We explore the determinants of a household's choice to participate in rural water-supply projects in the Cuzco Department of Peru. Using survey data collected from over 1500 households in 99 villages, we present fixed-effects and random-effects models that explain a household's decision to participate in two ways—through meeting attendance and through involvement in decision making. We find that income and wealth impact the decision to participate in different ways. Households with more wealth, measured by ownership of assets, were more likely to attend meetings but were less likely to have a voice in decision making. In terms of income, we find that middle-class households had more input into decision making than lower-income households. Household-level measures of social capital positively affected participation both in terms of attending meetings and in the number of decisions in which households were involved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalandJ MPlatteauJ-P, 1996Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
2.
BeardV A, 2005, “Individual determinants of participation in community development in Indonesia”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2321–39
3.
ColcloughGSitaramanB, 2005, “Community and social capital: What is the difference?”Sociological Quarterly75474–496
4.
CookeBKothariU, (Eds), 2001Participation: The New Tyranny (Zed Books, New York)
5.
DrinotP, 2006, “Nation-building, racism and inequality: Institutional development in Peru in historical perspective”, in Making Institutions Work in Peru Ed. CrabtreeJ, (Institute for the Study of the Americas, London) pp 5–23
6.
EgurenF, 2006, “Agrarian policy, institutional change and new actors in Peruvian agriculture”, in Making Institutions Work in Peru Ed. CrabtreeJ, (Institute for the Study of the Americas, London) pp 113–135
7.
EngelSIskandaraniMdel Pilar UsecheM, 2005, “Improved water supply in the Ghanaian Volta Basin: Who uses it and who participates in community decision-making?”, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, http://ifpri.org/divs/eptd/dp/papers/eptdp129.pdf
8.
FilmerDPritchettL H, 2001, “Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India”Demography38115–132
9.
GellesP H, 2000Water and Power in Highland Peru: The Cultural Politics of Irrigation and Development (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ)
10.
GittellRVidalA, 1998Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy (Sage, Newbury Park, CA)
IshamJKahkonenS, 2002a, “Institutional determinants of the impact of community-based water services: Evidence from Sri Lanka and India”Economic Development and Cultural Change50667–691
13.
IshamJKahkonenS, 2002b, “How do participation and social capital affect community-based water projects? Evidence from Central Java, Indonesia”, in The Role of Social Capital in Development: An Empirical Assessment Eds GrootaertCvan BastelaerT, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 155–187
14.
KrishnaA, 2004, “Understanding, measuring and utilizing social capital: Clarifying concepts and presenting a field application from India”Agricultural Systems82291–305
15.
LinN, 2002, Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (Cambridge University Press, New York)
16.
MansuriGRaoV, 2004, “Community-based and -driven development: A critical review”The World Bank Research Observer191–39
17.
MorrisSCarlettoCHoddinottJChristiaensenL J M, 1999, “Validity of rapid estimates of household wealth and income for health surveys in rural Africa”Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54381–387
OliverM LShapiroT M, 1997Black Wealth/White Wealth (Routledge, New York)
20.
OlsonM, 1965The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge)
21.
OPS, 2000, “Evaluatión global de los servicios de agua y saneamiento—2000. Informe analitico” [Global evaluation of water and sanitation services—2000. Informal report], Organization Panamerica de la Salud/Oficina Regional de la Organization Mundial de la Salud, Lima
22.
PlatteauJ-P, 2004, “Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development”Development and Change35223–246
23.
ProkopyL S, 2004, “Women's participation in rural water supply projects in India: Is it moving beyond tokenism and does it matter?”Water Policy6103–116
24.
ProkopyL S, 2005, “The relationship between participation and project outcomes: Evidence from rural water supply projects in India”World Development331801–1819
25.
ProkopyL S, in press, “Determinants and benefits of household level participation in rural drinking water projects in India”Journal of Development Studies
26.
ProkopyL SThorstenRBakalianAWakemanW, 2008, “Evaluating the role of postconstruction support in sustaining drinking water projects: Evidence from Peru”Journal of Planning Education and Research27294–305
27.
PutnamR D, 1995, “Bowling alone: America's declining social capital”Journal of Democracy665–78
28.
PutnamR D, 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York)
29.
RydinYHolmanN, 2004, “Reevaluating the contribution of social capital in achieving sustainable development”Local Environment9117–133
30.
SaraJKatzT, 1998, “Making rural water supply sustainable: Report on the impact of project rules”, The World Bank, Washington, DC
31.
SenA, 1999, Development as Freedom (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
TamayoGBarrantesRConternoEBustamanteA, 1999, “Reform efforts and low-level equilibrium in the Peruvian water sector”, in Spilled Water: Institutional Commitment in the Provision of Water Services Eds SavedoffW DSpillerP T, (Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC) pp 89–134
33.
TrawickP B, 2003The Struggle for Water in Peru: Comedy and Tragedy in the Andean Commons (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
WhiteleyP F, 2000, “Economic growth and social capital”Political Studies48443–466
36.
WhittingtonDDavisJMcClellandE, 1998, “Implementing a demand-driven approach to community water supply planning: A case study of Lugazi, Uganda”Water International23134–145
37.
WiebeA, 2000, “Who participates? Determinants of participation in a community development project in Guatemala”Canadian Journal of Development Studies21579–604
World Bank Water Demand Research Team, 1993, “The demand for water in rural areas: Determinants and policy implications”World Bank Research Observer847–70
40.
YoungersC A, 2006, “Promoting human rights: NGOs and the State in Peru”, in Making Institutions Work in Peru Ed. CrabtreeJ, (Institute for the Study of the Americas, London) pp 158–184
