In this paper we provide a critical examination of the concept of policy diffusion. In doing so, we critique the core belief that underpins it, namely, the notion that housing problems are the product of universal structural conditions that are common to all societies. In turn, we also critique the logical derivative, namely, the notion that housing policies which have been ‘successful’ in their country of origin can be transferred to (that is, exported to or imported by) other societies. To do this, we commence by developing a conceptual framework that is based on the idea of societal ‘divergence’ rather than universalism. This provides a comparative method which we then apply in order to examine the second-home ownership problematic in Britain and Sweden. In doing so, they demonstrate that the problems caused by postwar growth in second-home ownership (and the associated housing policy responses that have been formulated) are particular to each country. To conclude, we make some general observations about the limits of policy diffusion by highlighting the conditions in which imported or exported housing policies are likely to succeed or fail.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldskogiusH, 1967, “Vacation house settlement in the Siljan region”Geografiska Annaler49 (2) 69–95
2.
AllenC, 1992, “The death of the British economy? An institutional approach to the British economic crisis”, masters dissertation, Liverpool Institute of Public Administration and Management, Liverpool
3.
AllenC, 1999a, “Disablism in housing and comparative community care discourse—towards an interventionist model of disability and interventionist welfare regime theory”Housing, Theory and Society1(1) forthcoming
4.
AllenC, 1999b, “Towards a comparative sociology of residence and disablement—Britain and Sweden in interventionist welfare regime perspective”Housing, Theory and Society1 (2) forthcoming
5.
BalchinP, 1989Housing Policy: An Introduction (Routledge, London)
6.
BalchinP, 1996Housing Policy in Europe (Routledge, London)
7.
BallMHarloeMMartensM, 1988Housing and Social Change in Europe and the USA (Routledge, London)
8.
BarlowJChambersD, 1992, “Planning agreements and affordable housing provision”, Centre for Urban and Regional Research, University of Sussex, Brighton
9.
BarlowJDuncanS, 1994Success and Failure in Housing Provision: European Systems Compared (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
10.
BarlowJCocksRParkerM, 1994Planning for Affordable Housing (The Stationery Office, London)
11.
BellD, 1960The End of Ideology (The Free Press, Chicago, IL)
12.
BielckusC L, 1977, “Second homes in Scandinavia”, in Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? Ed. CoppockJ T (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 35–47
13.
BielckusC LRogersA WWibberleyG P, 1972, “Second homes in England and Wales: a study of the distribution and use of rural properties taken over as second residences”, School of Rural Economics and Related Studies, Wye College, Wye, Ashford, Kent
14.
BishopKHooperA, 1991, “Planning for social housing”, Association of District Councils, 26 Chapter Street, London SW1P 4ND
15.
BollomC, 1978Attitudes and Second Homes in Rural Wales (University of Wales Press, Cardiff)
16.
CoppockJ T (Ed.), 1977Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
17.
DART, 1977, “Second homes in Scotland: a report to Countryside Commission for Scotland, Scottish Tourist Board, Highlands and Island Development Board, Scottish Development Department”, publication 22, Dartington Amenity Research Trust, Totnes, Devon
18.
DolingJ, 1997Comparative Housing Policy: Government and Housing in Advanced Industrialised Countries (Macmillan, London)
19.
DolowitzDMarshD, undated, “Who learns what from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature”, Department of Government, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
20.
DonnisonD, 1967The Government of Housing (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
21.
DowerM, 1977, “Planning aspects of second homes”, in Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? Ed. CoppockJ T (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 155–164
22.
DowningPDowerM, 1973Second Homes in England and Wales Countryside Commission (The Stationery Office, London)
23.
European Commission, 1994European Social Policy: A Way Forward for the Union COM(94)333 (Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
24.
European Commission, undated, “Communique on regional policy”; copy available from C Allen, European Studies Research Institute, Department of Housing, University of Salford, Salford
25.
European Union, 1996Social Portrait of Europe (Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
26.
EydenJ, 1965, “The growth and development of the social services and the welfare state”, in An Introduction to the Study of Social Administration Ed. MarshD (Routledge, London) pp 18–42
27.
FallisG, 1994, “Lessons from Canadian social housing policy”, Centre for Housing Policy, Heslington, York YO1 5DD
28.
FiskM J, 1996Home Truths: Issues for Housing in Wales (Gwasg Gomer, Llandysul)
29.
FreemanRTesterS, 1996, “Social policy diffusion”, paper presented to the Social Policy Association conference, Social Policy in Europe: Convergence or Divergence, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, 16–18 July; copy available from The Social Policy Association, 16 Creighton Avenue, London N10 1NU
30.
FukuyamaF, 1992The End of History and the Last Man (The Free Press, New York)
31.
GallentN, 1997a, “Improvement grants, second homes and planning control in England and Wales: a policy review”Planning Practice and Research12401–410
32.
GallentN, 1997b, “Planning for affordable rural housing in England and Wales”Housing Studies12(1) 145–155
33.
GallentNTewdwr-JonesMHiggsG, 1996, “Rural housing change: second homes in Britain and Europe”, unpublished paper, Department of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff; copy available from authors
34.
GeorgeS, 1976How the Other Half Die (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
35.
GeorgeS, 1988A Fate Worse Than Debt (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
36.
GoldthorpeJ H, 1964, “Social stratification in industrial society”, in Sociological Review Monograph 8: The Development of Industrial Societies Ed. HalmosP (University of Keele, Keele)
37.
