Access to external sources of technical knowledge is one of the keys to staying innovative for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The literature suggests that SMEs with a weak internal R&D capacity do not make much use of institutional sources like research institutes and universities. In this paper I investigate how trade associations can induce member SMEs to use a research institute. The case of a public research institute and SMEs in the textile industry in Kyoto, Japan is examined. Evidence from the case suggests that trade associations facilitate the use of the institute by expressing a collective ‘voice’ to the management of the institute. The effect is evident among active members in the use of services involving a large information gap as to their benefits. I also consider a shortcoming of the collective approach and suggest some measures to be taken on the part of research institutes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenTJHymanDBPinckneyDL, 1983, “Transferring technology to the small manufacturing firm: A study of technology transfer in three countries”Research Policy12199211
2.
AntonelliCMarchionattiR, 1998, “Technological and organisational change in a process of industrial rejuvenation: The case of the Italian cotton textile industry”Cambridge Journal of Economics22(1) 118
3.
BennettRJ, 1998, “Business associations and their potential to contribute to economic development: Reexploring an interface between the state and market”Environment and Planning A3013671387
4.
BennettRJ, 1999, “Business associations: Their potential contribution to government policy and the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy17593608
5.
BennettRJRobsonPJ, 1999a, “Intensity of interaction in supply of business advice and client impact: A comparison of consultancy, business associations and government support initiatives for SMEs”British Journal of Management10351369
6.
BennettRJRobsonPJ, 1999b, “The use of external business advice by SMEs in Britain”Entrepreneur ship and Regional Development11155180
7.
BennettRJBrattonWARobsonPJ, 2000, “Business advice: The influence of distance”Regional Studies34813828
8.
CharlesDHowellsJ, 1992Technology Transfer in Europe: Public and Private Networks (Belhaven Press, London)
9.
ClarkT, 1995Managing Consultants: Consultancy as the Management of Impressions (Open University Press, Buckingham)
10.
Commission of the European Communities, 1994Research and Technology Management in Enterprises: Issues for Community Policy (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels)
11.
CurranJBlackburnR, 1994Small Firms and Local Economic Networks: The Death of the Local Economy? (Paul Chapman, London)
12.
FuellhartK, 1999, “Localization and the use of information sources: The case of the carpet industry”European Urban and Regional Studies63958
13.
GeislerERubensteinAH, 1989, “University—industry relations: A review of major issues”, in Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry—University—Government Relationship Eds LinkANTasseyG (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA) pp 4362
14.
GittellRJKaufmanA, 1996, “State government efforts in industrial modernization: Using theory to guide practice”Regional Studies30477492
15.
GlasmeierAK, 1999, “Territory-based regional development policy and planning in a learning economy: The case of ‘real service centres’ in industrial districts”European Urban and Regional Studies67384
16.
GlasmeierAKFuellhartKFellerIMarkMM, 1998, “The relevance of firm-learning theories to the design and evaluation of manufacturing modernization programs”Economic Development Quarterly12107124
17.
HassinkR, 1996, “Technology transfer agencies and regional economic development”European Planning Studies4167184
18.
HassinkR, 1997, “Technology transfer infrastructures: Some lessons from experiences in Europe, the US and Japan”European Planning Studies5351370
19.
HirschmanAO, 1970Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
20.
HitchensDMWNO'FarrellPNConwayCD, 1994, “Business service use by manufacturing firms in Mid Wales”Environment and Planning A2695106
21.
HolmstromB, 1985, “The provision of services in a market economy”, in Managing the Service Economy: Prospects and Problems Ed. InmanRP (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 183213
22.
JolyPBMangematinV, 1996, “Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R&D: The dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation”Research Policy25901922
23.
KajiwaraT, 1998, “Dento to gijutsu kakushin no setten: Saikin no kenkyu jirei kara” [Intersection of tradition and technological innovation: From recent cases of research] Kyoto Shoko Joho [Kyoto commerce and industry news] 158 23–31
24.
KeebleDBrysonJWoodP, 1991, “Small firms, business services growth and regional development in the United Kingdom: Some empirical findings”Regional Studies25439457
25.
LuriaDWiardaE, 1996, “Performance benchmarking and measuring program impacts on customers: Lessons from the Midwest Manufacturing Technology Center”Research Policy25233246
26.
MackunPMacPhersonAD, 1997, “Externally-assisted product innovation in the manufacturing sector: The role of location, in-house R&D and outside technical support”Regional Studies31659668
27.
Management and Coordination Agency, Government of Japan, 20001998 Annual Report on the Family Income and Expenditure Survey (Management and Coordination Agency, Tokyo)
28.
MasonGWagnerK, 1999, “Knowledge transfer and innovation in Germany and Britain: ‘intermediate institution’ models of knowledge transfer under strain?”Industry and Innovation685109
29.
MooreDSMcCabeGP, 1993Introduction to the Practice of Statistics2nd edition (W H Freeman, New York)
30.
MorganK, 1996, “Learning-by-interacting: Inter-firm networks and enterprise support”, in Networks of Enterprises and Local Development: Competing and Co-operating in Local Productive Systems (OECD, Paris) pp 5366
31.
OECD, 1993Small and Medium-sized Enteprises: Technology and Competitiveness (OECD, Paris)
32.
O'FarrellPNHitchensDMWN, 1990a, “Producer services and regional development: Key conceptual issues of taxonomy and quality measurement”Regional Studies24163171
33.
O'FarrellPNHitchensDMWN, 1990b, “Research policy and review 32. Producer services and regional development: A review of some major conceptual policy and research issues”Environment and Planning A2211411154
34.
OlsonM, 1965The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
35.
PykeF, 1994Small Firms, Technical Services and Inter-firm Cooperation (International Labour Organization, Geneva)
36.
RothwellR, 1983, “Innovation and firm size: A case for dynamic complementarity; or, is small really so beautiful?”Journal of General Management8(3) 525
37.
RothwellRDodgsonM, 1991, “External linkages and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises”R&D Management21125137
38.
RushHHobdayMBessantJArnoldEMurrayR, 1996Technology Institutes: Strategies for Best Practice (International Thomson Business Press, London)
39.
ShapiraPRoessnerJDBarkeR, 1995, “New public infrastructure for small firm industrial modernization in the USA”Entrepreneur ship and Regional Development76384
40.
TaylorMSingletonS, 1993, “The communal resource: Transaction costs and the solution of collective action problems”Politics and Society21195214
41.
WilliamsonPE, 1975Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, New York)
42.
ZeithamlVA, 1981, “How consumer evaluation processes differ between goods and services”, in Marketing of Services Eds DonnelleyJHGeorgeWR (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL) pp 186190
