Local government scholars are giving increasing attention to market solutions to urban service delivery. Intermunicipal contracting and privatization are two market approaches to reaching economies of scale. Using national data on over one thousand municipalities from across the United States for the 1992–2007 period, we explore the differences between intermunicipal contracting and privatization and assess how the use of these market approaches relates to efficiency, scale, and public engagement factors. Using probit models for each of four survey years (1992, 1997, 2002, 2007), we find these market solutions are only partial responses to the problem of regional coordination and exhibit important differences with respect to place, management, and political concerns. These market solutions exhibit limited efficiency, equity, and voice benefits.
AnasA, 1999, “The cost and benefits of fragmented metropolitan governance and the new regionalist policies”Planning and Markets2http://www-pam.usc.edu
2.
AndrewsREntwistleT, 2010, “Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory20679–701
3.
BelGCostasA, 2006, “Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in Spain”Journal of Policy Reform91–24
4.
BelGFagedaX, 2007, “Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies”Local Government Studies33517–534
5.
BelGFagedaX, 2008, “Reforming the local public sector: Economics and politics in privatization of water and solid waste”Journal of Economic Policy Reform1145–65
6.
BelGFagedaX, 2011, “Big guys eat big cakes: Firm size and contracting in urban and rural areas”International Public Management Journal144–26
7.
BelGMurM, 2009, “Inter-municipal cooperation, privatization and waste management costs: Evidence from rural municipalities”Waste Management292772–2778
8.
BelGWarnerM E, 2009, “Managing competition in city services: The case of Barcelona”Journal of Urban Affairs31521–535
9.
BelGDijkgraafEFagedaXGradusR, 2010a, “Similar problems, different solutions: Comparing refuse collection in the Netherlands and Spain”Public Administration88479–495
10.
BelGFagedaXWarnerM E, 2010b, “Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management29553–577
11.
BirdR MSlackE, 2007, “An approach to metropolitan governance and finance”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25729–755
12.
BishR LOstromV, 1973Understanding Urban Government: Metropolitan Reform ReconsideredAmerican Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC
13.
BoyneG A, 1998Public Choice Theory and Local Government: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the USA (St Martin's Press, New York)
14.
BriffaultR, 2000, “Localism and regionalism”Buffalo Law Review481–30
15.
BrownT LPotoskiMVan SlykeD M, 2008, “Changing modes of service delivery: How past choices structure future choices”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26127–143
16.
CoateSKnightB, 2011, “Government form and public spending: Theory and evidence from US municipalities”American Economic Journal: Economic Policy382–112
17.
DenhardtJ VDenhardtR B, 2003The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering (ME Sharpe, Armonk, NY)
18.
DijkgraafEGradusR, 2007, “Collusion in the Dutch waste collection market”Local Government Studies33573–588
19.
DijkgraafEGradusR H J M, 2008, “Institutional developments in the Dutch waste-collection market”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26110–126
20.
DrewryG, 2000, “The city and the new contractual public management: The quest for new form of accountability and new public law”, inContracting in the New Public Management: From Economics to Law and Citizenship Eds FortinYVan HasselH, (IOS Press, Amsterdam) pp 255–275
21.
EggersW DO'LearyJ, 1995Revolution at the Roots: Making Our Government Smaller, Better, and Closer to Home (The Free Press, New York)
22.
FeiockR CSteinackerAParkH, 2009, “Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures”Public Administration Review69256–270
23.
FerrisJ MGraddyE, 1991, “Production costs, transaction costs, and local government contractor choice”Economic Inquiry29541–554
24.
FitchK, 2007, “Water privatisation in France and Germany: The importance of local interest groups”Local Government Studies33589–605
25.
FrugG E, 1999City Making: Building Communities without Building Walls (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
26.
FrugG E, 2002, “Beyond regional government”Harvard Law Review1171766–1836
27.
FurlongKBakkerK, 2010, “The contradictions in ‘alternative’ service delivery: Governance, business models, and sustainability in municipal water supply”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28349–368
28.
GreeneJ D, 2002Cities and Privatization: Prospects for the New Century (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ)
29.
HawkinsC V, 2010, “Competition and cooperation: Local government joint ventures for economic development”Journal of Urban Affairs32253–275
30.
HebdonRJaletteP, 2008, “The restructuring of municipal services: A Canada–United States comparison”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26144–158
31.
HefetzAWarnerM E, 2007, “Beyond the market versus planning dichotomy: Understanding privatisation and its reverse in US cities”Local Government Studies33555–572
32.
HefetzAWarnerM E, 2012, “Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory22289–317
33.
HippLWarnerM E, 2008, “Market forces for the unemployed? Training vouchers in Germany and the USA”Social Policy and Administration4277–101
34.
HirschW Z, 1995, “Contracting out by urban governments: A review”Urban Affairs Review30458–472
35.
HodgeG A, 2000Privatization: An International Review of Performance (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
36.
HolzerMFryJ C, 2011Shared Services and Municipal Consolidation: A Critical AnalysisPublic Technology Institute, Alexandria, VA
37.
ICMA, International City County Management Association, Washington, DC
38.
1992Survey of Alternative Service Delivery
39.
1997Survey of Alternative Service Delivery
40.
2002Survey of Alternative Service Delivery
41.
2007Survey of Alternative Service Delivery
42.
Joassart-MarcelliPMussoJ, 2005, “Municipal service provision choices within a metropolitan area”Urban Affairs Review40492–519
43.
JohnsonDMolloyA, 2009, “The quiet crisis and the emergence of La Rele've: A study of crisis perception and executive leadership within the Canadian federal public service, 1997–2002”Canadian Public Administration52203–223
44.
