AppaduraiA, 1996Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
2.
BenneworthPRatinhoT, 2014, “Reframing the role of knowledge parks and science cities in knowledge-based urban development”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32784–808
3.
BogartW T, 2006Don't Call it Sprawl: Metropolitan Structure in the 21st Century (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
4.
BunnellT, 2004Malaysia, Modernity and the Multimedia Super Corridor: A Critical Geography of Intelligent Landscapes (Routledge, London)
5.
CastellsMHallP, 1994Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-first-century Industrial Complexes (Routledge, London)
6.
ClarkJ J, 2014, “Siting ‘scientific spaces’ in the US: the push and pull of regional development strategies and national innovation policies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32880–895
7.
ClawsonMHallP, 1973Planning and Urban Growth: An Anglo-American Comparison (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
8.
ForsythA, 2014, “Alternative forms of high-technology district: corridors, clumps, cores, campuses, subdivisions, and sites”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32809–823
9.
ForsythACreweK, 2010, “Suburban technopoles as places: the international campus-garden-suburb style”Urban Design International15165–182
KaiserD, 2004, “The post-war suburbanization of American physics”American Quarterly56851–888
17.
KimHLeeY-SHwangH-R, 2014, “Regionalization of planned S&T parks: the case of Daedeok S&T Park in Daejeon, South Korea”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32843–862
18.
KnowlesS GLeslieS W, 2001, “‘Industrial Versailles’: Eero Saarinen's Corporate Campuses for GM, IBM, and AT&T”Isis921–33
19.
LepawskyJ, 2009, “Clustering as anti-politics machine? Situating the politics of regional economic development and Malaysia's Multimedia Super Corridor”Regional Studies43463–478
20.
LinkA NScottJ T, 2003, “US science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic mission of universities”International Journal of Industrial Organization211323–1356
21.
MasseyDQuintasPWieldD, 1992High-tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, Science and Space (Routledge, London)
22.
MiaoJ THallP, 2014, “Optical illusion? The growth and development of the Optics Valley of China”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32863–879
23.
MozingoL A, 2011Pastoral Capitalism: A History of Suburban Corporate Landscapes (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
24.
O'MaraM P, 2005Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
25.
ParrJ B, 2002, “Missing elements in the analysis of agglomeration economies”International Regional Science Review25151–168
26.
PerryBMayT, 2010, “Urban knowledge exchange: devilish dichotomies and active intermediation”International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development116–24
27.
PhelpsN A, 2004, “Clusters, dispersion and the spaces in between: for an economic geography of the banal”Urban Studies41971–989
28.
PhelpsN A, 2012, “The sub-creative economy of the suburbs in question”International Journal of Cultural Studies15259–271
29.
PhelpsN ADawoodS R S, 2014, “Untangling the spaces of high technology in Malaysia”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32896–915
30.
PhelpsN AWoodA M, 2011, “The new post-suburban politics?”Urban Studies482591–2610
31.
RankinW J, 2010, “The epistemology of the suburbs: knowledge, production and corporate laboratory design”Critical Inquiry36771–806
32.
SaxenianA, 1983, “The urban contradictions of Silicon Valley: regional growth and the restructuring of the semiconductor industry”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research7237–262
33.
TeafordJ C, 1997Post-suburbia: Government and Politics in the Edge Cities (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
34.
The Royal Society, 2010, “New frontiers in science diplomacy: navigating the changing balance of power”, RS Policy document 01/10, Science Policy Centre, London
35.
VallerDPhelpsN ARadfordJ, 2014, “Soft space, hard bargaining: planning for high-tech growth in ‘Science Vale UK’”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32824–842
36.
VallerD CPhelpsN AWoodA M, 2012, “Planning for growth? The implications of localism for ‘Science Vale’, Oxfordshire, UK”Town Planning Review83457–488
37.
WadeR H, 1990Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
38.
WakehamR, 2003, “Dreaming the new Atlantis: science and the planning of Technopolis, 1955–1985”Osiris18255–270
39.
WestheadPStoreyD J, 1994An Assessment of Firms Located On and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom (HMSO, London)