Compared with the constitutional changes introduced elsewhere in the United Kingdom, in the English regions a more cautious approach has been adopted based on administrative decentralisation. A key feature of the government's reforms has been the strengthening of regional spatial planning and the transfer of the regional planning function to unelected regional assemblies. We examine how far these reforms have assisted regions to achieve greater discretion over planning policies and a more corporate approach to spatial planning. Our central argument is that, given the absence of elected regional government in England, there are outstanding institutional, cultural, and resource obstacles to extending regional freedoms and flexibilities. Nonetheless, the introduction of new statutory regional spatial strategies, together with a greater commitment in Whitehall to coordinate regional budgets, offers a potential way forward.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advantage West Midlands, East Midlands Development Agency, 2004Smart Growth: The Midlands WayEast Midlands Development Agency, Apex Court, City Link, Nottingham NG2 4LA
2.
AyresSPearceG, 2004, “Central government responses to governance change in the English regions”Journal of Regional and Federal Studies14255–281
3.
BakerMRobertsPShawR, 2003Stakeholder Involvement in Regional PlanningTown and Country Planning Association, 17 Carlton Crescent, London SW1Y 5AS
4.
BridgesT, 2002, “The South West”, in England: The State of the Regions Eds TomaneyJMawsonJ (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 95–108
5.
Cabinet Office, DTLR, 2002Your Region, Your Choice: Revitalising the English Regions Cabinet Office and Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
6.
CochraneA, 2002, “Thinking about the English regions”, in Contemporary Issues in Regional Planning Eds MarshallTGlassonJHeadicarP (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 23–34
7.
DETR, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
8.
DETR, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 1998The Future of Regional Planning Guidance
9.
DETR, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 2000aPPG11 Regional Planning
10.
DETR, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 2000bGuidance on Preparing Regional Sustainable Development Frameworks
11.
DETR, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 2001, “Strengthening regional accountability”, consultation paper
12.
DfT, 2004The Future of Transport Department for Transport (The Stationery Office, London)
13.
DTZ PIEDA Consulting, 2002Prioritisation in the East of EnglandDTZ PIEDA, Greyfriars Gate, 5 Greyfriars Road, Reading RG1 1NU
14.
ElcockH, 2001, “A surfeit of strategies? Governing and governance in the North East of England”Public Policy and Administration Journal1659–74
15.
ERA, 2004The East of England Plan: Draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the East of England Regional Planning Panel and Secretariat, 5 November, Eastern Regional Assembly, Flempton House, Flempton, Bury St Edmonds, Suffolk IP28 6EG
16.
European Commission, 1999European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balance and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union (Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Brussels)
17.
GlassonJ, 2002, “Some interim conclusions”, in Contemporary Issues in Regional Planning Eds MarshallTGlassonJHeadicarP (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 247–264
18.
GONW, 2003Regional Planning Guidance for the North West: RPG 13Government Office for the North West, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester M1 4BE
19.
GOWM, 2004Regional Planning Guidance for the West Midlands: RPG 11Government Office for the West Midlands, 5 St Phillip's Place, Colmore Row, Birmingham B3 2PW
20.
HaughtonGCounsellD, 2004Regions, Spatial Strategies and Sustainable Development (Routledge, London)
21.
HealeyP, 2004, “The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2845–67
22.
HM Treasury, London
23.
HM Treasury, London, 2003, “Spending review 2004: regional emphasis documents”, letter to Government Office Directors, Regional Development Agency Chief Executives, and Regional Assemblies
24.
HM Treasury, London, 2004Opportunity for All: The Strength to Take the Long-term Decisions for Britain pre-budget report (The Stationery Office, London)
25.
HM Treasury, Department of Trade and Industry, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2004Devolving Decision Making: 2—Meeting the Regional Economic Challenge: Increasing Regional and Local Flexibility (The Stationery Office, London)
26.
HM Treasury, Department for Transport, Department for Trade and Industry, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2005Regional Funding Allocations: Guidance on Preparing Advice (The Stationery Office, London)
27.
