Privatisation and the redistribution of property rights are key features of the transformation of the economic and political space of Central Europe. Within this region there have been important national differences in the experiences of privatisation: in terms of the legacies of the state-socialist period, in the methods of privatisation, and in the outcomes in terms of property rights. We explore three major aspects of privatisation. First, we revisit the path-dependent nature of privatisation, as a process which is influenced above all by national economic and political structures, including relationships in and around the state. Second, we argue that with emphasis on path dependency there is a failure to give sufficient attention to the way in which there was a significant shift in course of transformation in the range of strategics available to the main agents in the privatisation process; in particular, a high degree of control over property rights was achieved in the ‘third wave’ of privatisation by a small number of agents in the context of weak reregulation and corporate governance. Third, we investigate the nature of the third wave of privatisation through the functioning of networks of firms in the Czech and the Slovak Republics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertM, 1993Capitalism Against Capitalism (Whurr Publishers, London)
2.
AshTHarePCanningA, 1994, “Privatisation in the former centrally planned economics”, in Privatisation and Regulation: A Review of the Issues Eds JacksonP MPriceC M (Longman, Harlow, Essex) pp 213–236
3.
BalazV, 1996, “Coupon privatization and investor protection”Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics73–25
4.
Bankové a zúetovacie centrum Slovenska, 1997, “Stredné hodnoty financných ukazovatelov” [Median values of the financial indicators of Slovak business], Banking and Clearing Centre of Slovakia, Zrinskcho 13, Bratislava
5.
BobinskiC, 1997, “EU entry provides spur”Financial Times 26 March
6.
BurawoyMKrotovP, 1993, “The economic basis of Russia's political crisis”New Left Review number 198, 49–69
7.
CampbellJ L, 1993, “Institutional theory and the influence of foreign actors on reform in capitalist and post-socialist societies”, in Institutional Frameworks of Market Economies. Scandinavian and Eastern European Perspectives Eds HausnerJJessopBNielsenK (Avebury Press, Aldershot, Hants) pp 45–67
8.
CEC, 1997aCommission Opinion on Poland's Application for Membership of the European Union COM(97) 2002 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
9.
CEC, 1997bCommission Opinion on the Czech Republic's Application for Membership of the European Union COM(97) 2009 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
10.
CEC, 1997cCommission Opinion on Slovakia's Application for Membership of the European Union COM(97) 2004 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
11.
CEC, 1997dCommission Opinion on Hungary's Application for Membership of the European Union COM(97) 2001 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
12.
CeskaR, 1995, “Privatization in the Czech Republic”, in Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe—1994 Ed. BohmA (Central and Eastern European Privatisation, No.5, Ljubljana) pp 108–120
13.
CoxT, 1994, “Privatization and social interests in Eastern Europe”Journal of European Public Policy1395–412
14.
CsepiLLukacsE, 1995, “Privatization in Hungary”, in Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe—1994 Ed. BohnA (Central and Eastern European Privatisation, No.5, Ljubljana) pp 180–197
15.
Czech National Property Fund, 1996, “Large privatisation in the Czech Republic”Ekonom1931–35
16.
DallagioB, 1995, “Privatization in Europe: a comparison”, in Property Rights and Privatization in the Transition to a Market Economy Ed. DaviddiR (European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht) pp 231–265
17.
DaviddiR, 1995, “Privatization in the transition to a market economy”, in Property Rights and Privatization in the Transition to a Market Economy Ed. DaviddiR (European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht) pp 1–25
18.
DlouhyVMladekJ, 1994, “Privatization and corporate control in the Czech Republic”Economic Policy Supplement, December, 155–170
19.
EarleJ SFrydmanRRapaczynskiA, 1993, “Privatization policies in Eastern Europe: diverse routes to a market economy”, in Privatisation in the Transition to a Market Economy: Studies of Preconditions and Policies in Eastern Europe Eds EarleJ SFrydmanRRapaczynskiA (Frances Pinter, London) pp 1–13
20.
Ekonom Weekly1997, “Zemetek ceské transformace” [Failure of the Czech transition], number 44, pp 78–79
21.
Esping-AndersenG, 1990The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Polity Press, Cambridge)
22.
EstrinS, 1994, “Economic transition and privatization: the issues”, in Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe Ed. EstrinS (Longman, Harlow, Essex) pp 3–30
23.
FogelS DEtcheverryS, 1994, “Reforming the economies of Central and Eastern Europe”, in Managing in Emerging Market Economies, Cases from the Czech and Slovak Republics Ed. FogelS D (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 3–33
24.
GowanP, 1995, “Neo-liberal theory and practice for Eastern Europe”New Left Review number 213, 3–60
25.
GrabherGStarkD, 1998, “Organising diversity: evolutionary theory, network analysis and post-socialism”, in Theorising Transition: The Political Economy of Post-communist Transformations Eds PicklesJSmithA (Routledge, London) pp 54–75
26.
HéthyL, 1997, “Central and Eastern Europe: economic transformation, social cohesion and social dialogue”, in Economic Developments and Reforms in Cooperation Partner Countries: The Social and Human Dimension Ed. WeichhardtR (NATO, Brussels) pp 9–16
27.
HPSHC, 1996, “Sell-offs aimed to open new markets”, Hungarian Privatization and State Holding CompanyThe Observer (A survey of Hungary), 8 September
28.
KlvacovaE, 1996, “Kdo ridi ceské akciove spolecnosti?” [Who is managing the Czech joint-stock companies?]Ekonom Weekly2716–17
29.
KnellM, 1996, “Structural adjustments and growth: is Eastern Europe catching up?”, in Economics of Transition: Structural Adjustments and Growth Prospects in Eastern Europe Ed. KnellM (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants) pp 1–24
30.
