In this paper we explore the spin-off process from London's universities using a regional innovation systems (RIS) framework. We examine the pattern of spin-offs in the context of changes in institutional support systems, both within the universities and in the London region. The majority of the university-related spin-offs are small and medium-sized enterprises concentrated in biomedical sectors, as elsewhere. However, over a third have left London. We explore these patterns, the implications for understanding the role of universities in RIS, and consequent policy implications.
AldrichH E, 1999Organizations Evolving (Sage, London)
2.
ArundelABordoyC, 2006, “Collaboration and innovation outputs”, in Knowledge Flows in European Industry Eds CaloghirouYConstantelouAVonortasN (Routledge, London) pp 158–182
3.
AsheimB TGertlerM S, 2005, “The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems”, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Eds FagerbergJMoweryDNelsonR R (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 291–317
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP, 2004, “Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”Progress in Human Geography2831–56
6.
BatheltHFoglerD FMunroA, 2010, “A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development”Technovation30519–532
BoucherGConwayCVan der MeerE, 2003, “Tiers of engagement by universities in their region's development”Regional Studies37887–897
10.
ClarkB R, 1998Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation (Elsevier, New York)
11.
ClarkG LTraceyPSmithLawton H, 2002, “Agents, endowments, and path dependence: Making sense of European regional development”Geographische Zeitschrift89165–180
12.
CookeP, 1998, “Introduction: Origins of the concept”, in Regional Innovation Systems2nd edition, Eds BracykHCookePHeidenreichM (Routledge, London) pp 2–25
13.
CookeP, 2004, “Evolution of regional innovation systems: Emergence, theory, challenge for action”, in Regional Innovation Systems2nd edition, Eds BracykHCookePHeidenreichM (Routledge, London) pp 1–18
14.
CookePBoekholtPTödtlingF, 2000, “The governance of innovation in Europe”, in Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness (Pinter, London)
15.
DIUS, 2008Innovation Nation Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (The Stationery Office, London)
16.
DoloreuxD, 2002, “What we should know about regional systems of innovation”Technology in Society24243–263
DruihleCGarnseyE, 2004, “Do academic spin-offs differ and does it matter?”Journal of Technology Transfer29269–285
19.
FaggianAMcCannP, 2009, “Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions”Cambridge Journal of Economics33317–333
20.
FeldmanM P, 2001, “The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context”Industrial and Corporate Change10861–891
21.
FeldmanM PAudretschD B, 1999, “Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization, and localized competition”European Economic Review43409–429
22.
FrenkelA, 2001, “Why high tech firms choose to locate in or near metropolitan regions”Urban Studies381083–1101
23.
GeunaAMuscioA, 2009, “The governance of university knowledge transfer”Minerva4793–114
24.
GoldsteinHDruckerJ, 2006, “The economic development impacts of universities on regions: Do size and distance matter?”Economic Development Quarterly2022–43
25.
GordonIMcCannP, 2000, “Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks?”Urban Studies37513–532
26.
GunasekaraC, 2006, “Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems”Journal of Technology Transfer31101–113
27.
HarrisonRLeitchC, 2010, “Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK”Regional Studies441241–1262
28.
HugginsR, 2008, “Universities and knowledge-based venturing: Finance, management and networks in London”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development20185–206
29.
IacobucciDIacopiniAMicozziAOrsiniS, 2011, “Fostering entrepreneurship in academic spin-offs”International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business12513–533
30.
SmithLawton Hbagchi-SenS, 2010, “Triple helix and regional development: A perspective from Oxfordshire”Technology Analysis and Strategic Management22805–818
31.
SmithLawton HHoK W, 2006, “Measuring the performance of Oxfordshire's spin-off companies”Research Policy351554–1568
32.
SmithLawton HWatersR, 2011, “Scientific labour markets, networks and regional innovation systems”Regional Studies45961–978
33.
LendelI, 2010, “The impact of research universities on regional economies: The concept of university products”Economic Development Quarterly24210–230
34.
DahlstrandLindholm A, 1997, “Growth and inventiveness in technology-based firms”Research Policy26331–344
35.
LundvallB-Å (Ed.), 1992National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (Pinter, London)
36.
MarkusenA, 1999, “Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies”Regional Studies33869–884
37.
MoseySWrightM, 2007, “From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology based academic entrepreneurs”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31909–935
38.
MoulaertFSekiaF, 2003, “Territorial innovation models: A critical survey”Regional Studies37289–302
39.
PACEC, 2003The Cambridge Phenomenon: Fulfilling the Potential. Public and Corporate Economic Consultants, Cambridge
40.
PACEC, 2009Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Role of HEFCE/OSI Third Stream Funding: Culture Change and Embedding Capacity in the Higher Education Sector Towards Economic Impact. Public and Corporate Economic Consultants, Cambridge
41.
PirnayFSurlemontBNlemvoF, 2003, “Toward a typology of university spin-offs”Small Business Economics21355–369
42.
PowerDMalmbergA, 2008, “The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: In what sense a regional problem?”Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society1233–245
43.
RSC, 2006Chemical Science Spin-outs from UK Universities: Review of Critical Success Factors. Royal Society of Chemists and Chemistry Leadership Council, London
44.
SainsburyD, 2007The Race to the Top: A Review of Government's Science and Innovation Policies (HM Treasury, London)
45.
SchumpeterJ A, 1912[1934] Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (Duncker and Humblot, Leipzig) English translation published in 1934 as The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA)
WarrenAHankeRTrozerD, 2008, “Models for university technology transfer: Resolving conflicts between mission and methods and the dependency on geographic location”Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society1219–232
50.
WoodP, 2009, “Service competitiveness and urban innovation policies in the UK: The implications of the ‘London paradox’”Regional Studies431047–1059
51.
WrightMClarysseBMustarPLockettA, 2007Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
52.
ZangJ, 2008, “The performance of university spin-offs: An exploratory analysis using venture capital data”Journal of Technology Transfer34255–285
