The last few years have seen a major debate on the scale, extent, and causes of social polarisation in global cities and in Western societies in general. But the debate has often been characterised more by theoretical assertion than by empirical analysis. In particular, the concept of social polarisation has often been confused with inequality. The authors use General Household Survey data and New Earnings Survey data from 1979 to 1995 to examine the existence and extent of polarisation in London. It is argued that the evidence for polarisation is relatively weak, and that to the extent that polarisation exists it is asymmetric, with much greater growth in the size of groups at the top of the earnings distribution than at the bottom. But it is also argued that both London and Great Britain as a whole have seen a marked increase in earnings inequality over the last twenty-five years. Although most groups have improved earnings in real terms, the increase has been much greater at the top end of the earnings scale. As a result, the interquartile and interdecile earnings ratios have risen sharply. It is concluded that London has seen an increase in earnings inequality rather than growth of social polarisation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngeloL, 1995, “Marching to its own drummer; why wage trends in New York City have diverged from the nation”Urban Affairs Review31104–119
2.
BruegelI, 1996, “Gendering the polarization debate: A Comment on Mamnett's ‘Social Polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes’”Urban Studies331431–1439
3.
BruegelILyonsM, 1995, “The insecure profcssionalisntion of London”, Paper presented to the Greater London Group annual seminar at Reading University, 16–18 December; copy available from Dr Lyons, School of Urban Development and Policies, South Bank University, London
4.
BurgersJ, 1996, “No polarisation in Dutch cities? Inequality in a corporatist country”Urban Studies3399–105
5.
ClarkW A V, 1998, “Mass migration and local outcomes: Is international migration to the United States creating a new urban underclass?”Urban Studies35371–384
6.
ClarkW A VMcNicholasM, 1996, “Re-examining economic and social polarisation in a multiethnic metropolitan area: The case of Los Angeles”Area2856–63
7.
ColeB, 1975, “Polarity and polarisation”, in GLC Research Memorandum 443 Ed. DugmoreK (Greater London Council, London) pp 68–80; copy available from the author
8.
DaleABamfordA, 1989, “Social polarisation in Britain 1973–82—evidence from the General Household Survey: A Comment on Paht's hypothesis”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research13481–500
9.
Esping-AndersonG (Ed.)., 1993Changing Classes: Stratification and Mobility in Post-industrial Societies (Sage, London)
10.
EstebanJ MRayD, 1994, “On the measurement of polarization”Econometrica62819–851
11.
EversleyD, 1972, “Rising costs and static incomes: Some economic consequences of regional planning in London”Urban Studies9347–368
12.
FrankR HCookP J, 1996The Winner Takes All Society (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
13.
FriedmannJWolffG, 1982, “World city formation: An agenda for research and action”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research6309–343
14.
GlassR, 1973, “The mood of London”, in London: Urban Patterns, Problems and Policies Eds DonnisonDEversleyD (Heinemann, London) pp 405–432
15.
GordonIHarloeM, 1991, “A dual to New York? London in the 1980s”, in Dual City: Restructuring New York Eds MollenkopfJCastellsM (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pp 377–395
16.
GreenA E, 1998, “The geography of earnings and incomes in the 1990s: An overview”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy16633–647
17.
GreenD, 1995From Artisans to Paupers: Economic Change and Poverty in London, 1790–1870 (Scolar Press, Aldershot, Hants)
18.
HamnettC, 1976, “Social change and social segregation in Inner London, 1961–71”Urban Studies13261–271
19.
HamnettC, 1994a, “Social polarisation in global cities: Theory and evidence”Urban Studies31401–424
20.
HamnettC, 1994b, “Socio-economic change in London: Professionalisation not polarisation”Built Environment20192–203
21.
HamnettC, 1996, “Social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes”Urban Studies331407–1431
22.
HarrisM, 1973, “Aspects of social polarisation”, in London: Urban Patterns, Problems and Policies Eds DonnisonDEversleyD (Heinemann, London) pp 159–189
23.
HarrisMLyonsJ, 1971, “Social polarisation”, RM324, GLC Intelligence Unit, Greater London Council, London; copy available from the author
24.
HarrisonBBluestoneB, 1988The Great U-turn: Corporate Restructuring and the Polarizing of America (Basic Books, New York)
25.
KloostermanR, 1996, “Double Dutch: Polarisation trends in Amsterdam and Rotterdam after 1980”Regional Studies30467–476
26.
KutterP B, 1983, “The declining middle”Atlantic Monthly July, 60–72
27.
LawrenceR Z, 1984, “Sectoral shifts and the size of the middle class”The Brookings Review Fall, 3–11
28.
LevyP, 1987, “The middle class: Is it really vanishing?”The Brookings Review Summer, 77–122
29.
MollenkopfJ HCastellsM, 1991Dual City: Restructuring New York (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
30.
OPCS, 1979- General Household Survey annual, Office for Population Censuses and Surveys (The Stationery Office, London)
31.
OPCS, 1979–95New Earnings Survey6 issues a year, Office for Population Censuses and Surveys (The Stationery Office, London)
32.
PahlR, 1971, “Poverty and the urban system”, in Spatial Policy Problems of the British Economy Eds ChisholmMMannersG (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
33.
PahlR, 1988, “Some remarks on informal work, social polarisation and the social structure”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12247–267
34.
PinchS, 1993, “Social polarization: A Comparison of evidence from Britain and the United States”Environment and Planning A25779–795
35.
PreteceilleE, 1995, “Division sociale de l'espace et globalisation: Le cas de la métropole parisienne”Societies Contemporaines22(3) 33–67
36.
SassenS, 1984, “The new labour demand in global cities”, in Urban Affairs Annual 126. Cities in Transformation Ed. SmithM P (Sage, Beverley Hills, CA) pp 139–171
37.
SassenS, 1985, “Capital mobility and labor migration: Their expression in core cities”, in Urbanization in the World Economy Ed. TimberlakeM (Academic Press, New York) pp 231–265
38.
SassenS, 1991The Global City: New York, London and Tokyo (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
39.
SimonN W H, 1977, “The relative level and changes in earnings in London and Great Britain”Regional Studies287–98
40.
ThriftNLeyshonA, 1992, “In the wake of money: The City of London and the accumulation of value”, in Global Finance and Urban Living Eds BuddLWhimsterS (Routledge, London) pp 282–311
