The growing dissatisfaction in many countries with the performance of the public sector in delivering goods and services has focused attention on ways to improve the quality of service delivery by the public sector. ‘Privatization’ is viewed as one way to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of delivering a variety of public goods and services. In this paper the theoretical rationale, empirical evidence, and implications of utilizing the private sector to deliver government services are examined. In addition, the ‘tools-of-government-action’ idea and the challenges it poses for public management and privatization proponents are looked at. The paper is concluded by the suggestion that a serious rethinking of conventional wisdom surrounding public management be undertaken and by a review of the issues raised by these alternative arrangements in terms of the standards of efficiency, equity, accountability, and authority.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACIR, 1987The Organization of Local Public Economies (Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, DC)
2.
AllisonG T, 1982, “Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects?, in Current Issues in Public Administration Ed. LaneF S, (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 13–33
3.
AscherK, 1987The Politics of Privatisation (St Martin's Press, New York)
4.
AthertonCWindsorD, 1987, “Privatization of urban public services”, in Entrepreneurship and the Privatizing of Government Ed. WeaverC A, (Quorum Books, Westport, CT) pp 81–99
5.
BendickMLevinsonP M, 1984, “Private sector initiatives or public private partnerships”, in The Reagan Presidency and the Governing of America Eds SalamonL MLundM S, (The Urban Institute Press Washington, DC) pp 455–479
6.
BennettJ TJohnsonM J, 1980, “Tax reduction without sacrifice: Private sector production of public services”Public Finance Quarterly8363–396
7.
BorcherdingTPommerehneWSchneiderF, 1982, “Comparing the efficiency of private and public sector arrangements”Journal of Economic Theory21 (Supplement) 127–156
8.
BuchananJ MFlowersM R, 1980The Public Finances (Richard D Irwin, Homewood, IL)
9.
CarrollJ D, 1987, “Public administration in the third century of the constitution: Supply-side management, privatization, or public investment?”Public Administration Review47106–114
10.
DeHoogR H, 1984Contracting out for Human Services (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
11.
DonahueJ D, 1989The Privatization Decision (Basic Books, New York)
12.
DownsG WLarkeyP D, 1986The Search for Government Efficiency (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
13.
DunleavyP J, 1986, “Explaining the privatisation boom: Public choice versus radical approaches”Public Administration6413–34
14.
FiskDKieslingHMullerT, 1978Private Provision of Public Services (The Urban Institute, Washington, DC)
15.
GoodsellC T, 1983The Case for Bureaucracy (Chatham House, Chatham, NJ)
16.
GulickLUrwickL, (Eds), 1937Papers on the Science of Administration (Institute of Public Administration, New York)
17.
HartleT W, 1985, “Sisyphus revisited: Running the government like a business”Public Administration Review45341–351
18.
HatryH P, 1983A Review of Private Approaches for Delivery of Public Services (The Urban Institute Press, Washington DC)
19.
HatryH PVoytekK PHolmesA E, 1989Building Innovation into Program Reviews (The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC)
20.
HayesR HAbernathyW J, 1980, “Managing our way to economic decline”Harvard Business Review5867–87
21.
HecloH, 1986, “Reaganism and the search for a public philosophy”, in Perspectives on the Reagan Years Ed. PalmerJ L, (The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC) pp 31–63
22.
HenigJ R, 1989/90, “Privatization in the United States: Theory and practice”Political Science Quarterly104649–670
23.
HenryN J, 1987, “The emergence of public administration as a field of study”, in A Centennial History of the American Administrative State Ed. ChandlerR C, (The Free Press, New York) pp 37–85
24.
HirschmanA O, 1982Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
25.
KentC A, 1987, “Privatization of public functions: Promises and problems”, in Entrepreneurship and the Privatizing Government Ed. WeaverC A, (Quorum Books, Westport, CT) pp 3–22
26.
KettlD F, 1988Government by Proxy: (Mis?) Managing Federal Programs (Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC)
27.
KirlinJ J, 1984, “A political perspective”, in Public Sector Performance Ed. MillerT C, (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 161–192
28.
KolderieT, 1984, “Business opportunities in the changing conceptions of the public sector role”, in Public–Private Partnership: New Opportunities for Meeting Social Needs Ed. BrooksH, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 89–110
29.
KolderieT, 1986, “The two different concepts of privatization”Public Administration Review46285–291
30.
LeonardH B, 1986Checks Unbalanced: The Quiet Side of Public Spending (Basic Books, New York)
31.
LovikL W, 1987, “Bureaucracy, privatization, and the supply of public goods”, in Entrepreneurship and the Privatizing of Government Ed. WeaverC A, (Quorum Books, Westport, CT) pp 23–34
32.
LynnL E, 1981Managing the Public's Business (Basic Books, New York)
33.
