On the basis of aggregated and individual-level survey data of national and regional elections in Spain, this paper analyzes how economic voting is impacted by vertical and horizontal dimensions of clarity of responsibility. Our findings suggest that economic voting is enhanced when mechanisms of accountability are simple.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguilarPSánchez-CuencaI, 2008, “Performance or representation? The determinants of voting in complex political contexts”, in Voters, Institutions and Accountability Eds MaravallJ M, Sánchez-CuencaI (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 105–130
2.
AidtT S, 2000, “Economic voting and information”Electoral Studies19349–362
3.
AlonsoS, 2008, “Enduring ethnicity: The political survival of incumbent ethnic parties in western democracies”, in Voters, Institutions and Accountability Eds MaravallJ M, Sánchez-CuencaI (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 82–104
4.
AndersonC D, 2006, “Economic voting and multilevel governance: A comparative individual-level analysis”American Journal of Political Science50449–463
5.
AndersonC D, 2008, “Economic voting, multilevel governance and information in Canada”Canadian Journal of Political Science41329–354
6.
AndersonC J, 1995, “The dynamics of public support for coalition governments”Comparative Political Studies28350–383
7.
AndersonC J, 2000, “Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective”Electoral Studies19151–170
8.
AndersonC J, 2007a, “The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability”Annual Review of Political Science10271–296
9.
AndersonC J, 2007b, “Interaction of structures and voter behavior”, in The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior Eds DaltonR J, KlingemannH D (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 589–609
10.
CastellsA, 2001, “The role of intergovernmental finance in achieving diversity and cohesion: The case of Spain”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19189–206
11.
CutlerF, 2004, “Government responsibility and electoral accountability in federations”Publius: The Journal of Federalism3419–38
12.
Delli-CarpiniM XKeeterS, 1996What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
13.
DGCHT, 2001, La descentralización del gasto público en España. Período 1984–1998Directorate-General for Financial Coordination with the Subcentral Governments, Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda, Madrid
14.
DownsW M, 1999, “Accountability payoffs in federal systems? Competing logics and evidence from Europe's newest federation”Publius: The Journal of Federalism2987–110
15.
DuchR MPalmerH D, 2002, “Heterogeneous perceptions of economic conditions”, in cross-national perspective”Economic Voting Eds DorussenH, TaylorM (Routledge, London) pp 139–172
16.
DuchR MPalmerH DAndersonC J, 2000, “Heterogeneity in perceptions of national economic conditions”American Journal of Political Science44635–652
17.
Escobar-LemmonM, 2003, “Political support for decentralization: An analysis of the Colombian and Venezuelan legislatures”American Journal of Political Science47683–697
18.
FerraraFHerronE SNishikawaM, 2005Mixed Electoral Systems: Contamination and its Consequences (Palgrave Macmillan, New York)
19.
García-DíazM.A., 2007, “Los presupuestos de las Comunidades Autónomas en 2007”, WP 15/07, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Madrid
20.
GélineauFRemmerK L, 2003, “Subnational electoral choice: Economic and referendum voting in Argentina, 1983–1999”Comparative Political Studies36801–821
21.
GélineauFRemmerK L, 2005, “Political decentralization and electoral accountability: The Argentine experience, 1983–2001”British Journal of Political Science36133–157
22.
GolderM, 2006, “Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation”American Journal of Political Science5034–48
HamiltonA, 1961 [1788] The Federalist Papers (Mentor, New York)
25.
HoogheLMarksG, 2001Multi-level Governance and European Integration (Rowan and Littlefield, Lanham, MD)
26.
KinderD R, 1983, “Diversity and complexity in American public opinion”, in Political Science: The State of the Discipline Ed. FinifterA (American Political Science Association, Washington, DC) pp 391–401
LaaksoMTaageperaR, 1979, “Effective number of parties: A measure with applications to West Europe”Comparative Political Studies123–27
29.
LagoIMonteroJ R, 2009, “Coordination between electoral arenas in multi-level countries”European Journal of Political Research48176–203
30.
Lago-PeñasS, 2005, “Evolving federations and regional public deficits: Testing the bailout hypothesis in the Spanish case”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23437–454
31.
León-AlfonsoS, 2007The Political Economy of Fiscal Decentralization: Bringing Politics to the Study of Intergovernmental Transfers (Institut d'Estudis Autonomics, Barcelone)
32.
Lewis-BeckM S, 1986, “Comparative economic voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy”American Journal of Political Science30315–346
33.
Lewis-BeckM SStegmaierM, 2007, “Economic models of voting,”, in The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior Eds DaltonR, KlingemannH D (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 518–537
34.
McGrawK M, 1990, “Avoiding blame: An experimental investigation of political excuses and justifications”British Journal of Political Science20119–131
35.
ManzaJHoutMBroolsC, 1995, “Class voting in capitalist democracies since World War II”Annual Review of Sociology21137–162
36.
OcañaF AOñateP, 1999Análisis de Datos Electorales (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid)
37.
PapkeL EWooldridgeJ M, 1996, “Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates”Journal of Applied Econometrics11619–632
38.
PerkmannM, 2007, “Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25861–879
39.
PowellG BJr, 2000, Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
40.
PowellG BJrWhittenG D, 1993, “A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context”American Journal of Political Science37391–414
41.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN, 2003, “The global trend towards devolution and its implications”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21333–351
42.
Rodríguez-PoseASandallR, 2008, “From identity to the economy: Analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2654–72
43.
RoyedTLeydenK MBorrelliS A, 2000, “Is ‘clarity of responsibility’ important for economic voting? Revisiting Powell and Whitten's hypothesis”British Journal of Political Science30669–668
44.
RudolphT J, 2003a, “Institutional context and the assignment of political responsibility”Journal of Politics65190–215
45.
RudolphT J, 2003b, “Who's responsible for the economy? The formation and consequences of responsibility attributions”American Journal of Political Science47698–713
46.
SamuelsD, 2000, “The gubernatorial coattails effect: Federalism and congressional elections in Brazil”Journal of Politics62240–253
47.
SnidermanP M, 1993, “The new look in public opinion research”, in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II Ed. FinifterA (American Political Science Association, Washington, DC) pp 219–245
48.
Suárez-PandielloJ, 1996, “Financing local governments in Spain: New solutions to old problems”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy14411–430
49.
UrquizuI, 2008The Political Consequences of Coalition Governments: Multiparty Cabinets and Accountability (Instituto Juan March, Madrid)
50.
WeingastB R, 1995, “The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development”Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations111–31
51.
WibbelsE, 2003, “Bailouts, budget constraints, and Leviathans: Comparative federalism and lessons from the early United States”Comparative Political Studies36475–508
