The author examines linkage patterns in Oxfordshire between a sample of high-technology firms and local universities and national laboratories with a view to identifying local impediments to technology transfer. Two kinds of impediment are identified: those which are ‘obstructions’, arising from the failure of mechanisms designed to create networks within the national and local innovation systems, and ‘barriers’, which are the weak links within the innovation process in general.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminAThriftN, 1995, “Globalisation, institutional ‘thickness’ and the local economy”, in Managing Cities: The New Urban Context Eds HealeyPCamersonSDavoudiSGrahamSMadanipourA (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 91–108.
2.
ArchibugiDMichieJ, 1995, “The globalisation of technology: A new taxonomy”Cambridge Journal of Economics19121–140.
3.
BonaccorsiAPiccalugaA, 1994, “A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university – industry relationships”R&D Management24229–247.
4.
BrehenyMMcQuaidR (Eds), 1987The Development of High Technology Industries (Croom Helm, Andover, Hants).
5.
ButchartR L, 1987, “A new UK definition of the high technology industries”Economic Trends number 400 (February) 82–93.
6.
CharlesDHowellsJ, 1992Technology Transfer in Europe (Belhaven Press, London).
7.
CO/OPSS/OST, 1993, “Realising our potential: A strategy for science, engineering and technology”, Cm.2250, Cabinet Office/Office of Public Service and Science/Office of Science and Technology (The Stationery Office, London).
8.
DavidPForayD, 1994, “Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base”, Working Group on Innovation and Technology Policy (OECD, Paris).
9.
DavidPMoweryD CSteinmeullerW E, 1994, “University–industry research Collaborations: Managing missions in conflict”, paper presented at the CEPR/AAAS conference on University Goals, Institutional Mechanisms, and the ‘Industrial Transferability’ of Research, Stanford, CA, 18–20 March; copy available from P David, All Souls College, Oxford OX1 4AL.
10.
DebackereKRappaM A, 1994, “Technological communities and the diffusion of knowledge: A Replication and validation”R&D Management24355–371.
11.
EdquistC, 1997, “Preface”Systems of Innovation (Frances Pinter, London).
12.
EtkowitzH, 1989, “Entrepreneurial science in the academy: A Case of transformation of norms”Social Problems36 (1) 14–27.
13.
EtzkowitzHStevensA J, 1995, “Inching towards industrial policy: The universities' role in government initiatives to assist small, innovative companies in the US”Science Studies8 (2) 13–31.
14.
FoleyPWattsD, 1996, “Production site R&D in a mature region”Tijdschift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie87136–145.
15.
GarnseyGLawton SmithH, 1997, “The science based industrial complex: diverse paths; common processes” WP-12/97, Research Papers in Management Studies, Judge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
16.
GertlerM, 1992, “Flexibility revisited: Districts, nation states, and forces of organisation of production”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series17259–278.
17.
HenryN, 1992, “New industrial spaces: Locational logic of a new production era?”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research3375–396.
18.
HenryNPinchSRussellS, 1996, “In pole position? Untraded interdependencias, new industrial spaces and the British motor sport industry”Area28 (1) 25–36.
19.
HilpertU, 1991Regional Innovation and Decentralisation (Routledge, London).
20.
JordanS, 1995, “Industrial change, labour mobility and regional economic development: the case of high technology industry in Oxfordshire”, dissertation, Honours School of Geography, University of Oxford, Oxford.
21.
KeebleDLawsonC.Lawton SmithHMooreBWilkinsonF, 1996, “Internationalisation processes and networking in technology-intensive small firms”, paper presented at 19th ISBA National Conference, Birmingham; copy available from D Keeble, ESRC Centre for Business Research, Department of Applied Economics, Sidgwich Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DE.
22.
KeebleDLawsonCLawton SmithHMooreBWilkinsonF, 1997, “Internationalisation processes, networking and local embeddedness in technology-intensive small firms”Small Firms: Enterprising Futures Eds RamMDeakinsDSmallboneD (Paul Chapman, London) pp 60–72.
23.
Lawton SmithH, 1990The Location and Development of Advanced Technology Industry in Oxfordshire in the Context of the Research Environmentunpublished DPhil thesis, School of Geography, University of Oxford, Oxford.
24.
Lawton SmithH, 1991, “Industry–academic links: The case of Oxford University”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy9403–416.
25.
Lawton SmithH, 1995, “The contribution of national laboratories to the European scientific labour market”Industry and Higher Education (June) 17–185.
26.
LipietzA, 1993, “The local and the global: Regional individuality or inter-regionalism”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series188–18.
27.
LundvallB-A, 1988, “Innovation as an interactive process—from user–producer interaction to national system of innovation”, in Technical Change and Economic Theory Eds DosiGFreemanCNelsonRSilverbergGSoeteL (Frances Pinter, London) pp 349–369.
28.
LundvallB-A (Ed.)., 1992National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (Frances Pinter, London).
29.
MacdonaldS, 1997, “Formal collaboration and informal information networks”, a note to the SPSG meeting, 24–25 February, London; copy available from MacdonaldS, Management School, Sheffield University, Sheffield.
30.
MaleckiETodtlingF, 1995, “The new flexible economy: Shaping regional and local institutions for global competition”Technological Change, Economic Development and Space Eds BertugliaC SFischerM MPretoG (Springer, Berlin) pp 277–294.
31.
MalmbergA, 1996, “Industrial geography: Agglomeration and local milieu”Progress in Human Geography20392–403.
32.
MaskellPMalmbergA, 1995, “Localised learning and industrial competitiveness”, paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference on Regional Futures, Gothenburg, 6–9 May; copy available from P Maskell, Copenhagen Business School, TTR, Blagardsgade 23, B DK-2200 Copenhagen.
33.
MihellD, 1996, “Biotechnology sector in Oxfordshire”, September; copy available from Oxford Innovation Ltd, Oxford Centre for Innovation, Mill Street, Oxford OX2 0JX.
34.
MorganK, 1996, “Learning-by-interacting: inter-firm networks and enterprise support”, mimeograph, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Wales, Cardiff.
35.
NelsonR (Ed.)., 1993National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
36.
NelsonRRosenbergN, 1993, “Technical innovation and national systems”, in National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis Ed.NelsonR (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 3–27.
37.
OCC, 1997/98, “Economic development strategy for Oxfordshire”, Oxfordshire County Council, County Hall, New Road, Oxford OX1 1ND.
Segal Quince Wicksteed, 1988Universities, Enterprise and Local Economic Development: An Exploration of Links (The Stationery Office, London).
46.
StorperM, 1995, “The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies”European Urban and Regional Studies2191–221.
47.
SunleyP, 1992, “Marshallian industrial districts: The case of the Lancashire cotton industry in the inter-war years”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series17306–320.
48.
University of Oxford, 1995a, “Medical science at Oxford: meeting the challenge of disease”, External Relations Office, University of Oxford, Oxford.
49.
University of Oxford, 1995b, “Report of the Technology Transfer Arrangements Review Committee”, RE/10/4/2/1 WP928.055, University of Oxford, Oxford.
50.
WardKJonesM, 1996, “Business elites and urban politics”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Charlotte, NC, April; copy available from K Ward, School of Geography, University of Manchester, Manchester.
51.
WillisTKinghamDStaffordJ, 1996, “Oxfordshire's motor sport industry: Building on local strengths”, a report commissioned by the Heart of England Training and Enterprise Council; copy available from Oxford Innovation, Oxford Centre for Innovation, Mill Street, Oxford OX2 OJX.
