goal of the RDAs, in this paper we argue that this goal is likely to be compromised by tensions and contradictions emerging in the evolving new governance landscape of England. In terms of promoting sustainable-development policy, the regional scale of the UK state is becoming materially and discursively significant, and a particular focus of struggles around economic and environmental issues. These struggles strategically intersect with wider processes of reregulation and rescaling in the UK state. We not only consider the practical policy implications of integrating the economy and environment at the regional scale, but also analyse emerging tensions in regional governance in the light of processes of social reregulation and rescaling within the UK state. We argue that theoretical approaches to the latter need to incorporate the uneven process of rescaling and the contingent nature of regional state forms and institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminA, 1999, “An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23365 – 378.
2.
AngelDJonasA E GTheyelG, 1995, “Constructing consensus: Environmental policy making in Massachusetts”Urban Geography16397 – 413.
3.
BenneworthP, 2000, “The strategies were just a warm-up; we're changing to implementation”Regions22616 – 32.
4.
BollensS A, 1997, “Fragments of regionalism: The limits of Southern California governance”Journal of Urban Affairs19105 – 122.
5.
BradburyJMawsonJ, 1997, “The changing politics and governance of British regionalism”, in British Regionalism and Devolution: The Challenges of State Reform and European Integration Eds BradburyJMawsonJ, (Jessica Kingsley, London) pp 273–309.
6.
BrennerN, 1998, “Between fixity and motion: Space, territory and place in the social production of spatial scale”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16459 – 481.
7.
BrennerN, 1999, “Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The rescaling of urban governance in the European Union”Urban Studies36431 – 451.
8.
CisnerosH G, 1995aRegionalism: The New Geography of Opportunity (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC).
9.
CisnerosH G, 1995bUrban Entrepreneurialism and National Economic Growth (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC).
10.
ClarkeS EGaileG L, 1998The Work of Cities (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
11.
CochraneA, 1999, “Redefining urban politics for the twenty-first century”, in The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later Eds JonasA E GWilsonD, (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 109–124.
12.
CocklinCBlundenG, 1998, “Sustainability, water resources and regulation”Geoforum2951 – 68.
13.
CoxK R, 1990, “Territorial structures of the state: Some conceptual issues”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie81251 – 266.
14.
CoxK RJonasA E G, 1993, “Urban development, collective consumption and the politics of metropolitan fragmentation”Political Geography128 – 37.
15.
DETR, 1997Building Partnerships for Prosperity: Sustainable Growth, Competitiveness and Employment in the English Regions Cm 3814, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London).
16.
DETR, 1998, “Regional Development Agencies: Draft guidance on RDAs' strategies”, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU.
17.
EC, 1997, “Call for tenders by open procedure number 97.00.57.001: Concerning the thematic evaluation on the impact of Structural Funds on the environment (European Commission, Brussels).
18.
EC and the Environment Agency, 1997, “Encouraging environmentally sustainable development through European Structural Fund Programmes in British regions”, recommendations from European Commission seminar, 27 – 28 October, Manchester (European Commission, Brussels).
19.
ECOTEC, 1997Sustainable Development and Employment: A Challenge for Objective 2 RegionsECOTEC, Priestley House, 28 – 34 Albert Street, Birmingham B4 7UD.
20.
EEDA, 1999aTowards a Regional Economic Development Strategy for the East of England: A Consultation DraftEast of England Development Agency, Compass House, Chivers Way, Histon, Cambridge CB4 9ZR.
21.
EEDA, 1999bTowards a Regional Economic Development Strategy for the East of England: Background PapersEast of England Development Agency, Compass House, Chivers Way, Histon, Cambridge CB4 9ZR.
22.
ENDS, 1999, “Environment struggles for a place in devolved assemblies”ENDS Report29635 – 36.
23.
EvansRHardingA, 1997, “Regionalisation, regional institutions and economic development”Policy and Politics2519 – 30.
24.
