To what extent is trust in governance procedures a precondition for public engagement? This work is based on ethnographic research that examined the relationship between regulators and residents in the major chemical and petrochemical centres of Grangemouth (Scotland) and Ludwigshafen (Germany). In Grangemouth a period of rising economic insecurity coupled with intensified public concern about safety has brought regulatory authorities and the town's population into ongoing dialogue. This dialogue has been uneasy, and marked by considerable public suspicion; but it has been a dialogue of sorts, nonetheless. In Ludwigshafen the prevailing mood has remained one of confidence in the town's massive chemical industry: the notion that a routine dialogue between regulators and residents might be either necessary or desirable has rarely been articulated by either side. Questioning the tendency in the literature on public engagement in environmental policy issues to associate such engagement with trust, we suggest that, in these two case studies at least, the opposite applied. It was manifest distrust and frustration which provoked animated public engagement with government and officials in Grangemouth recently. Equally, it was the depth of trust and familiarity, built up over decades, which facilitated public disengagement from issues of environmental regulation and governance in Ludwigshafen.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanksA, 2000, “Managing risk in the chemical and nuclear industries: Policy and practice in the UK and Lithuania”, draft report, Department of Geography, University of Durham, Durham.
2.
BASF, 2001, “BASF group facts and figures: Charts 2001”, BASF AG, Ludwigshafen.
3.
BeckU, 1992Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Sage, London).
4.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 2001, “Public understandings of air pollution: The ‘localisation’ of environmental risk”Global Environmental Change11133–145.
5.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 2002, “Risk, responsibility, and blame: An analysis of vocabularies of motive in air-pollution(ing) discourses”Environment and Planning A342175–2192.
6.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 2003, “The place(s) of matter: Matter out of place—public understandings of air pollution”Progress in Human Geography2745–67.
7.
BrickmanRJasanoffSIlgenT, 1985Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).
8.
BurawoyM, 1979Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labour Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
9.
BurgessJHarrisonC MFiliusP, 1998, “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship”Environment and Planning A301445–1460.
10.
BurninghamKThrushD, 2004, “Pollution concerns in context: A comparison of local perceptions of the risks associated with living close to a road and a chemical factory”Journal of Risk Research7213–232.
11.
BushJMoffattSDunnC, 2001, “‘Even the birds round here cough’: Stigma, air pollution and health in Teesside”Health and Place747–56.
DavisH, 1979Beyond Class Images: Explorations in the Structure of Social Consciousness (Croom Helm, London).
14.
EdenS, 1998, “Environmental issues: Knowledge, uncertainty and the environment”Progress in Human Geography22425–432.
15.
GansP, 1984, “Intra-urban migration patterns in the distribution of foreign residents in Ludwigshafen/Rhine: An empirical study of housing submarkets and mobility barriers”Geographische Zeitschrift72(2) 81–98.
16.
GiddensA, 1991Modernity and Self-identity (Polity Press, Cambridge).
17.
GouldsonA, 2004, “Cooperation and the capacity for control: Regulatory styles and the evolving influence of environmental regulations in the UK”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22583–603.
18.
HalleD, 1984America's Working Man: Work, Home, and Politics Among Blue-collar Property Owners (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
19.
HarrisR, 1987Power and Powerlessness in Industry (Tavistock Publications, London).
IngoldT, 2000The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (Routledge, London).
22.
IrwinAWynneB, (Eds), 1996Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
23.
JasanoffSMartelloM L, (Eds), 2004Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
24.
JordanAWurzelR K WZitoA R, 2003, “‘New’ instruments of environmental governance: Patterns and pathways of change”Environmental Politics12(1) 1–24.
25.
OwensS, 2000, “‘Engaging the public’: Information and deliberation in environmental policy”Environment and Planning A321141–1148.
26.
PettsJ, 2004, “Barriers to participation and deliberation in risk decisions: Evidence from waste management”Journal of Risk Research7115–133.
27.
PhillimoreP, 1998, “Uncertainty, reassurance and pollution: The politics of epidemiology in Teesside”Health and Place4203–212.
28.
PhillimorePBellP, 2005, “Trust and risk in a German chemical town”Ethnos70311–334.
29.
PhillimorePMoffattS, 2004, “‘If we have wrong perceptions of our area, we cannot be surprised if others do as well’: Representing risk in Teesside's environmental politics”Journal of Risk Research7171–184.
30.
Pless-MulloliTPhillimorePMoffattSBhopalRFoyCDunnCTateJ, 1998, “Lung cancer, proximity to industry and poverty in Northeast England”Environmental Health Perspectives106189–196.
31.
PorteousR, 1994Grangemouth's Modern HistoryFalkirk District Libraries, Falkirk.
32.
ProutAHayesLGelderL, 1999, “Medicines and the maintenance of ordinariness in the household management of childhood asthma”Sociology of Health and Illness21137–162.
33.
SchlüterAPhillimoreP, 2005, “Rationalizing risk: Arguing over safety on the Firth of Forth”Focaal—European Journal of Anthropology4679–90.
34.
SchlüterAPhillimorePMoffattS, 2004, “Enough is enough: Emerging ‘self-help’ environmentalism in a petrochemical town”Environmental Politics13715–733.
35.
SimmonsP, 2004, “Performing safety in faulty environments”, in Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance Eds SzerszynskiBHeimMWatertonC, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 78–93.
36.
SpashC, 2001, “Broadening democracy in environmental policy processes”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19475–481.
37.
TeshS N, 1999, “Citizen experts in environmental risk”Policy Sciences3239–58.
38.
WalkerG, 2000, “Urban planning, hazardous installations, and blight: An evaluation of responses to hazard-development conflict”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18127–143.
39.
WurzelR K W, 2002Environmental Policy-making in Britain, Germany and the European Union: The Europeanisation of Air and Water Control (Manchester University Press, Manchester).
40.
WurzelR K WJordanAZitoA RBrücknerL, 2003, “From high regulatory state to social and ecological market economy? New environmental policy instruments in Germany”Environmental Politics12115–136.
41.
WynneB, 1996, “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert – lay knowledge divide”, in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology Eds LashSSzerszynskiBWynneB, (Sage, London) pp 44–83.
42.
ZonabendF, 1993The Nuclear Peninsula (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
