As a result of various social and economic factors, many historic townscapes in the United Kingdom and elsewhere have declined over the last half century. There have been many attempts throughout the world to revitalise such urban heritage areas, but the actual effectiveness of few of these schemes has been systematically evaluated. Good public policy choices would greatly benefit from such evaluation. The UK's Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) decided in 1999 that their Townscape Heritage Initiatives would be an exception. A research team from Oxford Brookes University was engaged to undertake a ten-year study of the £52 million being spent in about sixty British towns and cities. A sample of about one third of projects receiving HLF support are being scrutinised. The evaluation methodology is outlined, along with explanations of some challenges faced in such a large programme. The four mechanisms for gathering research data are explained, the origin and rationale for the sixteen indicators being employed are described, and the approach to overall evaluation outlined. Finally there is an overview of the baseline stage of the work, highlighting key issues from a research perspective, and briefly reflecting on findings to date.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BichmanL, (Ed.), 1987Using Program Theory in Evaluation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).
2.
ChenK, 1996Dollars and Sense of Historic Preservation: The Importance of Historic Preservation in Downtown RichmondNational Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036–2117.
3.
ConradK, 1987, “Measuring and testing program philosophy”, inUsing Program Theory in Evaluation Ed. BichmanL, (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) pp 19–42.
DelafonsJ, 1997Politics and Preservation: A Policy History of the Built Heritage 1882–1996 (Chapman and Hall, London).
7.
DenhezMDennisS, (Eds), 1997Legal and Financial Aspects of Architectural Conservation (Dundurn Press, Toronto).
8.
GleyeP, 1988, “With heritage so fragile: A critique of the tax credit program for historic building rehabilitation”Journal of the American Planning Association54482–488.
9.
GoodeyB, 1989, “Small-town images: Evocation, function and manipulation”, inThe Behavioural Environment: Essays in Reflection, Application and Re-evaluation Eds BoalF WLivingstoneD N, (Routledge, London) pp 111–132.
10.
GoodeyB, 1993, “Urban design of central areas … and beyond”, inMaking Better Places: Urban Design Now Eds HaywardRMcGlynnS, (Butterworth Architecture, Oxford) pp 53–58.
11.
Government Finance Research Centre, 1996Dollars and Sense of Historic Preservation. The Economic Benefits of Preserving Community CharacterNational Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036–2117.
12.
HartM, 1999Guide to Sustainable Community Indicators (Hart Environmental Data, North Andover, MA).
13.
Heritage Canada, 1998Evaluation of Main Street ProgramHeritage Canada Foundation, 5 Blackburn Avenue, Ottawa, ON KIN 8AZ.
JeschkeH, 1997, “Inventorying the cultural landscape and cultural heritage: A methodological case study”, inLegal and Financial Aspects of Architectural Conservation Eds DenhezMDennisS, (Dundurn Press, Toronto) pp 33–45.
16.
KaplanRNortonD, 1996The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA).
17.
KhakeeA, 1998, “Evaluation and planning: Inseparable concepts”Town Planning Review69359–374.
18.
KosecoffJ, 1982Evaluation Basics: A Practitioner's Manual (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
19.
KushnerJ, 2001, “Planning for downsizing: A comparison of the economic revitalization initiatives in American communities facing military base closure with the German experience of relocating the national capital from Bonn to Berlin”Urban Lawyer33119–146.
20.
BalsasC J Lopes, 2000, “City centre revitalization in Portugal: Lessons from two medium size cities”Cities1719–31.
21.
Lutke-DaldropDWeigelO, 2001, “Revitalization of the city centre: A challenge for town development in Leipze”Berichte zur Deutschen Landeskunde75205–217.
22.
MetzgerJ, 2001, “The failed promise of a festival marketplace: South Street Seaport in Lower Manhattan”Planning Perspectives1625–46.
23.
MeyersW, 1981The Evaluation Enterprise (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).
24.
MillwardHBuntingT, 1999, “A tale of two CBDs II: The internal retail dynamics of Downtown Halifax and Downtown Kitchener”Canadian Journal of Urban Research81–27.
25.
NasarJ, 1998The Evaluative Image of the City (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
26.
National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1988Revitalizing Downtown: A Retrospective Analysis of Main Street Programs 1976–1986 CharacterNational Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036–2117.
27.
NelessenA, 1994Visions for a New American Dream (APA Press, Chicago, IL).
28.
OfferA, (Ed.), 1996In Pursuit of the Quality of Life (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
29.
PageSHardymanR, 1996Place marketing and town centre management: A new tool for urban revitalization” Cities13153–164.
30.
RifkinA, 1995, “Vision on”Planning Week 6 April, page 13.
31.
RobertsonK, 1997, “Downtown retail revitalization: A review of American development strategies”Planning Perspectives12383–401.
32.
RogDFournierD, (Eds), 1997Progress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory Practice and Methods (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).
33.
RossiP, 1997, “Advances in quantitative evaluation”, inProgress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory Practice and Methods Eds RogDFournierD, (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) pp 57–68.
34.
RypkemaDWiehagenK, 2000Dollars and Sense of Historic Preservation. The Economic Benefits of Preserving Philadelphia's PastNational Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036–2117.
35.
SeasonsM, 2002, “Evaluation and municipal urban planning: Practice and prospects”Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation1743–71.
36.
ShipleyR, 2001, “Support for Heritage Townscapes in the UK”Plan Canada September, pp 29–30.
37.
ShipleyR, 2003, “Hodnotenie Townscape Heritage Initiative vo Velkej Britanii” [Evaluation of the Heritage Townscape Initiative in Great Britain]Projek Revue Slovenkej Architektury (Slovak Architectural Journal) January, pp 49–51.
38.
SkeltonB, 1990, “Main street Mid-America: An historical overview”Small Town214.
39.
SmithN, (Ed.), 1992Varieties of Investigative Evaluation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).
40.
StewartF, 1996, “Basic needs, capabilities, and human development”, inIn Pursuit of the Quality of Life Ed. OfferA, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 45–65.
41.
StufflebeamDShinkfieldA, 1985Systematic Evaluation: A Self-instructional Guide to Theory and Practice (Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, MA).
42.
ThomasCBromleyR, 2003, “Retail revitalization and small town centres: The contribution of shopping linkages”Applied Geography2347–71.
43.
WeissC, 1997, “Theory-based evaluation: Past present, and future”, inProgress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory Practice and Methods Eds RogDFournierD, (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) pp 41–56.
44.
WilliamsD, (Ed.), 1986Naturalistic Evaluation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).