FeldmanTJonasA E G, 2000, “Sage Scrub Revolution? Property rights, political fragmentation, and conservation planning in Southern California under the federal Endangered Species Act”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90256 – 292.
25.
FeshbachDShipnukL, 1973, “Corporate regionalism in the United States'”Kapitalistate114 – 23.
26.
GibbsD C, 1998, “Regional development agencies and sustainable development”Regional Studies32365 – 368.
27.
GibbsD CJonasA E G, 2000, “Rescaling environmental policy and the utility of a regime approach”Geoforum (in press).
28.
GibbsD CLonghurstJ W SBraithwaiteC, 1998, “Struggling with sustainability: Weak and strong interpretations of sustainable development within local authority policy”, Environment and Planning A301351 – 1365.
29.
HanfK, 1996, “Implementing international environmental policies”, in Prospects for Environmental Change Eds BlowersAGlasbergenP, (Arnold, London) pp 265–278.
30.
HarmanJ, 1998, “Regional development agencies: Not the final frontier”Local Economy12194 – 197.
31.
HaughtonG, 1998, “Private profits—public drought: The creation of a crisis in water management for West Yorkshire”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series23419 – 433.
32.
HealeyPShawT, 1994, “Changing meanings of ‘environment’ in the British planning system”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series19425 – 438.
33.
HogwoodB WKeatingM, 1982Regional Government in England (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
34.
HoranCJonasA E G, 1998, “Governing Massachusetts: Uneven development and politics in metropolitan Boston”Annals of the Association of American Geographers special issue (economic geography) from the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Boston, pp 83–95.
35.
House of Commons, 1997Regional Development Agencies Bill House of Commons bills, session 1997 – 98, number 100 (The Stationery Office, London).
36.
ImrieRRacoM, 1999, “How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers2445 – 63.
37.
JacksonTRobertsP, 1997, “Greening the Fife economy: Ecological modernization as a pathway for local economic development”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management40617 – 633.
38.
JessopB, 1990State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place (Polity Press, Cambridge).
39.
JessopB, 1994, “Post-Fordism and the State”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 251–279.
40.
JessopB, 1995, “The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: Alternative perspectives on economic and political change?”Economy and Society24307 – 333.
41.
JessopB, 1998, “Governance and governance failure”, paper presented to workshop on The Future of Local Governance, University of Hull, December; copy available from the author, Department of Sociology, Cartmel College, Lancaster University, Lancaster LR1 4YN.
42.
JonasA E G, 1994, “The scale spatiality of politics”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12257 – 264.
43.
JonasA E G, 1996, “In search of order: Traditional business reformism and the crisis of neoliberalism in Massachusetts”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series21617 – 634.
44.
JonesM, 1997, “Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance”Environment and Planning A29831 – 864.
45.
JonesMMacLeodG, 1999, “Towards a regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24295 – 313.
46.
JordanA, 1999, “Editorial introduction: The construction of a multilevel environmental governance system”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy171 – 17.
47.
KeatingMLoughlinJ, 1997The Political Economy of Regionalism (Frank Cass, London).
48.
KellerA, 1997, “Strategic environmental assessment of the European Structural Fund Objective One Programme for the Highlands and Islands of Scotland”European Environment763 – 68.
49.
Kohler-KochB, 1996, “Catching up with change: The transformation of governance in the European Union”Journal of European Public Policy3359 – 380.
50.
LoganJ RMolotchH L, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
51.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy? The inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales)”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23379 – 395.
52.
LowePWardS, 1998British Environmental Policy and Europe (Routledge, London).
53.
LynchP, 1999, “New Labour and the English Regional Development Agencies: Devolution as evolution”Regional Studies3373 – 78.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999, “Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics, scale, and explanation”Political Geography18697 – 730.
56.
MarshallT, 1992, “A review of recent developments in European environmental planning”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management35129 – 144.
57.
