In this paper the way in which the Training and Enterprise Councils (TECs) and Local Enterprise Companies (LECs) have been responding to the small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) sector is considered. By reference to a questionnaire survey of TECs and LECs the organisational mechanisms and policy initiatives which have been developed to reach SMEs are evaluated. The analysis is concentrated on the differential performance of TECs and LECs and whether size and employment composition factors, or the complexity of the area the TEC or LEC operates in, affects its ability to encourage small-business involvement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottB, 1994, “Training strategies in small service sector firms: Employer and employee perspectives”Human Resource Management Journal4(2) 70–87
2.
AinleyPVickerstaffS A, 1994, “Transitions from corporatism: The privatisation of policy failure”Contemporary Record7541–556
3.
BennettR, 1994, “TECs: Are they cost-efficient?”Policy Studies15(1) 42–55
4.
BennettRMcCoshanA, 1993Enterprise and Human Resource Development (Paul Chapman, London)
5.
BennettRWicksPMcCoshanA, 1994Local Empowerment and Business Services (University College London Press, London)
6.
BoltonJ E1971Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms Cmnd 4811 (HMSO, London)
7.
CBI, 1993, “Making labour markets work”, Confederation of British Industry, Centre Point, New Oxford Street, London WC1A 1DU
8.
CLES, 1992, “Reforming the TECs—towards a new training strategy”Centre for Local Economic Strategies, Alberton House, St Mary's Parsonage, Manchester M3 2WJ
9.
Crowley-BaintonT, 1993, “TECs and employers developing effective links part 2: TEC–employer links in six TEC areas”, Employment Department, Moorfoot, Sheffield S10 4PQ
10.
CurranJ, 1993, “TECs and small firms: Can TECs reach the small firms other strategies have failed to reach”, paper presented to the All Party Social Science and Policy Group, House of Commons, 17 April; copy available from Small Business Research Centre, Kingston University, Kingston Hill, Surrey KT2 7LB
11.
CurranJJarvisRBlackburnR ABlackS, undated, “Small firms and networks: Constructs, methodological strategies and preliminary findings”, Small Business Research Programme, University of Kingston, Kingston Upon Thames
12.
DansonM WLloydM GNewlandsD, 1992, “Privatism in business development and training: A new approach”British Journal of Education and Work5(3) 7–15
13.
DE, 1993Employment Gazette (October) Department of Employment, London
14.
DES/DE/WO, 1991Education and Training for the 21st CenturyDepartment of Education and Science/Department of Employment/Welsh Office, Cm 1536, Volumes 1 and 2 (HMSO, London)
15.
Ernst and Young, 1993, “Research series: 10. TEC Participation in National Development Activity”, Employment Department, Moorfoot, Sheffield S10 4PQ
16.
EvansR, 1993, “Training and enterprise councils in the north west of England—recent developments and future prospects”Local Economy7347–360
17.
FullerMMurphyMVickerstaffS, 1991, “Training in the Kent economy: Present and prospect”Regional Studies25563–569
18.
GreenAOwenDHasluckC, 1991, “Research series: 84. The development of local labour market typologies: Classification of travel to work areas”, Employment Department, Moorfoot, Sheffield S10 4PQ
19.
GuyRHowellsD, 1994, “TECs: Are they cost-effective?”Policy Studies15(2) 19–36
20.
HaughtonGHartTStrangeIThomasKPeckJ, 1995, “Research series: 46. TECs and their non-employer stakeholders”, Employment Department, Moorfoot, Sheffield S10 4PQ
21.
HowellD C, 1992Statistical Methods for Psychology (PWS-KENT, Boston, MA)
22.
MainD, 1990, “Training and enterprise councils: An agenda for action”Regional Studies24(1) 69–71
23.
MeadR, 1988The Design of Experiments (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
24.
MoyesAWestheadP, 1990, “Environments for new firm formation in Great Britain”Regional Studies24(1) 123–136
25.
NACETT, 1993, “First annual report on national education and training targets”, National Council for Education and Training Targets, Seventh floor, 222 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL
26.
PeckJ, 1993, “The trouble with TECs—a critique of the TECs initiative”Policy and Politics21289–305
27.
RajanA, 1994, “The role of TECs in local economic development”, report for the TEC National Council; copy available from Centre for Research in Employment and Technology in Europe, 2 Holly Hill, Vauxhall Lane, Southborough, Tunbridge Wells TN4 0XD
28.
SAS Institute, 1990Base SAS Procedures, Version 6 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC)
29.
StoreyJ, 1994Understanding the Small Business Sector (Routledge, London)
30.
Tory Reform Group, 1994“The great jobs crisis”, Tory Reform Group, Sheraton House, Castle Park, Cambridge CB3 0AX
31.
VaughanP, 1993, “Research series: 12. TECs and employers developing effective links part 1: A survey”, Employment Department, Moorfoot, Sheffield S10 4PQ
32.
VickerstaffS A, 1985, “Industrial training in Britain: The dilemmas of a neo-corporatist policy”, in Organised Interests and the State Ed. CawsonA (Sage, London)
33.
VickerstaffS A, 1992, “The training needs of small firms”Human Resource Management Journal21–15
34.
VickerstaffS AParkerK T, 1994, “TECs and LECs: Responding to the needs of small businesses”, Department of Social and Public Policy, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent
35.
VickerstaffS AParkerK T, 1995, “Helping small firms: The contribution of TECs and LECs”International Small Business Journal13(4) 56–72