McCrawT K, 1984, “The public and private spheres in historical perspective”, in Public–Private Partnership: New Opportunities for Meeting Social Needs Ed. BrooksH, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 31–60
34.
MeadL M, 1985, “Policy studies and political science”Policy Studies Review5319–335
35.
MoeR C, 1987, “Exploring the limits of privatization”Public Administration Review47453–459
36.
MosherF C, 1982, “The changing responsibilities and tactics of the federal government”, in American Public Administration: Patterns of the Past Ed. FeslerJ W, (American Society for Public Administration, Washington, DC) pp 198–212
37.
NiskanenW A, 1971Bureaucracy and Representative Government (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL)
38.
OECD, 1987Managing and Financing Urban ServicesOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, Paris)
39.
OstromV, 1974The Intellectual Crisis in Public Administration (University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL)
40.
OstromVOstromE, 1972, “Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration”Public Administration Review32203–216
41.
OstromVOstromE, 1977, “Public goods and public choices”, in Alternatives for Delivering Public Services Ed. SavasE S, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 7–49
42.
PackJ R, 1989, “Privatization and cost reduction”Policy Sciences221–25
43.
PalmerJ LSawhillI V, 1984, “Overview”, in The Reagan Record Eds PalmerJ LSawhillI V, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 1–30
44.
PooleR WFixlerP E, 1987, “Privatization of public-sector services in practice: Experience and potential”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management6613–625
45.
QuickP D, 1984, “Businesses: Reagan's industrial policy”, in The Reagan Record Eds PalmerJ LSawhillI V, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 287–316
46.
RaineyH GBackoffR WLevineC H, 1976, “Comparing public and private organizations”Public Administration Review36233–244
47.
RhoadsS E, 1985The Economist's View of the World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
48.
SalamonL M, 1981, “Rethinking public management”Public Policy29255–275
49.
SalamonL M, 1989, “The changing tools of government action: An overview”, in Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action Ed. SalamonL M, (The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC) pp 3–22
50.
SappingtonD EStiglitzJ E, 1987, “Privatization, information, and incentives”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management6567–582
51.
SavasE S, 1982Privatizing the Public Sector (Chatham House, Chatham, NJ)
52.
SavasE S, 1987Privatization: The Key to Better Government (Chatham House, Chatham, NJ)
53.
SayreW, 1958, “Premises of public administration: Past and emerging”Public Administration Review18103–106
54.
SchlesingerA M, 1986The Cycles of American History (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA)
55.
SchultzeC, 1977The Public Use of Private Interest (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
56.
ScottB R, 1982, “Can industry survive the welfare state?”Harvard Business Review6070–84
57.
SeidmanH, 1980Politics, Position, and Power (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
58.
SimonH A, 1976Administrative Behavior (The Free Press, New York)
59.
SmithB L R, 1971, “Accountability and independence in the contract state”, in The Dilemma of Accountability in Modern Government Eds SmithB L RHagueD C, (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 3–69
60.
SpannR M, 1977, “Public versus private provision of governmental services”, in Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth Ed. BorcherdingT E, (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 71–89
61.
StaatsE B, 1982, “Governmental performance in perspective: Achievements and challenges”, in Improving the Accountability and Performance of Government Eds SmithBCarrollJ D, (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) pp 19–34
62.
StarrP, 1989, “The meaning of privatization”, in Privatization and the Welfare State Eds KamermanS BKahnA J, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), pp 15–48
63.
StraussmanJ D, 1981, “More bang for fewer bucks? Or how local governments can rediscover the potentials (and pitfalls) of the market”Public Administration Review41150–158
64.
SullivanH J, 1987, “Privatization of public services: A growing threat to constitutional rights”Public Administration Review47461–467
65.
SundquistJ L, 1984, “Privatization: No panacea for what ails government”, in Public–Private Partnership: New Opportunities for Meeting Social Needs Ed. BrooksH, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 303–318
66.
WaldoD, 1948The Administrative State (Ronald Press, New York)
67.
WilsonJ Q, 1989Bureaucracy (Basic Books, New York)
68.
WilsonL A, 1987, “Production functions and public policy: Assessing the efficiency of privately produced public goods and services”, paper prepared for the 1987 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association; copy available from L A Wilson, Center for Urban Studies, School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ 85311
69.
WilsonL A, 1988, “Rescuing politics from the economists: Privatizing the public sector”, in Market-based Public Policy Ed. HulaR C, (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 59–68
70.
WilsonW, 1941, “The study of administration”Political Science Quarterly56481–506
71.
WolfC, 1979, “A theory of nonmarket failure: Framework for implementation analysis”The Journal of Law and Economics22107–139
72.
WolfC, 1986Markets or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives (The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA)
73.
YoungP, 1987, “Privatization around the world”, in Prospects for Privatization Ed. HankeS H, (The Academy for Political Science, New York) pp 190–206