MarshallT, 1993, “Regional environmental planning: Progress and possibilities in western Europe”European Planning Studies169 – 90.
58.
MarshallT, 1998, “The conditions for environmentally intelligence regional governance: Reflections from Lower Saxony”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management41421 – 443.
59.
MarvinSGuyS, 1997, “Creating myths rather than sustainability: The transition fallacies of the new localism”Local Environment2311 – 318.
60.
MawsonJ, 1997, “The English regional debate: Towards regional governance or government?”, in British Regionalism and Devolution: The Challenges of State Reform and European Integration, Eds BradburyJMawsonJ, (Jessica Kingsley, London) pp 180–211.
MillerB, 1994, “Political empowerment, local-central state relations, and geographically shifting political opportunity structures”Political Geography13393 – 406.
63.
NWDA, 1999England's North West: A Strategy Towards 2020. North West Development Agency, Warrington.
64.
O'BrienMPennaS, 1997, “European policy and the politics of environmental governance”Policy and Politics25185 – 200.
65.
O'ConnorJ, 1973The Fiscal Crisis of the State (St Martin's Press, New York).
66.
O'ConnorJ, 1998Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism (Guilford Press, New York).
67.
OECD, 1997Environmental Policies and Employment. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
68.
PainterJGoodwinM, 1995, “Local governance and concrete research: Investigating the uneven development of regulation”Economy and Society24334 – 356.
69.
PattersonA, 1999, “Towards a theory of regional governance”, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers), University of Leicester, January; copy available from the author, Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH.
70.
PeckJ A, 1996Workplace (Guilford Press, New York).
71.
PeckJ A, 1998, “Geographies of governance: TECs and the neo-liberalization of ‘local interests’”Space and Polity25 – 31.
72.
PerulliP, 1993, “Towards a regionalization of industrial relations”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1798 – 113.
73.
PincetlS, 1999, “The politics of influence: Democracy and the growth machine in Orange County, USA”, in The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later Eds JonasA E GWilsonD, (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 195–211.
74.
PreteceilleE, 1990, “Political paradoxes of urban restructuring: Globalization of the economy and localization of politics?”, in Beyond the City Limits Eds LoganJ RSwanstromT, (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 27–59.
75.
RPC, 1996Renewing the Regions: Strategies for Regional Economic DevelopmentRegional Policy Commission, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB.
76.
RuskD, 1993Cities without Suburbs (Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC).
77.
SaundersP, 1985, “The forgotten dimension of central – local relations: Theorising the ‘regional state’”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy3149 – 162.
78.
SaundersP, 1986Social Theory and the Urban Question (Hutchison, London).
79.
SavitchH VCollinsDSandersDMarkhamJ P, 1993, “Ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs, and the new metropolitan region”Economic Development Quarterly7341 – 358.
80.
ScottA JPaulA, 1990, “Collective order and economic coordination in industrial agglomerations: The technopoles of southern California”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy8179 – 193.
81.
SharpeL J, 1993The Rise of Meso Government in Europe (Sage, London).
82.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: “glocalization” and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK R, (Guilford Press, New York) pp 137–166.
83.
TickellAPeckJ A, 1995, “Social regulation after Fordism: Regulation theory, neoliberalism and the global-local nexus”Economy and Society24357 – 386.
84.
UK CEED, 1997Response to the Government Consultation Paper—Regional Development Agencies: Issues for DiscussionUK Centre for Economic and Environmental Development, Priestgate House, 3 – 7 Priestgate, Peterborough PE1 1JN.
WardK G, 1997, “Coalitions in urban regeneration: A regime approach”Environment and Planning A291493 – 1506.
87.
WhatmoreSBoucherS, 1993, “Bargaining with nature: The discourse and practice of environmental gain”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series18166 – 178.
88.
WhileALittlewoodSWhitneyD, (forthcoming), “A new space for sustainable development? Regional environmental governance in the North West and the West Midlands of England”Town Planning Review.
