In April 1987 the United Kingdom took an important step towards the ‘integrated’ or ‘cross-media’ approach to pollution-control with the creation of Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Pollution (HMIP). Significant legislative change is now proposed which will put HMIP on a statutory footing and enable it to take an integrated approach to the control of more serious problems of pollution, considering the impact on the environment as a whole. Integrated polution-control has been claimed to offer environmental and administrative advantages over a sectoral system, but these remain to be demonstrated in practice and some important conceptual, methodological, and institutional issues remain to be resolved as HMIP embarks upon implementation of the new approach. Political commitment to pollution-control, reflected in the availability of adequate resources, will be essential if real progress is to be made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarbourAK, 1985, “Waste disposal—what is the best environmental option?”, mimeograph; available from Confederation of British Industry, Centre Point, New Oxford Street, London WC1, England
2.
BennettGvon MoltkeK, 1988, “Integrated permitting in the Netherlands and the Federal Republic of Germany”, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) and Conservation Foundation, joint project on Integrated Pollution Control in Europe and North America; available from IEEP, 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1, England
3.
CEC, 1987Official Journal number c328, 7 December, Commission of the European Communities, 8 Storey's Gate, London SW1, England
4.
CBI, 1986, “Best practiable environmental option”, Confederation of British Industry comments to Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, T 411 86; copy available from CBI, Centre Point, New Oxford Street, London WC1, England
5.
CBI, 1987, “Best practicable environmental option”, Confederation of British Industry comments on questions posed to control authorities by Royal Commision on Environmental Pollution, T 145 87; copy available from CBI, Centre Point, New Oxford Street, London WC1, England
6.
DoE, 1982, “Air pollution control”, pollution paper 18, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
7.
DoE, 1986a, “Air pollution control in Great Britain: Review and proposals. A consultation paper”, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
8.
DoE, 1986b, “Inspecting industry: Pollution to safety. Action plan”, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
9.
DoE, 1987, “The National Rivers Authority: The government's policy for a public regulatory body in a privatised water industry”, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
10.
DoE, 1988a, “Integrated pollution control: A consultation paper”, copy available from Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1, England
11.
DoE, 1988b, “Environmental assessment”, circular 15/88; copy available from Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1, England
12.
DoE, 1988c, “Inputs of dangerous substances to water: Proposals for a unified system of control”; copy available from Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1, England
13.
ENDS, 1987, “New inspectorate outlines plans for implementing best environmental option”, report number 148, May, page 8; available from Environmental Data Services Ltd, Unit 24, Finsbury Business Centre, 40 Bowling Green Lane, London Ec1R ONE, England
14.
ENDS, 1988, “Integrated pollution control and the Red List”, report number 162, July, pages 15–17, available from Environmental Data Services Ltd, Unit 24, Finsbury Business Centre, 40 Bowling Green Lane, London EC1R ONE, England
15.
GuruswamyLDTromansSR, 1986, “Towards an integrated approach to pollution control”Journal of Planning and Environment Law13 September, 643–655
16.
HaighN, 1984EEC Environmental Policy and Britain: An Essay and a Handbook (Environmental Data Services, Unit 24, 40 Bowling Green Lane, London, EC1, England)
17.
HawkinsRGP, 1987, “Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Pollution”, in Best Practicable Environmental Option—a New Jerusalem ? Ed. TromansS R, report by a working group of the United Kingdom Environmental Law Association, pp 19–37
18.
HMSO, 1986Inspecting Industry: Pollution and Safety efficiency scrutiny report commissioned by Secretaries of State for Environment and Employment (HMSO, London)
19.
LaurenceDSWynneB, 1986, “Best practicable environmental option”, evidence given to the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Centre for Science Policy and Science Studies, University of Lancaster, Bailrigg, Lancaster, England
20.
OwensSE, 1988, “The Unified Pollution Inspectorate and ‘best practicable environmental option’ in the United Kingdom”, case study 4, joint project on “Integrated Pollution Control in Europe and North America”, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) and Conservation Foundation; copy available from IEEP, 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1, England
21.
PerrimanRJ, 1987, “The Pollution Inspectorate's prospectus”, paper presented at a conference, “Finding the Best Practicable Environmental Option”, Institute of Wastes Management, London, May; copy available from Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1, England
22.
RabeBG, 1986Fragmentation and Integration in State Environmental Management (The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC)
23.
RCEP, 1976, “Air pollution control: An integrated approach”, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, fifth report, command 6371 (HMSO, London)
24.
RCEP, 1984, “Tackling pollution: Experience and prospects”, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, tenth report, command 9149 (HMSO, London)
25.
RCEP, 1985, “Managing waste: The duty of care”, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, eleventh report, command 9675 (HMSO, London)
26.
RCEP, 1988Best Practicable Environmental Option Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (HMSO, London)
27.
TromansSR, 1987, “Land use planning and BPEO”, in Best Practicable Environmental Option—a New Jerusalem ? Ed. TromansS R, report by a working group of the United Kingdom Environmental Law Association, pp 105–125
28.
WoodC, 1988, “EIA and BPEO: Acronyms for good environmental planning?”Journal of Planning and Environment Law15 May, 310–321
