A collaborative cross-national study involving teams from eight countries has examined how local social service officials and local politicians seek discretionary influence over targeted national grants for local social services in education and health. It is found that local need and local political orientation have little bearing on local success in obtaining discretionary concessions over rules, allocation, and reporting of such funds. On the contrary, local actors are valued for their ability to circumvent national guidelines, often with the assistance of intermediate-level officials. Administrators are rewarded for their skills in exploiting national grants for local purposes and in interpreting complex rules to fit local preferences. Politicians tend to see themselves as troubleshooters, but generally prefer not to become involved in local social assistance problems. The results show that, despite efforts to cut back social spending, an important reservoir of professional and administrative talent exists at the local level which has probably helped preserve local social services during a period of cutbacks. In more prosperous times, these same persons will be poised to revive the surge of local social spending seen in the early 1970s and thereby extend the institutional intricacy of welfare states.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrittonR BBrownR O, 1986, “Intergovernmental impacts on policy variations within states: Effects of local discretion on general assistance programs”Policy Studies Review5529–535
2.
AltJ E, 1971, “Some social and political correlates of county borough expenditures”British Journal of Political Science149–72
3.
AshfordD E, 1974, “The effects of central finance on the British local government system”British Journal of Political Science7305–322
4.
AshfordD E, 1979, “Territorial politics and equality: Decentralization and the modern state”Political Studies2771–83
5.
AshfordD E, 1982British Dogmatism and French Pragmatism: Center–Local Relations in the Welfare State (Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
6.
AshfordD E, 1984, “The structural comparison of social policy and intergovernmental politics”Policy and Politics12369–389
7.
AshfordD E, 1986The Emergence of the Welfare States (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
8.
AshfordD EKelleyE WMilnorA WRichR, 1990, “The professional manager in American local social services”, in Political Discretion: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries Ed. AshfordD, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) forthcoming
9.
BaloghB, 1988, “The social security board as a political actor”, in Federal Social Policy: The Historical Dimension Eds CritchlowDHawleyE W, (Penn State University Press, University Park, PA) pp 55–79
10.
BeveridgeW, 1948Voluntary Action (Allen and Unwin, London)
11.
BiarezS, 1987Le pouvoir local (Economica, Paris)
12.
BjurnBSwahnU, 1980, “Health policy proposals and what happened to them: Sampling the twentieth century record”, in The Shaping of the Swedish Health System Eds HeidenheimerAElvanderN, (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent) pp 75–98
13.
BoadenN, 1977Urban Policymaking (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
14.
BogasonP, 1987, “Capacity for welfare: Local governments in Scandinavia and the United States”Scandinavian Studies8184–202
15.
BoyneG A, 1984, “Output disaggregation and the quest for the impact of local politics”Political Studies32451–458
16.
CampbellD T, 1984, “Can we be scientific in applied social sciences”Evaluation Review Studies Annual926–48
17.
CockburnC, 1977The Local State (Pluto Press, London)
18.
DahlR A, 1961Who Governs? (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
19.
DaviesB, 1968Social Needs and Resources (Michael Joseph, London)
20.
DenteB, 1990, “Partisan politics and bureaucracy in Italian local social politics”, in Political Discretion: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries Ed. AshfordD, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) forthcoming
21.
DerthickM, 1970The Influence of Federal Grants: Public Assistance in Massachusetts (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
22.
DuranPHeraultB, 1990, “Social policy and centralization in France”, in Political Discretion: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries Ed. AshfordD, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) forthcoming
23.
EvansD J, 1986, “Federalism and welfare reform”Intergovernmental Perspective129–11
24.
EversAWollmanH, 1986, “Bity city politics—new patterns and orientations at the local level on the welfare state”, in The Future of the Metropolis Eds EwersH JGoddardJ B, (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin) pp 437–462
25.
GontcharoffG, 1985La décentralisation: L'action sanitaire et sociale (Syros, Paris)
26.
