In this paper we offer both a broad survey of the literature on fiscal federalism and long-run economic performance, and a detailed report of some of our own recent studies in this field. We look at the difference between study types (cross-country versus single-country studies), and at the relevance of the broader institutional framework into which fiscal decentralization is embedded. We also look into structural change and intergovernmental transfers as a detailed mechanism through which federalism may have an impact on aggregate economic performance. It turns out that fiscal decentralization has no robust effect on growth, but the evidence hints at a positive effect on overall productivity, conditional on the broader institutional framework.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AghionPHowittP, 2006, “Appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework”Journal of the European Economic Association4269–314
2.
AkaiNNishimuraYSakataM, 2007, “Complementarity, fiscal decentralization and economic growth”Economics of Governance8339–362
3.
BaskaranTFeldL P, 2009, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth on OECD countries: Is there a relationship?”, WP 2721, CESifo, Munich
BesleyTCoateS, 2003, “Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: A political economy analysis”Journal of Public Economics872611–2637
6.
BoadwayRKeenM, 1996, “Efficiency and the optimal direction of federal-state transfers”International Tax and Public Finance3137–155
7.
BodmanPFordK, 2010, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the OECD” Applied Economics (forthcoming)
8.
BodmanPCampbellHHeatonK AHodgeA, 2009, “Fiscal decentralisation, macroeconomic conditions and economic growth in Australia”, School of Economics, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland
9.
BrennanGBuchananJ M, 1980The Power to Tax. Analytical Foundation of a Fiscal Constitution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
BreussFEllerM, 2004, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: Is there really a link?”, DICE Report 2, CESifo, Munich, pages 3–9
11.
BruecknerJ K, 1999, “Fiscal federalism and capital accumulation”Journal of Public Economic Theory1205–224
12.
BruecknerJ K, 2006, “Fiscal and economic growth”Journal of Public Economics902107–2120
13.
BuettnerT, 2002, “Fiscal federalism and interstate risk sharing: Empirical evidence from Germany” Economics Letters74195–202
14.
Bundesgesetzblatt, 2006, “Federalism Reform Act 2006”, Teil I, Nr.41, pages 2034 and 2098
15.
CaiHTreismanD, 2004, “State corroding federalism”Journal of Public Economics88819–843
16.
DavoodiHZouH, 1998, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study” Journal of Urban Economics43244–257
17.
EdwardsR A, 2005, “The structure of authority, federalism, commitment and economic growth” Economic Theory25629–648
18.
FeldL PSchalteggerC A, 2005, “Voters as hard budget constraints: On the determination of intergovernmental grants” Public Choice123147–169
19.
FeldL PVon HagenJ, 2007, “Federal republic of Germany”, in The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives, A Global Dialogue on Federalism Seriesvolume 4, Ed. ShahA (McGill University Press, Montreal, QC) pp 125–150
20.
FeldL PKirchgässnerGSchalteggerCh, 2006, “Fiscal federalism and economic performance: Evidence from Swiss cantons”, Department of Economics, University of Heidelberg
21.
FeldL PSchnellenbachJBaskaranT, 2009a, “Fiscal federalism, decentralization and economic growth: A meta-analysis”, Department of Economics, University of Heidelberg
22.
FeldL PBaskaranTNeckerS, 2009b, “Decentralization and economic performance: Evidence from a cooperative federation”, Department of Economics, University of Heidelberg
23.
HatfieldJ W, 2006, “Federalism, taxation and economic growth”, RP 1929, Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA
24.
HuizingaHNielsenS B, 1997, “Capital income and profit taxation with foreign ownership of firms”Journal of International Economics42149–165
25.
HutherJShahA, 1999, “Applying a simple measure of good governance to the debate of fiscal decentralization”, WP 1894, World Bank, Washington, DC
26.
InmanR PRubinfeldD L, 1997, “Rethinking federalism”Journal of Economic Perspectives11(4) 43–64
27.