LandesmannMSzekelyI P, 1995a, “Introduction”, in Industrial Restructuring and Trade Reorientation in Eastern Europe Eds LandesmannMSzekelyI P (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 1–22
31.
LandesmannMSzekelyI P, 1995b, “Industrial structural change in Central and Eastern European economies”, in Industrial Restructuring and Trade Reorientation in Eastern Europe Eds LandesmannMSzekelyI P (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 23–68
32.
McIntyreJPorterLWendelovaP, 1994, “Ex-émigré entrepreneur Viktor Kozený and the Harvard Group”, in Managing in Emerging Market Economies: Cases from the Czech and Slovak Republics Ed. FogelS D (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 149–165
33.
MejstrikMHlávacekJ, 1993, “Preconditions for privatization in Czechoslovakia in 1990–92”, in Privatisation in the Transition to a Market Economy: Studies of Preconditions and Policies in Eastern Europe Eds EarleJ SFrydmanRRapaczynskiA (Frances Pinter, London) pp 46–74
34.
MertlikP, 1995, “Transformation of the Czech and Slovak economies 1990–92: design, problems, costs”, in Strategic Choice and Path Dependency in Post Socialism: Institutional Dynamics in the Transformation Process Eds HausnerJJessopBNielsenK (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants) pp 218–229
35.
Ministry of Administration and Privatisation of National Property of the Slovak Republic, 1996“Privatisation Process in the Slovak Republic”, Ministry of Administration and Privatisation of National Property of the Slovak Republic, Drienova 24, Bratislava
36.
NielsenKJessopBHausnerJ, 1995, “Institutional change in post-socialism”, in Strategic Choice and Path Dependency in Post Socialism: Institutional Dynamics in the Transformation Process Eds HausnerJJessopBNielsenK (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants) pp 3–44
37.
NutiD M, 1995, “Mass privatization: costs and benefits of instant capitalism”, in Property Rights and Privatization in the Transition to a Market Economy Ed. DaviddiR (European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht) pp 103–132
38.
OECD, 1996, “Recent trends in privatization”Financial Market Trends6413–34
OffeC, 1995, “Designing institutions for East European transitions”, in Strategic Choice and Path Dependency in Post Socialism Eds HausnerJJessopBNielsenK (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants) pp 125–144
41.
PaterK, 1995, “Privatization in Poland”, in Privatisation in Central and Eastern Europe—1994 Ed. BohmA (Central and Eastern European Privatisation, No.5, Ljubljana) pp 301–321
42.
PohlGAndersonRClaessensSDjankovS, 1997, “Privatisation and restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe”, TP386, World Bank, Washington, DC
PorvaznikJ, 1994, “Privatisation in the Slovak Republic”, in Privatisation in Central and Eastern Europe—1993 Ed. BohmA (Central and Eastern European Privatisation, No.4, Ljubljana) pp 254–264
45.
RhodesM, 1996, “Globalisation and West European welfare states”, WP96/43, European University Institute, Florence
46.
RondinelliD AYurkiewiczJ, 1996, “Privatization and economic restructuring in Poland: an assessment of transition policies”American Journal of Economics and Sociology55145–160
47.
RowthornBChangH-J, 1993, “Public ownership and the theory of the state”;The Political Economy of Privatisation Eds ClarkeTPitelisC (Routledge, London) pp 54–69
48.
SachsJ, 1990, “What is to be done?”The Economist 13 January
49.
SachsJ, 1994Understanding Shock TherapySocial Market Foundation, II Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QB
50.
SmithA, 1997, “The new geo-economics of central and eastern Europe”, in Geographies of Economies Eds LeeRWillsJ (Arnold, London) pp 333–344
51.
SmithAPicklesJ, 1998, “Introduction: theorising transition and the political economy of transformation”, in Theorising Transition: The Political Economy of Post-communist Transformations Eds PicklesJSmithA (Routledge, London) pp 1–24
52.
SNPF, 1996, “Slovak National Property Fund, 1995 annual report”TREND6(51) 22
53.
StaniszkisJ, 1991, “‘Political capitalism’ in Poland”East European Politics and Societies5127–141
54.
StarkD, 1992, “Path dependence and privatisation strategies in East-Central Europe”East European Politics and Societies6(1) 17–54
55.
StarkD, 1994, “Path dependence and privatisation strategies in East-Central Europe”, in Changing Political Economies — Privatization in Post-communist and Reforming Communist States Ed. MilovE (Lynne Rienner, New York) pp 115–146
56.
StarkD, 1996, “Recombinant property in East European capitalism”American Journal of Sociology101993–1027
57.
StorperM, 1995, “The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies”European Urban and Regional Studies2(3) 191–221
58.
The Economist1996, “At war in Warsaw”, 18 May, page 100
59.
VaskovicM, 1995, “Tretia vlna privatizacie v Cesku?” [Third wave privatisation in the Czech Republic?]Hospodarske Noving Bratislava, 19 December, Volume 3, Supplement Kapitálový trh, page viii
60.
VoszkaE, 1993, “Spontaneous privatization in Hungary”, in Privatisation in the Transition to a Market Economy: Studies of Preconditions and Policies in Eastern Europe Eds EarleJ SFrydmanRRapaczynskiA (Frances Pinter, London) pp 89–120
61.
WilksS, 1997, “EU competition policy and the CEECs: the institutions of a new market economy”, unpublished paper, Department of Politics, University of ExeterExeter
62.
WilliamsA MBalazVZajacS, 1998, “The EU and Central Europe: the remaking of economic relationships”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie89 (2) 131–149