GraebnerW, 1980A History of Retirement: The Meaning and Function of an American Institution, 1885–1978 (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
27.
GyfordJ, 1985The Politics of Local Socialism (Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
28.
HentiläS, 1978, “The origins of the folkhem ideology in Swedish Social Democracy”Scandinavian Journal of History3323–345
29.
HjernB, 1990, “The Swedish social welfare municipality”, in Political Discretion: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries Ed. AshfordD, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) forthcoming
30.
HjernBHullC, 1982, “Implementation research as empirical constitutionalism”European Journal of Political Research10105–116
31.
IkenberryJ, 1986, “The irony of state strengths: Comparative responses to the oil shocks in the 1970s”International Organization40105–137
32.
JaedickeWRuhlandKWollmanH, 1990, “Regulating local social assistance in Germany: Does local direction matter?”, in Political Discretion: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries Ed. AshfordD, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) forthcoming
33.
KelmanS, 1981Regulating America, Regulating Sweden (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
34.
KnoepfelPPelliC, 1990, “The allocation of local social benefits in Switzerland”, in Political Discretion: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries Ed. AshfordD, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) forthcoming
35.
LampmanR J, 1984Social Welfare Spending: Accounting for Changes from 1950 to 1978 (Academic Press, Orlando, FL)
36.
LazinF A, 1990, “The role of mayors in Israeli social policymaking: The Community Renewal Project”, in Political Discretion: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries Ed. AshfordD, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) forthcoming
37.
LeibfriedS, 1986, “Welfare guidelines in the 1920s: Regulating Weimar's poor”, in Nationalizing Social Security Eds AshfordDKelleyE W, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp 137–154
38.
MuramatsuMNakamuraA, 1990, “Myth and reality in local social policy implementation in Japan”, in Political Discretion: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries Ed. AshfordD, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) forthcoming
39.
O'ConnorJ, 1973The Fiscal Crisis of the State (St Martin's Press, New York)
40.
PattersonJ T, 1969The New Deal and the States: Federalism in Transition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
41.
PressmanJWildavskyA, 1973Implementation (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
42.
ReissertB, 1980, “Effects of federal and state grants on local government investment expenditures in West Germany”, in National Resources and Urban Policy Ed. AshfordD, (Methuen, Andover, Hants) pp 143–161
43.
RoseD D, 1973, “National and local forces in state politics: The implications of multi-level policy analysis”American Political Science Review671162–1173
44.
SabatierP, 1986, “Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research”Journal of Public Policy621–48
45.
SalamonL, 1987, “Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government–nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state”Journal of Voluntary Action Research pp 29–49
46.
StearnsP N, 1976Old Age in European Society (Holmes and Meier, New York)
47.
SteinB, 1986, “Funding social security on a current basis”, in Nationalizing Social Security in Europe and America Eds AshfordDKelleyE W, (Methuen, Andover, Hants) pp 105–126
48.
StephensR G, 1975, “State centralization and the erosion of local autonomy”Journal of Politics3652–66
49.
StoneD, 1984The Disabled State (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
50.
StonecashJ M, 1975, “Paths of fiscal centralization in the American states”Policy Studies Journal13653–661
51.
ThoenigJ-C, 1980, “Local subsidies in the Third Republic: The political marketplace and bureaucratic allocation”, in Financing Urban Government in the Welfare State Ed. AshfordD, (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent) pp 119–141
52.
ThurowL, 1975Generating Inequality (Basic Books, New York)
53.
TieboutC M, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditure”Journal of Political Economy6416–24
54.
WebbAWistowG, 1983, “Structuring local policy environments: Central–local relations in the personal social services”, mimeo, Department of Social Administration, University of Loughborough, Loughborough
55.
WierMOrloffA SSkocpolT, 1988The Politics of Social Policy in the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
56.
WilenskyH, 1975The Welfare State and Equality (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
