In this paper a problem is addressed that arises when the boundaries of local governments change: how to distribute the assets of the reconfigured local government. Many state statutes apportion assets according to relative property value. Such statutes, however, raise important economic and legal issues in local public finance. Specifically, fundamental issues arise concerning what assets should be apportioned, how assets should be valued, and whether division formulas prescribed by state statutes achieve their stated objective of dividing according to past contribution. In this paper these issues are addressed by means of simple present-value formulas, and it is demonstrated that most state statutes only rarely achieve their stated goals. The paper concludes with suggestions for a more equitable division process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AFL–CIO v American Petroleum Institute (448 US 607 [1980])
2.
Babineaux v Judiciary Commission (La. 341 So.2d. 396, 400)
3.
BreenECostaFHendonW, 1986, “Annexation: An economic analysis: Whether a small village or town should annex adjacent land is a cost/revenue problem”American Journal of Economics and Sociology45159–172
4.
BrighamE FGapinskiL C, 1988Financial Management (Dryden Press, Hinsdale, IL)
5.
BurchellR WListokinD, 1980A Practitioner's Guide to Fiscal Impact Analysis (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ)
6.
Cassian v Nokomis (254 Wisconsin 94 [1948])
7.
FisherR C, 1988State and Local Public Finance (Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL)
8.
GittmanL J, 1985Principles of Corporate Finance (Harper and Row, New York)
9.
HerriottM H, 1958, “Some problems involved in an apportionment of municipal assets and liabilities upon detachment of territory”Wisconsin Law Revue January, pp 40–51
10.
HerzikE B, 1984, “Projecting the fiscal impact of municipal annexation”Municipal Management747–53
11.
ICMA, 1993The Municipal YearbookInternational City Management Association, 777 N. Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002–4201
12.
Illinois, 1993, “Assumptions of Debts or Partially Annexed Territory Determination”, in Smith–Hurd Illinois Compiled Statutes Annotated (West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN) 65 ILC 5/7-1-31, volume 65, page 134
13.
Indiana, 1983, “Liability of Annexing Municipality for Indebtedness or Other Obligations of Townships: Payment”, in West's Annotated Indiana Code (West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN) title 36, pages 610–611
14.
JohnsonG T, 1988, “Tax-sharing as an alternative to annexation: A Virginia case study”Urban Law and Policy7243–254
15.
Joint School District v Unified School District (41 Wisconsin 2d 165 [1968])
16.
Kentucky, 1995, “Responsibility for Liabilities of Annexed Area – Uniform Taxation”, in Kentucky Revised Statutes (The Miche Company, Charlottesville, VA) volume 841, page 349
17.
McNeilN ANissenbaumD A, 1986, “Annexation agreements”, Municipal Information Service Report, National League of Cities, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NE, Washington, DC 20004
18.
Michigan, 1991, “Same; Incorporation, Annexation, Property, Assets, Liability, Succession, Division; Cemeteries”, in Michigan Compiled Laws (West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN) 117.1–124, page 167
19.
MillsEHamiltonB, 1989Urban Economics (Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL)
20.
Milton Junction v Milton (263 Wisconsin 367 [1952])
21.
Minnesota, 1987, “Apportionment of Assets and Obligations”, in Minnesota Statutes Annotated (West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN) volume 24–25, page 312
22.
OatesW, 1969, “The effects of property taxes and local spending on property values: An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis”Journal of Political Economy77957–970
23.
OlsonM, 1965The logic of collective action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
24.
Record Head Corp. v Sachen (682 F. 2nd. 672 [C.A. Wisconsin 1982])
25.
St. Francis v Public Service Commission (270 Wisconsin 91 [1954])
26.
SamuelsonP, 1954, “The pure theory of public expenditure”Review of Economics and Statistics36387–389
27.
USBC, 19931990 Census of Population and HousingUS Bureau of the Census (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
28.
Wisconsin, 1990a, “Adjustment of Assets and Liabilities on Division of Territory”, in West's Wisconsin Statutes Annoted (West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN) 66.03, page 77
29.
Wisconsin1990b, “Public Utilities”, in West's Wisconsin Statutes Annoted (West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN) 66.03 (4), page 79
