The regional systems of innovation concept is well established in academic and practitioner discourses about innovation and economic development. As with the innovation systems approach more generally, the use of the concept has expanded significantly from its initial analytical purpose and has been extensively used to inform policy making. We identify a number of dangers associated with the use of regional systems of innovation as a normative concept which both overstates and at the same time underemphasises the roles regions play as policy-making and implementation spaces. These issues are explored in the paper with an illustration of the North West region of England.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminA, 1999, “An institutional perspective on regional economic development”International Journal for Urban and Regional Research23365–378.
2.
AminAThriftN, 1995, “Globalisation, institutional ‘thickness’ and the local economy”, in Managing Cities: The New Urban Context Eds HealeyPCameronSDavoudiSGrahamSMadani-PourA, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 91–108.
3.
AsheimBGertlerM, 2005, “The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems”, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Eds FagerbergJMoweryD CNelsonR R, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
4.
AsheimBIsaksenA, 2002, “Regional innovation systems: The integration of local sticky and global ubiquitous knowledge”The Journal of Technology Transfer2777–86.
5.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP, 2004, “Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”Progress in Human Geography2831–56.
BoschmaR, 2005, “Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment”Regional Studies3961–74.
8.
BreschiSMalerbaF, 1997, “Sectoral systems of innovation: Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries”, in Systems of Innovation Ed. EdquistC, (Frances Pinter, London) pp 130–156.
9.
BristowG, 2005, “Everyone's a ‘winner’: Problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness”Journal of Economic Geography5285–304.
10.
BruijnPLagendijkA, 2005, “Regional innovation systems in the Lisbon Strategy”European Planning Studies131153–1172.
11.
BunnellT GCoeN M, 2001, “Spaces and scales of innovation”Progress in Human Geography25569–589.
12.
CarlssonBJacobssonSHolménbMRickneA, 2002, “Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues”Research Policy31233–245.
13.
CookeP, 1998, “Introduction: Origin of the concept”, in Regional Innovation Systems Eds BraczykH JCookePHeinderichM, (UCL Press, London) pp 2–25.
14.
CookeP, 2001, “Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy”Industrial and Corporate Change10945–974.
15.
CookeP, 2007, “Regional innovation, entrepreneurship and talent systems”International Journal of Entrepreneur ship and Innovation Management7117–139.
16.
CookePSchienstockG, 2000, “Structural competitiveness and learning regions”Journal of Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies1265–280.
CookePBoekholtPTödtlingF, 2000The Governance of Innovation in Europe: Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness (Pinter, London).
19.
CorryDStokerG, 2002New Localism: Refashioning the Central – Local Relationship (New Local Government Network, London).
20.
DavidP, 1987, “Some new standards for the economics of standardization in the information age”, in Economic Policy and Technological Performance Eds DasguptaPStonemanP, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 206–239.
21.
DCLG, 2006State of the English CitiesDepartment of Communities and Local Government, London.
22.
DohseD, 2007, “Cluster-based technology policy: The German experience”Industry and Innovation1469–94.
23.
DoloreuxD, 2002, “What we should know about regional systems of innovation”Technology in Society24243–263.
24.
DoloreuxDPartoS, 2005, “Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues”Technology in Society27133–153.
25.
EdquistC, (Ed.), 1997Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations (Pinter, London).
26.
EdquistC, 2005, “Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges”, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Eds FagerbergJMoweryD CNelsonR R, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 181–208.
27.
EvangelistaRIammarinoSMastrostefanoVSilvaniA, 2002, “Looking for regional systems of innovation: Evidence from the Italian innovation survey”Regional Studies36173–187.
28.
FlanaganKUyarraECunninghamP, 2007, “Case study North West of England”, report for the project: Monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments, European Commission.
29.
FlanaganKUyarraELaranjaM, 2010, “The ‘policy mix’ for innovation: Rethinking innovation policy in a multi-level, multi-actor context”, WP 599, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester.
30.
FotherhillS, 2005, “A new regional policy for Britain”Regional Studies39659–667.
31.
FritschMStephanA, 2005, “Regionalization of innovation policy”Research Policy341123–1127.
32.
Fromhold-EisebithM, 2007, “Bridging scales in innovation policies: How to link regional, national and international innovation systems”European Planning Studies15217–233.
33.
GertlerM, 2003, “Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context or the undefinable tacitness of being (there)”Journal of Economic Geography375–99.
34.
HardingAMarvinSRobsonB, 2006A Framework for the City-regionsDepartment of Communities and Local Government, London.
35.
HassinkRLagendijkA, 2001, “The dilemmas of interregional institutional learning”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1965–84.
36.
HM Treasury, 2007Pre-Budget Report and Comprehensive Spending Review (The Stationery Office, London).
37.
HM Treasury, BERR, DCLG, 2007Review of Sub-national Economic Development and RegenerationHM Treasury, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, and Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
38.
