Local government finance, and in particular the basis of domestic rating, is currently the subject of a major review in Northern Ireland. The authors have conducted empirical research into a comparison between the present rating system and two alternative options—a banded system or a property-specific discrete-value system. Derry City Council is used as a case study to gauge the likely redistributive effects of changes to the system. The findings are seen as significant in describing the effects of each policy regime at a local level in terms of winners and losers. In addition, the impact of the policy options in relation to a measure of income deprivation was investigated. The results indicate that a discrete-value system performs best in terms of minimising the effect of rate redistribution and providing for a more fair and equitable local tax.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirdR MSlackE, (Eds), 2004International Handbook of Land and Property Taxation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
2.
CIPFA, 2005A Guide to Local Government Finance in Northern IrelandChartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, Northern Ireland, 22 East Bridge Street, Belfast B71 3NR.
3.
DavisPMcCluskeyW JLimL C, 2004, “Residential property taxation: A capital value banding approach”Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration1(3) 51–64.
4.
DoE, 1981Alternatives to Domestic RatesDepartment of the Environment, Welsh Office, Scottish Office, Cmnd 8449 (HMSO, London).
5.
DoE, 1983Rates—Proposals for Rate Limitation and Reform of the Rating SystemDepartment of the Environment, Welsh Office, Cmnd 9008 (HMSO, London).
6.
DoE, 1986Paying for Local GovernmentDepartment of the Environment, Scottish Office, Welsh Office, Cmnd 9714 (HMSO, London).
7.
DoE, 1991A New Tax For Local GovernmentDepartment of the Environment, London.
8.
EvansA A, 1976, “Commentary on the effect of changing the basis of rating domestic properties from rateable values to capital values, based on data from a 20 percent sample survey of sales of dwellings”, reported to the Inland Revenue in Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance Cmnd 6453, Layfield Committee (HMSO, London) Appendix 10.
9.
FisherJ DGeltnerD MWebbR B, 1994, “Value indices of commercial real estate: A comparison of index construction methods”The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics9(2) 137–164.
10.
FordR GBrownC J, 1978, “Rating reform and urban structure”Area108–14.
11.
GloudemansR, 1999Mass Appraisal of Real PropertyInternational Association of Assessing Officers, 314 West 10th Street, Kansas City, MI 64105.
12.
HattersleyW MLizieriC MChandlerJ, 1989, “The use of capital values for domestic rating in England and Wales” Research Report, Rating and Valuation Association, London.
13.
HillsJSutherlandH, 1991, “The proposed council tax”Fiscal Studies12(4) 1–21.
IRRV, 1999, “Council Tax collection arrangements in Scotland and England and Wales”Institute of Revenues, Rating and Valuation, Central Research Unit, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.
16.
KeilK AZabelJ E, 1997, “Evaluating the usefulness of the American housing survey for creating house price indexes”The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics14(2) 189–202.
17.
KenwayPPalmerG, 1999Council Tax: The Case for ReformNew Policy Institute, 203 Coppergate House, 16 Brune Street, London E1 7NJ.
18.
LayfieldF, 1976Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance Cmnd 6453 (HMSO, London).
19.
Local Government Finance Act, 1988Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 41 (HMSO, London).
20.
LongleyPHiggsGMartinD, 1996, “The rates revisited? A geographical reassignment of property valuations and local tax burdens under the council tax”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy14101–129.
21.
McCluskeyW J, 1999a, “An empirical investigation into the effects of a change in the basis of the ad valorem residential property tax in Northern Ireland”Property Management17(1) 8–23.
22.
McCluskeyW J, (Ed.), 1999bProperty Tax: An International Comparative Review (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
23.
McCluskeyW JPlimmerFConnellanO, 1998, “Ad valorem property tax: Issues of fairness and equity”The Assessors Journal5(3) 47–55.
24.
McConnellA, 1999The Politics and Policy of Local Taxation in Britain (Tudor Business Publishing, Eastham, Wirral).
25.
McCroneD, 1991, “Excessive and unreasonable: The politics of the poll tax in Scotland”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research15443–452.
26.
MartinDLongleyPHiggsG, 1992, “The geographical incidence of local government revenues: An intraurban case study”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy10253–265.
27.
MidwinterA, 1989, “The politics of local fiscal reform”Public Policy and Administration4(2) 2–9.
28.
MulhollandH, 2005, “Council tax revaluation to be postponed”Guardian Unlimited 15 September, page 10.
29.
NIE, 2002a, “Draft programme for government: Reinvestment and reform”, Northern Ireland Executive, Belfast.
30.
NIE, 2002bA Review of Rating Policy: A Consultation PaperNorthern Ireland Executive, Belfast.
31.
NISRA, 2001Northern Ireland Measures of Multiple DeprivationNorthern Ireland Statistical Research Agency, Belfast.
32.
OrtonM, 2004, “Wealth rich but income poor? Council tax and the relationship between household income and property value” Research Bulletin, Warwick Institute for Employment, Warwick University, Coventry.
33.
PlimmerF, 1999, “The council tax: The need for a revaluation”Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration5(1) 27–39.
34.
PlimmerFMcCluskeyW JConnellanO, 1999, “Reform of UK local government domestic property taxes”Property Management17336–352.
35.
PlimmerFMcCluskeyW JConnellanO, 2000, “Equity and fairness within ad valorem real property taxes”, WP00FP1, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
36.
RidgeMSmithS, 1991Local Taxation: The Options and the ArgumentsInstitute for Fiscal Studies, 7 Ridgmount Street, London WC1E 7AE.
37.
SDRC, 2001Measures of Deprivation in Northern IrelandSocial Disadvantage Research Centre, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford.
38.
SmithSSquireD, 1987, “Local taxes and local government” report series no 25, Institute for Fiscal Studies, 7 Ridgmount Street, London WC1E 7AE.
39.
TownsendP, 1987, “Deprivation”Journal of Social Policy16125–146.
40.
WebbR BMilesMGuilkeyD, 1992, “Transactional-driven commercial real estate returns: The panacea of asset allocation models?”Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association20325–357.
41.
WyattC M, 1983, “The effects of rating reform in Britain: A case study of Derby”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy157–71.
