Successive UK governments have introduced a range of policy initiatives designed to encourage more women to start new firms. Underpinning these policies has been an explicit ambition for the UK to achieve similar participation rates as those in the US where it is widely reported that women own nearly half the stock of businesses. The data underlying these objectives are critically evaluated and it is argued that the definitions and measures of female enterprise used in the UK and the US restrict meaningful comparisons between the two. It is suggested that the expansion of female entrepreneurship in the US is historically and culturally specific to that country. UK policy goals should reflect the national socioeconomic context, while drawing upon good practice examples from a range of other countries. The paper concludes by discussing the economic and social viability of encouraging more women in the UK to enter self-employment without fully recognising the intensely competitive sectors in which they are often located.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcsZ J (Ed.), 1999Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact (Kluwer, Norwell, MA)
2.
AhlH, 2002The Making of the Female Entrepreneur: A Discourse Analysis of Research Texts on Women's Entrepreneurship PhD Dissertation Series No. 15, Jönköping International Business School, PO Box 1026, SE-551 11, Jönköping
3.
AhlH, 2006, “Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30595–622
4.
AudretschD, 1999, “Small firms and efficiency”, in Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact Ed. AcsZ J (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) pp 21–38
5.
BainesSWheelockJGelderU, 2003Riding the Rollercoaster: Family Life and Self-employment (Polity Press, Cambridge)
6.
BelleALa ValleI, 2003Combining Self-employment and Family Life (Polity Press, Cambridge)
7.
BemS, 1993The Lens of Gender (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
8.
BirleyS, 1989, “Female entrepreneurs: Are they really any different?”Journal of Small Business Management277–31
9.
BondMKerseyD, 2002, “Expanding childminding provision in areas of deprivation”Local Economy17303–312
10.
BostonT (Ed.), 1996A Different Vision: Race and Public Policy. Volume 2. African American Economic Thought (Routledge, London)
11.
BousheyHGundersenBBrochtCBernsteinJ, 2001, “Hardships in America: the real story of working families”, Economic Policy Institute, 1333 H Street, NW, Suite 300, East Tower, Washington, DC
12.
BradleyHEricksonMStephensonCWilliamsS (Eds), 2000Myths at Work (Polity Press, Cambridge)
13.
BrooksbankD, 2000, “Self-employment and small firms”, in Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy Eds CarterSJones-EvansD (FT Prentice Hall, Harlow, Essex) pp 7–31
14.
BrushC GHisrichR D, 1999, “Women-owned businesses: Why do they matter”, in Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact Ed. AcsZ J (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) pp 111–127
BrushCCarterNGatewoodE JGreenePHartM, 2006bGrowth Oriented Women Entrepreneurs and Their Businesses (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
17.
CaizzaAShawAWerschkulM, 2004, “The status of women in the United States”, Institute for Women's Policy Research, 1707 L Street, NW, Suite 750, Washington, DC 20036
18.
CarterS, 1993, “Female business ownership: Current research and possibilities for the future”, in Women in Business: Perspectives on Women Entrepreneurs Eds AllenSTrumanC (Routledge, London) pp 148–160
19.
CarterSBennettD, 2006, “Gender and entrepreneurship”, in Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy Eds CarterSJones-EvansD (FT Prentice Hall, Harlow, Essex) pp 176–191
20.
CarterSShawE, 2006, “Women's business ownership: recent research and policy developments”, report, to the Small Business Service, London, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file38330.pdf
21.
CarterSAndersonSShawE, 2001, “Women's business ownership: a review of the academic, popular and internet literature”, report to the Small Business Service, London, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file38362.pdf
22.
CharlesM, 2003, “Deciphering sex segregation: Vertical and horizontal inequalities in ten national labour markets”Acta Sociologica46267–287
23.
ColliARoseM B, 2003, “Family firms in comparative perspective”, in Business History Around the World Eds JonesGAmorettiF (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 168–177
24.
ColliAFernandezP PRoseM B, 2003, “National determinants of family firm development? Family firms in Britain, Spain, and Italy in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries”Enterprise and Society428–64
25.
CollinsHMooreM G, 1964Enterprising Man (Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MI)
CromptonRLyonetteC, 2006, “Some issues in cross-national comparative research methods: A Comparison of attitudes to promotion, and women's employment, in Britain and Portugal”Work, Employment and Society20403–414
28.
CWBR, 2004, “Capturing the impact: women-owned businesses in the United States”, Center for Women's Business Research, 1411 K Street, NW, Suite 1350, Washington, DC 20005
29.
CWBR, 2005, “Top facts about women-owned businesses”, Center for Women's Business Research, 1411 K Street, NW, Suite 1350, Washington, DC 20005
30.
DalyMRakeK, 2003Gender and The Welfare State: Care, Work and Welfare in Europe and the USA (Blackwell, Oxford)
31.
de BeauvoirS, 1972The Second Sex translation by PashleyH M (Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middx)
32.
Epsing-AndersonG, 1999Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
HakimC, 1989, “Identifying fast growth small firms”Employment Gazette (January) 29–41
35.
HamiltonE, 2006, “Whose story is it anyway? Narrative accounts of the role of women in founding and establishing family businesses”International Small Business Journal24(3) 253–271
36.
HippleS, 2004, “Self-employment in the United States: An update”Monthly Labor Review (July) 13–23
37.
HolmquistESundinC, 1989, “‘The growth of women's entrepreneurship—push or pull factors?”, paper presented to the European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Conference on Small Business, University of Durham Business School, available from http://www.EIASM.be
38.
