In this paper the authors discuss the characteristics of NIMBY (‘not in my backyard’) facilities as they relate to the impacts on the local neighbourhood. They evaluate the available conflict-resolution instalments used for the siting of NIMBY facilities, and in particular aim to suggest two alternative auction mechanisms for localities affected by these facilities, Some considerations for general compensation schemes arc also presented. Here, efficiency and some cost – benefit rules for compensation are suggested. Finally, some equity concerns are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArrowK JFisherA C, 1974, “Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility”Quarterly Journal of Economics88312–319
2.
BishopR, 1982, “Option value: An exposition and extension”Land Economics581–15
3.
FisherAHanemannW M, 1987, “Quasi-option value: Some misconceptions dispelled”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management14183–190
4.
GregoryRKunreutherHEasterlingDRichardsK, 1991, “Incentives policies to site hazardous facilities”Risk Analysis11667–675
5.
KleindorferPKunreutherHHongD, 1996Energy, Environment and the Economy (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants)
6.
KnetschJ LBorcherdingT E, 1979, “Expropriation of private property and the basis for compensation”University of Toronto Law Journal29237–247
7.
KrutillaJ VFisherA C, 1985The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resourcesrevised editionResources for the Future, Washington, DC)
8.
KunreutherH, 1988, “Nevada's predicament: Public perception of risk from the proposed nuclear waste repository”Environment3017–33
KunreutherHEasterlingDDesvousgesWSlovicP, 1990, “Public attitudes toward siting a high level nuclear waste repository in Nevada”Risk Analysis10469–484
11.
McAfeeR PMcMillanJ, 1987, “Auctions and bidding”Journal of Economic Literature25699–738
12.
Ministry of the Environment, 1990Annual Report 1991 (Singapore National Printers, Singapore)
13.
MishanE J, 1977, “Property rights and amenity rights”, in Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings Eds DorfmanRDorfmanN S (W W Norton, New York) pp 245–251
O'HareMBacowLSandersonD, 1983Facility Siting and Public Opposition (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York)
16.
PopperF, 1983, “The political uses of risk analysis in land use planning”Risk Analysis3255–263
17.
QuahE, 1994, “Cost–benefit analysis and the problem of locating environmentally noxious facilities”Journal of International Development679–92
18.
RandallA, 1987An Economic Approach to Natural Resource and Environmental Policy2nd editionJohn Wiley, New York)
19.
SkaburskisA, 1988, “Criteria for compensation for the imports of large projects: The impact of British Columbia's Revelstoke Dam on local government services”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management7668–686
20.
WiltshireS, 1987, “The role of the public in siting waste disposal facilities: Radioactive waste management in the USA”, in Hazardous Materials Disposal: Siting and Management Ed. ChatterjiM (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants) pp 17–29
