This paper contains an assessment of the impact of the Chernobyl disaster on US civilian and military nuclear programs. Specific attention is devoted to the major policy changes sought by federal nuclear regulatory agencies, the US Congress, state and local governments hosting nuclear installations, and the nuclear industry in the twelve-month period following the April 1986 accident in the Soviet Ukraine.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhearneJF, 1987, “Nuclear power after Chernobyl”Science236673–679
2.
AlbrightD, 1986, “Chernobyl and the U.S. nuclear industry”Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists4238–40
3.
AlbrightDPaineCvon HippieF, 1986, “The danger of military reactors”Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists4244–48
4.
American Men and Women of Science1986 edition (Jaques Cattrell Press, Bowker, NY)
5.
American Survey, 1987, “Sleeping on the job”The Economist 9 May, pages 26–27
6.
AsselstineJK, 1986, “Complacency on nuclear safety”Los Angeles Times 11 May, page 5
7.
Atomic Energy Act, 1954, Publ. L. No. 68-703, 68 Stat. 919–961
8.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1986a, “Historical profile of U.S. nuclear power development”BACKGROUND INFO 1 January, pages 1–20
9.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1986b, “Little technical impact seen on West from Chernobyl”INFO2131
10.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1986cMid-year Report: Will There Be Energy After Chernobyl? INFO News Release (Atomic Industrial Forum Inc, Bethesda, MD 21718)
11.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1986d, “Nuclear energy rise vital, US adivsory panel says”INFO2151–2
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1986fThe Nuclear Industry in 1986: A Year of Incongruities INFO News Release (Atomic Industrial Forum Inc, Bethesda, MD 21718)
14.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1986g, “Utility group announces plan to boost reactor performance”INFO2145
15.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1986h, “Soviets sought to manage way around Chernobyl flaws”INFO2166
16.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1987a, “Little Chernobyl impact seen on U.S. nuclear operations”INFO2181
17.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1987b, “NRC staff wins support for new emergency rule”INFO2183
18.
Atomic Industrial Forum, 1987c, “Update: Too cheap to meter?' Anatomy of a cliche”BACKGROUND INFO 1 February, pages 1–4
19.
BabbittB, 1986, “U.S. nuclear industry is backsliding”Los Angeles Times 1 May, page 5
20.
BarnesKBrosiusJCutterSMitchellJK, 1979, “Responses of impacted population to the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor accident”, DP-13, Department of Geography, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903
21.
BoffeyPM, 1987, “New plan on nuclear plants is laid to frustration”New York Times 6 February, page 1
22.
ChenaultWWHubertGDReichlinSD, 1979Evacuation Planning in the TMI Accident (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472)
23.
Chernobyl Report, 1986, “Coping with the human factor”Nature32325
24.
CollinsHEGrimesBKGalpinF, 1978Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants NUREG-0389 (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC)
25.
CookE, 1982, “The role of history in the acceptance of nuclear power”Social Science Quarterly633–15
26.
DiamondS, 1986, “How Chernobyl alters the nuclear equation: 15 US reactors are awaiting licenses”New York Times 25 May, page E1
27.
Energy Reorganization Act, 1974, Publ. L. No. 93-438, 88 Stat. 1233–1254
EriksonKT, 1982, “Human response in a radiological emergency”, in The Indian Point Book: An Investigation of the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plants (Union of Concerned Scientists, 26 Church Street, Cambridge, MA 02238; and New York Public Interest Research Group Inc, New York)
30.
FeinsteinCDBaumanDS, 1987, “Statistical analysis of nuclear plant leadtimes”Energy Systems and Policy10237–255
31.
FlynnC, 1979Three Mile Island Telephone Survey: Preliminary Report of Procedures and Findings NUREG/CR-1093 (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC)
32.
FranklinBA, 1987a, “Hearing to focus on reactor plan”New York Times 21 February, page 25
33.
FranklinBA, 1987b, “Nuclear agency moves to ease reactor rules”New York Times 27 February, page 5
34.
FranklinBA, 1987c, “Officials deride proposal on nuclear evacuations”New York Times 25 February, page A14
35.
HardingJ, 1983, “$25 million in ads to save nuclear power”Not Man Apart November issue, pages 18–19
36.
HohenemserCKaspersonREKatesRW, 1977, “The distrust of nuclear power”Science19625–34
37.
HohenemserCKaspersonREKatesRW, 1985, “Nuclear power”, in Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology Eds KatesRWHohenemserCKaspersonJX, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 219–250
38.