IWPR, 2003, “Single mothers and their children suffered most last year with persistently high poverty”, press release, 26 September, Institute for Women's Policy Research, Washington, DC, http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/PovertyNumbers.pdf
39.
JacobsenJ P, 1998The Economics of Gender2nd edition (Blackwell, Oxford)
40.
JurikN, 2005Bootstrap Dreams (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
41.
KellardKMiddletonS, 1998, “Helping unemployed people into self-employment”, RP 46, Department for Education and Employment, London, available from http://www.delni.gov.uk/index/statistics/research
42.
Labour Force Survey, 1992, “Labour force survey quarterly survey”, April, Office for National Statistics, 1 Drummond Gate, London SW1V 2QQ
43.
Labour Force Survey, 2005/06, “Labour force survey quarterly survey”, April, Office for National Statistics, 1 Drummond Gate, London SW1V 2QQ
MarlowSWatsonEWestallA, 2003, “Who benefits?”, New Economics Foundation, London
51.
MeadM, 1949Male and Female (Morrow Quill, New York)
52.
MinittiMAreniusPLangowitzN, 2005, “Global entrepreneurship monitor 2004 report on women and entrepreneurship”, Babson College, Babson Park, MA
53.
MirchandaniK, 1999, “Feminist insight on gendered work: New directions in research on women and entrepreneurship”Gender, Work and Organisation6224–236
54.
MirchandaniK, 2005, “Women's entrepreneurship: Exploring new avenues”, in International Handbook of Women and Small Business Entrepreneurship Eds FieldenSDavidsonM (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 202–220
55.
NWBC, 2004, “Women business owners and their enterprises”, National Women's Business Council, 409 Third Street, SW, Suite 210, Washington, DC 20024
56.
OakleyA, 1973Sex, Gender and Society (Temple Smith, London)
57.
O'ConnorJ SOrloffA SShaverS, 1999States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
58.
OECD, 2003Women's Entrepreneurship: Issues and Policies Working Party on Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and Entrepreneurship (OECD, Paris)
59.
OECD, 2005OECD Factbook 2005: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics (OECD, Paris)
60.
OgborJ O, 2000, “Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology critique of entrepreneurial studies”Journal of Management Studies35605–635
61.
O'ReillyJ, 2006, “Framing comparisons: Gendering perspectives on cross-national comparative research on work and welfare”Work, Employment and Society20731–750
62.
OrloffA S, 2003, “Markets not states? The weakness of state social provision for breadwinning men in the U.S.”, in Families of a New World Eds HaneyLPollardL (Routledge, New York) pp 217–245
63.
ParkerS, 2004The Economics of Self-employment and Entrepreneurship (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
RaiS M, 2003, Mainstreaming Gender: Democratizing the State? Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
67.
RosaPCarterSHamiltonD, 1996, “Gender as a determinant of small business performance: Insights from a British study”Small Business Economics8463–478
68.
RouseJ, 2005, “Pregnancy and maternity in self-employment: individualised social reproduction?”, paper presented at the 28th Institute for Small Business Entrepreneurship National Conference, Blackpool, November, available from http://www.lsbe.org.uk
69.
RouseJKitchingJ, 2006, “Do enterprise support programmes leave women holding the baby?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy245–19
70.
SBA, 2006, “Women in business: a demographic review of women's business ownership”, Small Business Administration, available at http://www.sba.gov/advo/
71.
ScaseR, 1995, “Employment relations in small firms”, in Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice in Britain Ed. EdwardsP (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 470–489
72.
ScaseR, 2000, “The enterprise culture: The socio-economic context of small firms”, in Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy Eds CarterSJones-EvansD (FT Prentice Hall, Harlow, Essex) pp 32–47
73.
SchreierJ, 1973The Female Entrepreneur: A Pilot Study (Center for Venture Management, Milwaukee, WI)
74.
SchwartzE B, 1976, “Entrepreneurship: A New female frontier”Journal of Contemporary Business (Winter) 47–76
75.
SegalL, 1989Is the Future Female? Troubled Thoughts on Contemporary Feminism (Virago, London)
76.
ShakeshaftCNowellI, 1984, “Research on themes, concepts and models of organisational behaviour: The influence of gender”Issues in Education2186–203
77.
SkrentnyJ D (Ed.), 2001Color Lines: Affirmative Action, Immigration, and Civil Rights Options for America (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
ThomasS, 1997, “Women, welfare, reform and the presentation of a myth”The Social Science Journal34352–368
81.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2005, “Unincorporated self-employed persons in nonagricultural industries by sex, 1976–2002 annual averages”, http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf.table32.pdf
82.
US Census Bureau, 2002, “Historical income tables—full time, year round workers by median income and sex: 1955 to 2001”, available at http://www.census.gov
83.
US House of Representatives, 1964Civil Rights Act H.R.7152 88th Congress
84.
US House of Representatives, 1988Women's Business Ownership Act H.R.5050 100th Congress
85.
US House of Representatives, 1996Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act H.R.3734 104th Congress
86.
WatsonJRobinsonS, 2003, “Adjusting for risk in comparing the performance of male and female controlled SMEs”Journal of Business Venturing18773–788
87.
WestCZimmermanD, 1987, “Doing gender”Gender and Society1(1) 125–152
88.
WilsonLWhittamGDeakinsD, 2004, “Women's enterprise: A Critical examination of national policies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22799–815
