In this paper an argument is developed in support of the relevance of social theory for the region. Characterized by bridging across conceptual and methodological divides, by the increasing prominence of the role of space, context, and human agency, social theory exhibits an affinity with the regional development theory of the Regional Planning Association of America (RPAA) in the 1920s. This paper provides a brief account of the RPAA's approach to regional synthesis. The author aims to build upon insights offered by social theories in dealing with multifaceted regional development phenomena, identifying areas of overlap with the approach of the RPAA. The paper is concluded with a brief discussion of regional policy implications and the practice of social theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckoffR L, 1979, “Resurrecting the future of operational research”Journal Operational Research Society30189–199
2.
AlbertsenN, 1988, “Postmodernism, post-Fordism, and critical social theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6339–365
3.
AllenJ, 1987, “Realism as method”Antipode19(2) 231–239
4.
BenderT, 1986, “Wholes and parts: The need for synthesis in American history”Journal of American History73(1) 120–136
5.
BennettR JThornesJ B, 1988, “Geography in the United Kingdom, 1984–1988”The Geographical Journal154(1) 23–48
6.
BernsteinR, 1976The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA)
7.
BernsteinR, 1983Beyond Objectivism and Realism (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA)
8.
BestSKellnerD, 1991Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations (Guilford Press, New York)
9.
BhaskarR, 1979The Possibility of Naturalism (Harvester Press, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
10.
BhaskarR, 1989Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy (Verso, London)
11.
BrownL A, 1988, “Reflections on Third World development: Ground level reality, exogenous forces, and conventional paradigms”Economic Geography64255–278
12.
BrownL A, 1991Place, Migration and Development in the Third World (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants)
13.
CadwalladerM, 1988, “Urban geography and social theory”Urban Geography9(3) 227–251
14.
CallinicosA, 1989Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique (Polity Press, Cambridge)
15.
ChurchmanC W, 1979The Systems Approach and its Enemies (Basic Books, New York)
16.
CiucciGDal CoFManieri-EllaMTafuriM, 1983The American City—From Civil War to the New Deal (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
17.
CornellD, 1992The Philosophy of the Limit (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants)
18.
CoxR KMairA, 1991, “From localized social structures to localities as agents”Environment and Planning A23197–213
19.
DanielsS, 1985, “Arguments for a humanistic geography”, in The Future of Geography Ed. JohnstonR J, (Methuen, London) pp 143–158
20.
DearM J, 1986, “Postmodernism and planning”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space4367–384
21.
DuncanSSavageM, 1991, “New perspectives on the locality debate”Environment and Planning A23155–164
22.
FramptonK, 1983, “Towards a critical regionalism”, in Postmodern Culture Ed. FosterH, (Pluto Press, London) pp 16–30
23.
FriedmannJ, 1987Planning in the Public Domain (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
24.
FriedmannJForestY, 1988, “The politics of place: Toward a political economy of territorial planning”, in Regional Economic Development Eds HigginsBSavoieD J, (Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA) pp 115–130
25.
FriedmannJWeaverC, 1979Territory and Function: The Evolution of Regional Planning (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
26.
GiddensA, 1981A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
27.
GiddensA, 1984The Constitution of Society (University of California Press, Berkeley CA)
28.
GregsonN, 1989, “On the (ir)relevance of structuration theory to empirical research”, in Critical Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics Eds HeldDThompsonJ, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 235–248
29.
HansenN, 1988, “Economic development and regional heterogeneity: A reconsideration of regional policy for the United States”Economic Development Quarterly2(2) 107–118
30.
HarveyD, 1978, “On countering the Marxian myth—Chicago style”Comparative Urban Research628–45
31.
HarveyD, 1987a, “Three myths in search of a reality in urban studies”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5367–376
32.
HarveyD, 1987b, “Flexible accumulation through urbanization: Reflections on ‘postmodernism’ in the American city”Antipode19(3) 260–286
33.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry Into the Origins of Cultural Change (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
34.
JacobsJ, 1984Cities and the Wealth of Nations (Vintage Books, New York)
JonasA, 1988a, “Comment on ‘structuration theory and attempts at integration in human geography’”The Professional Geographer40(2) 219–221
37.
JonasA, 1988b, “A new regional geography of localities?”Area20(2) 101–110
38.
KuklinskiA, 1987, “Regional policies: Experiences and prospects”International Social Science Journal112173–186
39.
LiossatosP, 1980, “Spatial dynamics: Some conceptual and mathematical issues”Environment and Planning A121051–1071
40.
MackayeBMumfordL, 1929, “Regional planning”Encyclopedia Britannica14th edition, number 19, pp 71–72
41.
MasseyD, 1979, “In what sense a regional problem?”Regional Studies13233–243
42.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (Macmillan, London)
43.
MasseyD, 1985, “New directions in space”, in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ, (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 9–19
44.
MasseyDMeeganR A, 1979The Geography of Industrial Reorganization Progress in Planning10155–237
45.
MertzE, 1989, “Alternative paradigms for legal theory”Northwestern University Law Review83(1, 2) 1–9
46.
MoosA IDearM J, 1986, “Structuration theory in urban analysis: 1. Theoretical exegesis”Environment and Planning A18231–252
47.
MumfordL, 1938The Culture of Cities (Harcourt, Brace, New York)
48.
PasiS A, 1991, “Deconstructing regions: Notes on the scales of spatial life”Environment and Planning A23239–256
49.
PredA, 1984, “Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places”Annals of the Association of American Geographers74–92, 279–297
50.
SayerA, 1979, “Understanding urban models versus understanding cities”Environment and Planning A11885–862
51.
SayerA, 1982, “Explanation in economic geography: Abstraction vs. generalization”Progress in Human Geography668–88
52.
SayerA, 1985a, “Industry and space: A sympathetic critique of radical research”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space33–29
53.
SayerA, 1985b, “Realism and geography”, in The Future of Geography Ed. JohnstonR J, (Methuen, London) pp 159–173
54.
SayerA, 1989, “The ‘new’ regional geography and problems of narrative”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7253–276
55.
ScottA JRoweisS T, 1977, “Urban planning in theory and practice: A reappraisal”Environment and Plannning A91097–1119
56.
ScottR HNigroN, 1982Principles of Macroeconomics (Macmillan, New York)
57.
SeidmanSWagnerD G, 1992Postmodernism and Social Theory: The Debate Over General Theory (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge)
58.
SimonH A, 1981The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
SojaE W, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London)
61.
SteinC, 1957Toward New Towns for America (Reinhold, New York)
62.
StohrW BTaylorF, (Eds), 1981Development from Above or Below? The Dialectics of Regional Planning in Developing Countries (John Wiley, New York)
63.
ThomasM J, 1982, “The procedural planning theory of A. Faludi”, in Critical Readings in Planning Theory Ed. ParisC, (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 13–25
64.
ThriftN, 1983, “Editorial: The politics of context”Environment and Planning D1371–376
65.
Van ZandtD E, 1989, “The relevance of social theory to legal theory”Northwestern University Law Review83(1, 2) 10–37
66.
de la BlacheP Vidal, 1926Principles of Human Geography (Henry Holt, New York)
67.
WeaverC, 1981, “Development theory and the regional question: A critique of spatial planning and its detractors”, in Development From Above or Below? Eds StohrW BTaylorF, (John Wiley, New York) pp 73–105
68.
WeaverC, 1985, “Regions, decentralization and the new global economy: An overview”The Canadian Journal of Regional Science8(3) 283–297
69.
ZukinS, 1991Landscapes of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
