The authors explore the determinants of firm location in a polycentric city with the aid of data for the Houston region. Firm location is modeled in a discrete-choice framework, with eight employment centers and outlying areas used as possible choices. Agglomerative and dispersive forces are explicitly treated, as are taxes and other characteristics that vary over space. The findings suggest that property taxes have large deterrent effects on firm locations for the four industrial groups analyzed here: oil and gas; manufacturing; finance, insurance and real estate (FIRE); and services. When agglomeration economies are present, they are weaker than the tax effects and are positive for only the FIRE and services industrial groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartikT J, 1991Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?W E Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI
2.
CharneyA, 1983, “Intraurban manufacturing location decisions and local tax differentials”Journal of Urban Economics14184–205
3.
CraigS GKohlhaseJ E, 2003, “Employment subcenters and the distribution of economic activity”, working paper, Economics Department, University of Houston, Houston, TX
4.
CraigS GNgP T, 2001, “Using quantile smoothing splines to identify employment subcenters in a multicentric urban area”Journal of Urban Economics49100–120
5.
DurantonGOvermanH G, 2002, “Testing for localisation using micro-geographic data”, working paper, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, London
6.
DurantonGPugaD, 2004, “The micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies”, in Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics. Volume 4 Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ F (Elsevier, New York) pp 2063–2118
7.
FinneyM, 1994, “Property tax effects on intrametropolitan firm location: further evidence”Applied Economic Letters129–31
8.
FoxW, 1981, “Fiscal differentials an industrial location: some empirical evidence”Urban Studies18105–111
HendersonJ V, 1986, “Efficiency of resource usage and city size”Journal of Urban Economics1947–70
11.
HendersonJ V, 2003, “Marshall's scale economies”Journal of Urban Economics531–28
12.
LongJ SFreeseJ, 2003Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX)
13.
McGuireT, 1985, “Are local property taxes important in the intrametropolitan location decisions of firms? An empirical analysis of the Minneapolis – St Paul metropolitan area”Journal of Urban Economics18226–234
14.
McHoneW, 1986, “Supply-side considerations in the location of industry in suburban communities: empirical evidence from the Philadelphia SMSA”Land Economics6264–73
15.
McMillenD P, 2001, “Nonparametric employment subcenter identification”Journal of Urban Economics50448–473
16.
McMillenD PMacDonaldJ F, 1998, “Suburban subcenters and employment density in metropolitan Chicago”Journal of Urban Economics43157–180
17.
MoomawR L, 1986, “Have changes in localization economies been responsible for declining productivity advantages in large cities?”Journal of Regional Science2619–32
18.
MoomawR L, 1998, “Agglomeration economies: are they exaggerated by industrial aggregation?”Regional Science and Urban Economics28199–212
19.
PalmonOSmithB, 1998, “New evidence on property tax capitalization”Journal of Political Economy1061009–1111
20.
QuigleyJ, 1998, “Urban diversity and economic growth”Journal of Economic Perspectives12127–138
21.
RosenthalS SStrangeW, 2003, “Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration”Review of Economics and Statistics85377–393
22.
RosenthalS SStrangeW, 2004, “Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies”, in Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics. Volume 4 Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ F (Elsevier, New York) pp 2119–2172
23.
RosenthalS SStrangeW, 2005, “The geography of entrepreneurship in the New York metropolitan area”Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review December, pages 29–53
24.
SegalD, 1976, “Are there returns to scale in city size?”Review of Economics and Statistics58339–350
25.
SeiganB H, 1972Land Use Without Zoning (D C Heath, Lexington, MA)
26.
ShuklaVWaddellP, 1991, “Firm location and land use in discrete urban space: a study of the spatial structure of Dallas – Fort Worth”Regional Science and Urban Economics21225–253
27.
SmallK ASongS, 1994, “Population and employment densities: structure and change”Journal of Urban Economics36292–313
28.
WasylenkoM, 1980a, “Evidence of fiscal differentials and intrametropolitan firm relocation”Land Economics56337–349
29.
WasylenkoM, 1980b, “The location of firms: the role of taxes and fiscal incentives”, in Urban Affairs Annual Review. Volume 20 Ed. BahlR, pp 155–190
30.
WooldridgeJ, 2002Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