KöthenbürgerMLockwoodB, 2010, “Does tax competition really promote growth?”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control34191–206
28.
KotsogiannisChSchwagerR, 2006, “Political uncertainty and policy innovation”Journal of Public Economic Theory8779–805
29.
Lago-PeñasSVentelouB, 2006, “The effects of regional sizing on growth”Public Choice127415–435
30.
LejourAVerbonH, 1997, “Tax competition and redistribution in a two-country edogenous growth model”International Tax and Public Finance4485–497
31.
MadièsTVentelouB, 2004, “Federalism in an endogenous growth model with tax base sharing and heterogeneous education services”Papers in Regional Science831–18
32.
MankiwN GRomerDWeilD N, 1992, “A contribution to the empirics of economic growth”Quarterly Journal of Economics107407–437
33.
Martinez-VazquezJMcNabR, 2003, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth”World Development311597–1616
34.
OatesW E, 1972Fiscal Federalism (Harcourt Brace, New York)
35.
OatesW E, 1993, “Fiscal decentralization and economic development”National Tax Journal46237–243
36.
OatesW E, 1999, “An essay on fiscal federalism”Journal of Economic Literature371120–1149
37.
OatesW E, 2005, “Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism”International Tax and Public Finance12349–373
38.
QianYWeingastB R, 1997, “Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives” Journal of Economic Perspectives1183–92
39.
RoddenJ, 2004, “Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement”Comparative Politics36481–500
40.
RoddenJRose-AckermanS, 1997, “Does federalism preserve markets?”Virginia Law Review831521–1572
41.
RoddenJEskelandG SLitvackJ, 2003Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
42.
Rodríguez-PoseAEzcurraR, 2010a, “Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from OECD countries”Journal of Economic Geography101–25
43.
Rodríguez-PoseAEzcurraR, 2010b, “Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis”Journal of Economic Geography10619–644
44.
Rodríguez-PoseAKroijerA, 2009, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in central and eastern Europe”Growth and Change40387–417
45.
Rodríguez-PoseATijmstraS A RBwireA, 2009, “Fiscal decentralisation, efficiency, and growth”Environment and Planning A412041–2062
46.
Rose-AckermanS, 1980, “Risk-taking and reelection: Does federalism promote innovation?”Journal of Legal Studies9593–616
47.
ScharpfF W, 1988, “The joint decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration”Public Administration66239–287
48.
SchnellenbachJ, 2007, “Public entrepreneurship and the economics of reform”Journal of Institutional Economics3183–202
49.
SchnellenbachJ, 2008, “Rational ignorance is not bliss: When do lazy voters learn from decentralized policy experiments?”Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik228372–393
50.
SchnellenbachJBaskaranTFeldL P, 2009, “Creative destruction and fiscal institutions: A long-run case-study for three regions”, Papers of Economics and Evolution 0908, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena
51.
ShahA, 2007, “Introduction: Principles of fiscal federalism”, in The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Studies Ed. ShahA (McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, QC) pp 3–42
52.
StegarescuD, 2005, “Public sector decentralization: Measurement concepts and recent international trends” Fiscal Studies26301–333
53.
StrumpfK, 2002, “Does government decentralization increase policy innovation?” Journal of Public Economic Theory4207–241
54.
ThießenU, 2003, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in high income OECD countries”Fiscal Studies24237–274
55.
ThorntonJ, 2007, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered”Journal of Urban Economics6164–70
56.
TieboutCh M, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424
57.
TreismanD, 2000, “Decentralization and the quality of government”, Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
58.
TsebelisG, 1995, “Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism”British Journal of Political Science25289–325
59.
Von HayekF, 1948Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
60.
WeingastB R, 1995, “The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization111–31
61.
WredeM, 1999, “Tragedy of the fiscal common? Fiscal stock externalities in a Leviathian model of federalism”Public Choice101177–193
62.
XieDZouHDavoodiH, 1999, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States”Journal of Urban Economics45228–239