JohnsonJHJr, 1984, “Planning for spontaneous evacuation during a radiological emergency”Nuclear Safety25186–194
39.
JohnsonJHJr, 1985, “Planning for nuclear power plant accidents: Some neglected spatial and behavioral considerations”, in Geographical Dimensions of Energy Eds CalzonettiFJSolomonBD, (D Reidel, Dordrecht) pp 123–154
40.
JohnsonJHJrZeiglerDJ, 1983, “Distinguishing human responses to radiological emergencies”Economic Geography59386–402
41.
KemenyJG, 1979Report of the President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
42.
LiftonRJ, 1982, “Beyond psychic numbing: A call to awareness”American Journal of Orthopsychiatry52619–629
43.
MarbachWD, 1987, “America's big risk”Newsweek 27 April, pages 58–59
44.
MarshallE, 1987, “How safe Savannah River reactors”Science2351563–1564
45.
MelberBD, 1983, “The impact of TMI upon the public acceptance of nuclear power”Progress in Nuclear Energy10387–398
46.
MelberBDNealeySMHammerslaJRanklinWL, 1977Nuclear Power and the Public: Analysis of Collected Survey Research (Battelle Human Affairs Research Center, 4000 NE 41st Street, Seattle, WA 98105)
47.
MitchellRC, 1982, “Public response to a major failure of a controversial technology”, in Accident at Three Mile Island Eds SillsDLWolfCPShelanskiVB, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 21–38
48.
NIRS, 1986, “The aftermath of Chernobyl”Groundswell91–9 (Nuclear Information and Resource Service, 1616 P Street, NW, Suite 160, Washington, DC 20036)
49.
NIRS, 1987, “Emergency planning alert”NIRS Alert February/March issue, page 4 (Nuclear Information and Resource Service, 1616 P Street, NW, Suite 160, Washington, DC 20036) NRC, 1980, “Emergency planning: Final regulations” Federal Register45 55402 (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC)
50.
NRC/FEMA, 1980Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants NUREG-0654 (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; and Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472)
51.
OreskesM, 1987, “Nuclear plant openings threatened by politics”New York Times 8 February, age 47
52.
OTA, 1983Nuclear Power in an Age of Uncertainty (Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC 20510)
53.
OtwayHJMaurerDThomasK, 1978, “Nuclear power: The question of public acceptance”Futures10109–118
54.
PattersonWC, 1986, “Industry already on ropes feels heat from Chernobyl”Los Angeles Times 6 May, section 2, page 5
55.
PetersonC, 1987, “Reactor shutdown ordered”Washington Post 1 April, page A-1
56.
Price-Anderson Act, 1957, Publ. L. No. 85-256, 71 Stat. 576–579
57.
RudolphRRidleyS, 1986a, “Chernobyl's challenge to anti-nuclear activism”Radical America207–21
58.
RudolphRRidleyS, 1986bPower Struggle: The Hundred Year War Over Electricity (Harper and Row, New York)
59.
SDA, 1982Attitudes Towards Evacuation: Reactions of Long Island Residents to a Possible Accident at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant (Social Data Analysts Inc, Setauket, New York)
60.
SDA, 1987Behavior During a Radiological Emergency: Reactions of EPZ Residents to a Possible Accident at the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station (Social Data Analysts Inc, Setauket, New York)
61.
StammerLB, 1986a, “Chernobyl-like reactor in U.S. to shut down”Los Angeles Times 13 December, pages 1, 36
62.
StammerLB, 1986b, “Safety breach closes A-plant at Hanford”Los Angeles Times 19 October, pages 1, 3, 34
63.
StammerLB, 1987, “Strategic nuclear reactor dealt 2 blows by senators”Los Angeles Times 1 May, page 1
64.
SullivanW, 1986, “Troubled Hanford plant linked to nuclear dawn”New York Times 14 December, page 22
65.
TaylorRE, 1987, “NRC staff mulls licensing plants opposed by states”Wall Street Journal 6 February, page 6
66.
ThurlowS, 1982, “Nuclear war in human perspective: A survivor's report”American Journal of Orthopsychiatry54638–645
67.
WaldML, 1986, “Troubles infest system for making plutonium”New York Times 14 December, pages 1, 14
68.
WaldML, 1987a, “An uneasy feeling about a reactor: Government moves to correct problems at its weapons plants”New York Times 1 February, page 4E