HarloeM, 1985Private Rented Housing in the United States and Europe (Croom Helm, London)
38.
HarloeM.1995The People's Home: Social Rented Housing in Europe and America (Blackwell, Oxford)
39.
HenningC, 1996, “Local welfare strategies for the elderly”, paper presented to the European Network of Housing Research (ENHR) Conference Mousing and European Integration, Helsingor, Denmark, 26–31 August; copy available from ENHR, c/o Institute for Housing Research, PO Box 785, S-801 29, Gävle
40.
HigginsJ, 1981States of Welfare: Comparative Analysis in Social Policy (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
41.
JacobsC A J, 1972, “Second homes in Denbighshire”, report 3, County of Denbigh Tourism and Recreation; Denbighshire County Council, County of Denbigh Tourism and Recreation; Denbighshire County Council
42.
KalbroTMattssonH, 1995Urban Land and Property Markets in Sweden (UCL Press, London)
43.
KemenyJ, 1981The Myth of Home Ownership: Private versus Public Choice in Housing Tenure (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
44.
KemenyJ, 1992aHousing and Social Theory (Routledge, London)
45.
KemenyJ, 1992b, “Housing and social structure: towards a sociology of residence”, WP102, School of Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol
46.
KemenyJ, 1993, “The significance of Swedish rental policy: Cost-renting: command economy versus the social market in comparative perspective”Housing Studies8(1) 3–15
47.
KemenyJ, 1995From Public Housing to the Social Market: Rental Systems in Comparative Perspective (Routledge, London)
48.
KemenyJLoweS, 1998, “Schools of comparative housing research—from convergence to divergence”Housing Studies13161–176
49.
KerrC, 1962Industrialism and Industrial Man (Heinemann, London)
50.
LarssonG, 1969, “Undcrsökningar rörande fritidsbebyggelse” [Survey of second homes], bulletin 6, part 4, Institutionen for fastighetsteknik, sekt. Lantmäteri, Tekniska högskolan, Stockholm
51.
LipsetS M, 1963Political Man (Anchor Books, New York)
52.
LoughlinM, 1984, “Local needs policies and development control strategies. An examination of the role of occupancy restrictions in development control”, WP-42, School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol
MishraR, 1981Society and Social Policy2nd edition (Macmillan, London)
56.
NewbyH, 1980Green and Pleasant Land? (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
57.
O'ConnorJ, 1973The Fiscal Crisis of the State (St Martins Press, New York)
58.
PollardS, 1982The Wasting of the British Economy: British Economic Policy 1945 to the Present (Croom Helm, London)
59.
PowerA, 1993Hovels to High Rise: Social Housing in Europe Since 1850 (Routledge, London)
60.
PyneC B, 1973, “Second homes”, Caernarvonshire County Planning Department; Gwynedd County Council, County Offices, Caernarfon, Gwynedd LL55 1SH
61.
Reader's Digest1970Survey of Europe Today (Reader's Digest, Pleasantville, NY)
62.
RogersA W, 1977, “Second homes in England and Wales: a spatial view”, in Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? Ed. CoppockJ T (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 85–102
63.
RoseR, 1991, “What is lesson drawing?”Journal of Public Policy11(1) 3–30
64.
SalletmaierC, 1993, “The development and superimposition of tourism—second homes and recreation within the rural fringe of an urban centre”Mitteilungen der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft135215–242
65.
SCB, 1993Markanvändningen i Sverige [Land use in Sweden]2nd edition (Statistiska Centralbyrån, Stockholm)
66.
ShucksmithM, 1981No Homes for Locals? (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
67.
ShucksmithM, 1983, “Second homes: a framework for policy”Town Planning Review54174–193
68.
ShucksmithM, 1990Housebuilding in Britain's Countryside (Routledge, New York)
69.
SoleyC, 1990, “Seconds out”Roof15(2) 38–39
70.
SOU, 1964Friluftsliver i Sverige, Part I: Utgångsläde och utvecklingtstendenser [Outdoor recreation in Sweden, part 1: starting point and development] (Statens Offentliga Utredningar, Stockholm)
71.
Town and Country Planning Act, 1971Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 78 (The Stationery Office, London)
72.
Town and Country Planning Act, 1990Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 8 (The Stationery Office, London)
73.
TurnerB, 1996, “Sweden”, in Housing Policy in Europe Ed. BalchinP (Routledge, London) pp 99–112
74.
VaradayD, 1994, “Local housing plans: learning from Great Britain”, paper presented to the conference Shaping the Urban Future, University of Bristol, Bristol, 11–13 July; copy available from School for Policy Studies, Rodney Lodge, University of Bristol, Bristol
75.
WedderburnD, 1965The Facts and Theories of the Welfare State: 1965 Socialist Register (Merlin Press, London)
76.
WilenskyH, 1975, “Leftism, Catholicism, and democratic corporatism: the role of political parties in recent welfare state development”, in The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America Eds FloraPHeidenheimerA J (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 345–382
77.
WilliamsH, 1974, “Second homes”, unpublished diploma thesis, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Wales, Cardiff
78.
WolmanH, 1992, “Understanding cross-national policy transfers: the case of Britain and the US”Governance5(1) 27–45
79.
ZaldM, 1965Social Welfare Institutions (John Wiley, New York)