House of Commons, 2002Empty Homes House of Commons Transport, Local Government and the Regions Select Committee (The Stationery Office, London)
28.
House of Commons, 2003Reducing Regional Disparities in Prosperity House of Commons Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Select Committee (The Stationery Office, London)
29.
JefferyCReillyA, 2004Funding Regional Assemblies: Issues and Challenges Report for the English Regions Network, Institute of German Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
30.
JohnP, 1996, “Europeanization in a centralizing state”, in The Regional Dimension of the European Union: Towards a Third Level in Europe Ed. JefferyC (Frank Cass, London) pp 131–146
31.
McLeanI, 2003“Identifying the flow of domestic and European expenditure into the English regions”, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
32.
MarinettoM, 2003, “Governing beyond the centre: A Critique of the Anglo-Governance School”Political Studies51592–608
33.
MarksGHoogheL, 2004, “Contrasting visions of multi-level governance”, in Multi-level Governance Eds BacheIFlindersM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 15–30
34.
MarshDRichardsDSmithM, 2003, “Unequal plurality, towards an asymmetric power model of the British polity”Government and Opposition38306–332
35.
MawsonJ, 1996, “The re-emergence of the regional agenda in the English regions: New patterns of urban and regional governance”Local Economy10300–326
36.
MawsonJSnapeS, 2004The Chapter 2 Agenda and Regional Assemblies: Part II The Whitehall ViewInstitute of Governance and Public Management, Warwick University, Coventry
37.
Northern Way Steering Group, 2004Moving Forward: The Northern Way: First Growth Strategy Report Sustainable CommunitiesOne North East, Stella House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle on Tyne NE15 8NY
38.
NWRA, 2002Response to Secretary of State's Proposed Changes to Draft Regional Planning Guidance for the North West letter to the Government Office for the North West, 16 August, North West Regional Assembly, Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA
39.
ODPM, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
40.
ODPM, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, 2002aSustainable Communities: Delivering Through Planning
41.
ODPM, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, 2002bMaking the System Work Better: Planning at Regional and Local Levels
42.
ODPM, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, 2004aPlanning Policy Statement II: Regional Spatial Strategies, Annex D3
43.
ODPM, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, 2004bHousing and Planning in the Regions
44.
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act, 2004Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 5 (The Stationery Office, London)
45.
RhodesR A W, 1997Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance and Accountability (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks)
46.
RobertsP, 1996, “Regional Planning Guidance in England and Wales: Back to the future?”Town Planning Review6797–109
47.
RobertsP, 1999, “Retrospect and prospect”, in Metropolitan Planning in Britain: A Comparative Study Eds RobertsPThomasKWilliamsG (Jessica Kingsley, London) pp 235–261
48.
RobertsPBakerM, 2004, “Sub-regional planning in England: Neglected opportunity or unwanted complexity”Town Planning Review75265–286
49.
SandfordM, 2001Further Steps for Regional ChambersConstitution Unit, University College, London
50.
SEERA, 2004a“No third runway for Heathrow say three regions” news release, 5 March, South East England Regional Assembly, Berkeley House, Cross Lanes, Guildford, Surrey GU1 1UN
51.
SEERA, 2004bReport of the Chairman of the Regional Planning Committee 29 November, South East England Regional Assembly, Berkeley House, Cross Lanes, Guildford, Surrey GU1 1UN
52.
SnapeSAshworthRAulakhSDobbsLMooreC, 2003The Development of Regional Scrutiny: Final ReportInstitute of Governance and Public Management, Warwick University, Coventry
53.
WardNTomaneyJ, 2002, “Regionalism in the East of England”, in England: The State of the Regions Eds TomaneyJMawsonJ (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 109–124
54.
WilliamsG, 1999, “The metropolitan framework for planning and governance”, in Metropolitan Planning in Britain: A Comparative Study Eds RobertsPThomasKWilliamsGRegional Policy and Development Series 20 (Jessica Kingsley, London) pp 42–62
