In many countries macroeconomic policy making and land administration operate independently. A review of the literature from both disciplines supports this view. The failure to include authoritative land information generated by a country's land administration system in macroeconomic policy making can result in suboptimal governmental fiscal and monetary decisions. This is demonstrated through two case studies of the Australian context, with a focus on managing land taxes and administering interest on debt financing. A simplified empirical model is derived from the study results. The model aims to articulate and promote the important role of government land information in policy and decision making. Practical implementation will require determination of the legal, institutional, and technical requirements of the model.
BirnerR.WittmerH., 2004, “On the ‘efficient boundaries of the state’: The contribution of transaction-costs economics to the analysis of decentralization and devolution in natural resource management”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22667–685
CoxA., 1983, “The unintended consequences of policy initiation: A study of the British Conservative Government's property policy in the 1970s”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1347–356
18.
DaleP.McLaughlinJ., 1999Land Administration (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
DeiningerK.BinswangerH., 1999, “The evolution of the World's Bank's land policy: Principles, experiences, and future challenges”World Bank Research Observer14247–276
21.
DenmanR., 1978The Place of Property: A New Recognition of the Function and Form of Property Rights in Land (Geographical Publication, Berkhamsted, Herts)
22.
De SotoH., 2000The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else (Black Swan, London)
23.
DoldeW.TirtirogluD., 1997, “Temporal and spatial information in real estate price changes and variances”Real Estate Economics25539–565
MilgromP.StokeyN., 1982, “Information, trade and common knowledge”Journal of Economic Theory2617–27
36.
MorganG., 1985Land Information Systems: Design Considerations for the Organisation of Supporting Technologies. World Bank, Washington, DC
37.
MunasingheM., 2006Macroeconomic Policies for Sustainable Growth: Analytical Framework and Policy Studies of Brazil and Chile (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
38.
NorthD.ThomasR., 1973The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
39.
NRC, 1980, “Need for a multipurpose cadastre”, Panel on a Multipurpose Cadastre, Committee on Geodesy, Assembly of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, DC
Rodriguez-PoseA.GillN., 2003, “The global trend towards devolution and its implications”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21333–351
47.
RoyD., 2010, “Building the nation”GIS Development1422–27
48.
SedunaryM., 1984, “LOTS, and the nodal approach to total land information system”, in Proceedings of The Decision Maker and Land Information Systems: FIG Commission 3 International Symposium, Eds HamiltonA.McLaughlinJ., October, International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), Kalvebod Brygge31–33., DK-1780 Copenhagen
UNECE, 2005, “Land administration in the UNECE region: Development trends and main principles”, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Information Service, Palais des Nations, CH 1211, Geneva 10, Switzerland, http://www.unece.org/env/documents/2005/wpla/ECE-HBP-140-e.pdf
51.
WallaceJ.WilliamsonI., 2006, “Building land markets”Journal of Land Use Policy23123–135
52.
WealeM., 1989Macroeconomic Policy: Inflation, Wealth, and the Exchange Rate (Unwin Hyman, London)