JohnsonK WPelisseroJ PHolienD BMalyM T, 1995, “Local government fiscal burden in nonmetropolitan America”Rural Sociology60381–398
45.
KodrzyckiY K, 1994, “Privatization of local public services: Lessons for New England”New England Economic Review331–46
46.
KruegerSMcGuireM, 2005, “A transaction costs explanation of interlocal government collaboration”, paper 21, Working Group on Interlocal Services Cooperation, http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/interlocal_coop/21
47.
KuindersmaWBoonstraF G, 2010, “The changing role of the state in Dutch regional partnerships”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy281045–1062
48.
KwonSFeiockR C, 2010, “Overcoming the barriers to cooperation: Intergovernmental service agreements”Public Administration Review70876–884
49.
LaveryK, 1999, Smart Contracting for Local Government Services: Processes and Experience (Praeger, Westport, CT)
50.
LevinJTadelisS, 2010, “Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from US cities”Journal of Industrial Economics58507–554
51.
LoweryD, 1998, “Consumer sovereignty and quasi-market failure”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8137–172
52.
LoweryD, 2000, “A transactions costs model of metropolitan governance: Allocation versus redistribution in urban America”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory1049–78
53.
MarvelMMarvelH P, 2007, “Outsourcing oversight: A comparison of monitoring for in-house and contracted services”Public Administration Review67521–530
54.
MorganD REnglandR E, 1988, “The two faces of privatization”Public Administration Review48979–987
55.
MorganD RHirlingerM W, 1991, “Intergovernmental service contracts: A multivariate explanation”Urban Affairs Review27128–144
56.
MortonL WChenY CMorseR S, 2008, “Small town civic structure and interlocal collaboration for public services”City and Community745–60
57.
NalbandianJ, 2005, “Professionals and the conflicting forces of administrative modernization and civic engagement”American Review of Public Administration35311–326
58.
NelsonAFosterK, 1999, “Metropolitan governance structure and income growth”Journal of Urban Affairs2129–34
59.
NelsonM A, 1997, “Municipal government approaches to service delivery: An analysis from a transactions cost perspective”Economic Inquiry3582–96
OsborneD EGaeblerT, 1992Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming Government (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
62.
ParksR BOakersonR J, 1993, “Comparative metropolitan organization: Service production and governance structures in St Louis (MO) and Allegheny County (PA)”Publius2319–40
63.
ParrJRiehmJMcFarlandC, 2006Guide to Successful Local Government Collaboration in America's RegionsNational League of Cities, Washington, DC
64.
PoisterTStreibG, 1999, “Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice”Public Administration Review59325–335
65.
ReederRJansenA, 1995Rural Government: Poor Counties, 1962–1987Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Economy Division, Washington, DC
66.
ReganMSmithJLoveP, 2011, “Infrastructure procurement: Learning from private–public partnership experiences ‘down under’”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29363–378
67.
SagerT, 2001, “Positive theory of planning: The social choice approach”Environment and Planning A33629–647
68.
SavasE S, 1987Privatization: The Key to Better Government (Chatham House, Chatham, NJ)
69.
ShreshtaMFeiockR C, 2010, “Transaction cost, exchange embeddedness, and interlocal cooperation in local public goods”Political Research Quarterly64573–587
70.
SohnCReitelBWaltherO, 2009, “Cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: The case of Luxembourg, Basel, and Geneva”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27922–939
71.
SteinR M, 1990Urban Alternatives: Public and Private Markets in the Provision of Local Services (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA)
72.
SwanstromT, 2001, “What we argue about when we argue about regionalism”Journal of Urban Affairs23479–496
73.
TieboutC M, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424
74.
TrouttD D, 2000, “Ghettoes made easy: The metamarket/antimarket dichotomy and the legal challenges of inner-city economic development”Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review35427–507
75.
US Bureau of the Census, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
WalkerR MLiL H, 2006, “Institutional reform in the provision of public services in Hong Kong: An efficiency evaluation”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24597–614
84.
WarnerM E, 2001, “State policy under devolution: Redistribution and centralization”National Tax Journal54541–556
85.
WarnerM E, 2006, “Market-based governance and the challenge for rural governments: U.S. trends”Social Policy and Administration: An International Journal of Policy and Research40612–631
86.
WarnerM E, 2008, “Reversing privatization, rebalancing government reform: Markets, deliberation and planning”Policy and Society27163–174
87.
WarnerM E, 2009, “Civic government or market-based governance? The limits of privatization for rural local governments”Agriculture and Human Values26133–143
88.
WarnerM E, 2011a, “Club goods and local government: Questions for planners”Journal of the American Planning Association77155–166
89.
WarnerM E, 2011b, “Competition or cooperation in urban service delivery?”Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics82421–435
90.
WarnerM EGradusR, 2011, “The consequences of implementing a child care voucher: Evidence from Australia, the Netherlands and USA”Social Policy and Administration45569–592
91.
WarnerM EHebdonR, 2001, “Local government restructuring: Privatization and its alternatives”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management20315–336
92.
WarnerM EHefetzA, 2002a, “Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity and voice”Urban Affairs Review3870–89
93.
WarnerMHefetzA, 2002b, “The uneven distribution of market solutions for public goods”Journal of Urban Affairs24445–459
94.
WarnerMHefetzA, 2003, “Rural–urban differences in privatization: Limits to the competitive state”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21703–718
95.
WarnerM EHefetzA, 2008, “Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public–private delivery of city services”Public Administration Review68150–161
96.
WarnerM EPrattJ E, 2005, “Spatial diversity in local government revenue effort under decentralization: A neural-network approach”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23657–677