HospersGSautetFDesrochersP, 2008, “Silicon somewhere: Is there a need for cluster policy?”, in Handbook of Research on Innovation and Clusters Ed. KarlssonC, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 430–446.
39.
HowellsJ, 1999, “Regional systems of innovation?”, in Innovation Policy in a Global Economy Eds ArchibugiDHowellsJMichieJ, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 67–93.
40.
IammarinoS, 2005, “An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives”European Planning Studies13495–517.
41.
KeatingM, 1998The New Regionalism in Western Europe (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
42.
LagendijkA, 2001, “Three stories about regional salience: ‘Regional Worlds’, ‘political mobilisation’ and ‘performativity”‘Zeitschrift für Wirthschaftsgeographie45139–158.
43.
LagendijkACornfordJ, 2000, “Regional institutions and knowledge: Tracking new forms of regional development policy”Geoforum31209–218.
44.
LambooyJ GBoschmaR A, 2001, “Evolutionary economics and regional policy”The Annals of Regional Science35113–131.
45.
LaranjaMUyarraEFlanaganK, 2008, “Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting”Research Policy37823–835.
46.
Lawton-SmithHTraceyPClarkG, 2003, “European policy and the regions: A review and analysis of tensions”European Planning Studies11859–873.
47.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘New Regionalism’”[International Journal for Urban and Regional Research23379–395.
48.
LundvallB A, (Ed.), 1992National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (Pinter, London).
49.
MacKinnonDCumbersAChapmanK, 2002, “Learning, innovation and regional development: A critical appraisal of recent debates”Progress in Human Geography26293–311.
50.
MacLeodG, 2001, “New regionalism reconsidered: Globalization and the remaking of political economic space”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25804–829.
51.
MajoneG, 1989Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process (Yale University Press, London).
52.
MaleckiE J, 2007, “Cities and regions competing in the global economy: Knowledge and local development policies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25638–654.
53.
MarkusenA, 2003, “Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies”Regional Studies37701–717.
54.
MaskellPMalmbergA, 1999, “Localised learning and industrial competitiveness”Cambridge Journal of Economics23167–185.
55.
MiettinenR, 2002National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric (Edita Prima, Helsinki).
56.
MoreauR, 2004, “The role of the state in evolutionary economics”Cambridge Journal of Economics28847–874.
57.
MorganK, 1997, “The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal”Regional Studies31491–503.
58.
MorganK, 2004, “Sustainable regions: Governance, innovation and scale”Journal European Planning Studies12871–889.
59.
MoulaertFSekiaF, 2003, “Territorial innovation models: A critical survey”Regional Studies37289–302.
60.
NauwelaersCReidA, 1995, “Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential”Scientometrics34497–511.
61.
NelsonR, (Ed.), 1993National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, New York).
62.
OECD, 2008Reviews of Regional Innovation: North of England, UK (OECD, Paris).
63.
OinasP, 2002, “Competition and collaboration in interconnected places: Towards a research agenda”Geografiska Annaler B8465–76.
64.
PartoS, 2005, “Economic activity and institutions: Taking stock”Journal of Economic Studies391–32.
65.
PerryB, 2007, “The multi-level governance of science policy in England”Regional Studies411051–1067.
66.
PerryBMayT, 2007, “Governance, science policy and regions: An introduction”Regional Studies411039–1050.
67.
PowerDMalmbergA, 2008, “The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: In what sense a regional problem?”Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society1233–245.
68.
RibaMLeydesdorffL, 2001, “Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a Regional Innovation System”Scientometrics50215–240.
69.
RondePHusslerC, 2005, “Innovation in regions: What does really matter?”Research Policy341150–1172.
70.
Sanz MenéndezLCruzMRomeroM, 2001, “Recursos, intereses y diffusión de modelos para la política regional de I+D: La Comunidad de Madrid”, in Sistemas Regionales de Innovación Eds OlazaranMUrangaM Gómez (Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao) pp 375–404.
71.
SharifN, 2006, “Emergence and development of the national innovation systems approach”Research Policy35745–766.
72.
StaberU, 1996, “Accounting for variations in the performance of industrial districts: The case of Baden-Wurttemberg”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20299–315.
73.
SternbergR G, 1996, “Government R&D expenditure and space: Empirical evidence from five industrialized countries”Research Policy25741–758.
74.
StorperM, 1997The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy (Guilford Press, New York).
75.
TödtlingFTripplM, 2005, “One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach”Research Policy341203–1219.
76.
UyarraE, 2010, What is evolutionary about ‘Regional Systems of Innovation’? Implications for regional policy”The Journal of Evolutionary Economics20115–137.
77.
Zabala-IturriagagoitiaJ MVoigtPGutiérrez-GraciaAJiménez-SáezF, 2007, “Regional innovation systems: How to assess performance”Regional Studies41661–672.
