The extensive literature on academic entrepreneurship has focused almost entirely on science and engineering, while little is known about the extent of it in other disciplines, most notably the creative arts. We analyse the context, motivations, and variety of academic entrepreneurship in the creative arts using a recently completed survey of UK academics, providing microdata on 1108 academics. The data are complemented using institutional data taken from the Higher Education–Business and Community Interaction Survey, and data on individual submissions to the Research Assessment Exercise 2008. We highlight four characteristics of academic environment in the creative arts that strongly influence the nature of the entrepreneurship in the field: the practice-based nature of the research; the role of networks, particularly networks linked to teaching; the importance on nonmonetary rewards; and the role of geography. Our results indicate that academic entrepreneurship in the creative arts is varied and extensive, and that it could be better supported by policy.
AbramovskyLHarrisonRSimpsonH, 2007, “University research and the location of business R&D”Economic Journal117114–141
2.
AbreuMGrinevichV, 2013, “The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities”Research Policy42408–422
3.
AbreuMGrinevichVHughesAKitsonM, 2009Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors. UK Innovation Research Centre, University of Cambridge, and Imperial College, London
4.
AgrawalAHendersonR, 2002, “Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT”Management Science4844–60
5.
AHRC, 2007Practice-led Research in Art, Design and Architecture. Arts and Humanities Research Council, Swindon, Wilts
6.
AzoulayPDingWStuartT, 2007, “The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities?”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization63599–623
7.
BercovitzJFeldmanM, 2008, “Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level”Organization Science1969–89
8.
BIS, 2010, “Higher education funding for 2011–2012 and beyond”, letter to the Chairman of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, Department for Business Innovation and Skills, London
9.
BrownR, 2007, “Promoting entrepreneurship in arts education”, in Entrepreneurship in the Creative Industries: An International Perspective Ed. HenryC, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 126–141
10.
BrowneJ, 2010, “Securing a sustainable future for higher education: An independent review of higher education funding and student finance”, http://www.independent.gov.uk/browne-report
11.
CarayolN, 2007, “Academic incentives, research organization and patenting at a large French university”Economics of Innovation and New Technology16119–138
12.
CareyCSmithKMartinL M, 2009, “Cross-university enterprise education collaboration as a community of practice”Education and Training51696–706
13.
ChapainCCookePDe ProprisLMacNeillSMateos-GarciaJ, 2010, “Creative clusters and innovation: Putting creativity on the map”, National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, London
D'EstePIammarinoS, 2010, “The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships”Papers in Regional Science89335–350
16.
DietzJ SBozemanB, 2005, “Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital”Research Policy34349–367
17.
Di GregorioDShaneS, 2003, “Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?”Research Policy32209–227
18.
DingW WMurrayFStuartT E, 2006, “Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences”Science313665–667
19.
FraylingC, 1993, “Research in art and design”, Royal College of Art Research Papers, London
20.
HendersonRJaffeATrajtenbergM, 1998, “Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988”Review of Economics and Statistics80119–127
21.
HesmondhalghD, 2008, “Cultural and creative industries”, in The Sage Handbook of Cultural Analysis Eds BennettTFrowJ, (Sage, London) pp 552–569
22.
JayneM, 2005, “Creative industries: The regional dimension?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23537–556
23.
JensenR AThursbyJ GThursbyM C, 2003, “Disclosure and licensing of university inventions: The best we can do with the st we get to work with”International Journal of Industrial Organization211271–1300
24.
KellyUMcNicollI, 2011, “Through a glass, darkly: Measuring the social value of universities” National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement, Bristol
25.
KlofstenMJones-EvansD, 2000, “Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: The case of Sweden and Ireland”Small Business Economics14299–309
26.
LaursenKReichsteinTSalterA, 2011, “Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom”Regional Studies45507–523
27.
LevinS GStephanP E, 1991, “Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists”American Economic Review81114–132
28.
LinkA NSiegelD SBozemanB, 2007, “An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer”Industrial and Corporate Change16641–655
29.
Macho-StadlerIPérez-CastrilloPVeugelersR, 2007, “Licensing of university inventions: The role of a technology transfer office”International Journal of Industrial Organization25483–510
30.
McMahonW, 2009Higher Learning, Greater Good: The Private and Social Benefits of Higher Education (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
31.
MansfieldELeeJ-Y, 1996, “The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support”Research Policy251047–1058
32.
MarkmanG DPhanP HBalkinD BGianiodisP T, 2005, “Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer”Journal of Business Venturing20241–263
33.
MoseySWrightM, 2007, “From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31909–935
34.
MurrayF, 2004, “The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life”Research Policy33643–659
35.
MurrayFGrahamL, 2007, “Buying science and selling science: Gender differences in the market for commercial science”Industrial and Corporate Change16657–689
36.
Nesta, 2007, “Creating entrepreneurship: Higher education and the creative industries”, Higher Education Academy Art Design Media Subject Centre and the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, London Nesta, 2008, “Arts and humanities research and innovation”, National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, London
37.
NiedererKImamiY, 2008, “Developing a framework for managing tacit knowledge in research using knowledge management tools”, Proceedings of the Design Research Society Biennial Conference, Sheffield, 16–19 July; available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive, http://shura.shu.ac.uk/507/
38.
O'SheaR PAllenT JMorseK PO'GormanCRocheF, 2007, “Delineating the anatomy of entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience”R&D Management371–16
39.
Owen-SmithJPowellW W, 2003, “The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity”Research Policy321695–1711
40.
PonziniD, 2009, “Urban implications of cultural policy networks: The case of the Mount Vernon Cultural District in Baltimore”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27433–450
41.
SchartingerDSchibanyAGasslerH, 2001, “Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria”Journal of Technology Transfer26255–269
42.
SiegelD SWaldmanD ALinkA N, 2003, “Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study”Research Policy3227–48
43.
StephanP EEl-GanainyA, 2007, “The entrepreneurial puzzle: Explaining the gender gap”Journal of Technology Transfer32475–487
44.
StephanP EGurmuSSumellABlackG, 2007, “Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from a survey of doctorate recipients”Economics of Innovation and New Technology1671–99
45.
StokesD E, 1997Pasteurs Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC)
46.
StuartT EDingW W, 2006, “When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences”American Journal of Sociology11297–144
47.
TaylorC, 2007, “Developing relationships between higher education, enterprise and innovation in the creative industries”, in Entrepreneurship in the Creative Industries: An International Perspective Ed. HenryC, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 178–196
48.
ThursbyJ GThursbyM C, 2005, “Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty”Journal of Technology Transfer30343–353
49.
Universities UK, 2010Creating Prosperity: The Role of Higher Education in Driving the UK's Creative Economy London
50.
WhittingtonK BSmith-DoerrL, 2005, “Gender and commercial science: Women's patenting in the life sciences”Journal of Technology Transfer30355–370
51.
WrightMLockettAClarysseBBinksM, 2006, “University spin-out companies and venture capital”Research Policy35481–501
