The properties of a country's system of intergovernmental grants may have important effects on the vulnerability of local government to socioeconomic changes and to changes in grants from the central government. A comparison between Denmark and the United States suggests that a combination of a low degree of equalization, high reliance on general grants, and a visible structure of taxation lead to a high degree of vulnerability to fiscal stress.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CB, 1982–87Statistiske Efterretninger, Kommunale budgetter og regnskaberCensus Bureau of Denmark, Copenhagen
2.
ClarkTNFergusonLC, 1983City Money: Political Processes, Fiscal Stress, and Retrenchment (Columbia University Press, New York, NY)
3.
DommelPR, 1974The Politics of Revenue Sharing (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN)
4.
MouritzenPENarverBJ, 1986, “Fiscal stress in local government: The Danish and American cases”, in Research in Urban Policy, volume 2 Ed. ClarkTN, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp 197–218
5.
MouritzenPENielsenKH, 1988Handbook of Comparative Urban Fiscal Data Danish Data Archives, University of Odense, Odense
6.
NathanRP, 1983, “State and local governments under federal grants”Political Science Quarterly9847–57
7.
NathanRPDoolittleFC, 1983The Consequences of Cuts: The Effects of the Reagan Domestic Program on State and Local Government (Urban and Regional Research Center, Princeton, NJ)
8.
NathanRPDoolittleFC, and Associates, 1987Reagan and the States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
9.
OMB, 1982Budget of the United States Government Special Analysis HOffice of Management and Budget
10.
PetersonGE, 1986, “Urban policy and the cyclical behavior of cities”, in Reagan and the Cities Eds PetersonGELewisCW, (The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC) pp 11–35
11.
USDC, 1987Government Finances in 1977US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
12.
WolmanHADavisB, 1980, “Local government strategies to cope with fiscal pressure”, in Sage Yearbooks in Politics and Public Policy, Volume 9: Fiscal Stress and Public Policy Eds LevinCHRubinI, (Sage, London) pp 231–248