Using data from a longitudinal study of working-class participants on a youth enterprise start-up programme in the United Kingdom, we examine whether programmes aimed at disadvantaged groups enable parents to combine business trading with childcare responsibilities. Business planning and programme selection practices ignored childcare, rendering it a solely private matter, invisible to public scrutiny. Yet this childcare barrier became both a cause and a consequence of business failure. Participants' experiences of combining trading and childcare varied by gender. All mothers and one father had complex strategies for synchronising trading and childcare responsibilities. However, these strategies soon collapsed, contributing to business closure. Most fathers relied on the childrens' mother to organise and conduct continuous care, but this was dependent on fathers becoming breadwinners through profitable trading which was not achieved. There is growing policy recognition of the importance of the childcare barrier to paid work for lower income families and for self-employed women in the United Kingdom. However, despite recent initiatives, severe constraints remain for working-class parents to start and manage a business. Several implications for policy are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnthiasFMehtiN, 2003, “The intersection between gender, the family and self-employment: The family as a resource”International Review of Sociology13 (1) 105–116
2.
BainesSWheelockJGelderU, 2003Riding the Roller Coaster: Family Life and Self-employment (Policy Press, Bristol)
3.
BaldockJHadlowJ, 2004, “Managing the family: Productivity, scheduling and the male veto”Social Policy and Administration38706–720
BasuAAltinayE, 2003Family and Work in Minority Ethnic Businesses (Policy Press, Bristol)
6.
BaxterJ, 2000, “The joys and justice of housework”Sociology34609–631
7.
BellALa ValleI, 2003Combining Self-employment and Family Life (Policy Press, Bristol)
8.
BockB, 2004, “Fitting in and multi-tasking: Dutch farm women's strategies in rural entrepreneurship”Sociologia Ruralis44245–260
9.
BradleyFBolesK, 2003“Female entrepreneurs from ethnic backgrounds: an exploration of motivations and barriers”, Manchester Metropolitan University Business School working paper, Manchester
DeMartinoRBarbatoR, 2003, “Differences between women and men MBA entrepreneurs: Exploring family flexibility and wealth creation as career motivators”Journal of Business Venturing18815–832
FraserS, 1004Finance for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Report of the 2004 UK Survey of SME FinancesCentre for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry
18.
GershunyJGodwinMJonesS, 1994, “The domestic labour revolution: A Process of lagged adaption?”, in Social and Political Economy of the HouseholdAndersonMBechhoferFGershunyJ (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 151–197
19.
GlaserB G, 1997Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory (University of California Press, San Francisco, CA)
20.
HillsJStewartK, 2004A More Equal Society? New Labour, Poverty, Inequality and Social Exclusion (Policy Press, Bristol)
21.
HM Treasury, 2004aOpportunity for All: The Strength to Take the Long-term Decisions for Britain (Pre-Budget Report 2004)The Stationery Office, London
London Development Agency, 2005Sustaining Success: Developing London's EconomyLondon Development Agency, Devon House, 58–60 St Katharine's Way, London E1W 1JX
26.
LoscoccoKSmith-HunterA, 2004, “Women home-based business owners: Insights from comparative analyses”Women in Management Review19 (3) 164–173
MeagerNBatesPDowlingM, 2003Business Start-up Support for Young People Delivered by The Prince's Trust: A Comparative Study of Labour Market Outcomes report for the Department for Work and Pensions (The Stationery Office, London)
29.
MellorC, 2005, “Counting the cost of sexism”The Guardian 9th January
30.
MilesM BHubermanA M, 1994Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
31.
OECD, 2003, “Women's entrepreneurship: issues and policies”, Working Party on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Entrepreneurship, OECD, Paris
32.
OECD, 2004Babies and Bosses—Reconciling Work and Family Life (Volume 3): New Zealand, Portugal and SwitzerlandOECD, Paris
33.
OECD, 2005Local Economic and Employment Development Entrepreneurship: A Catalyst for Urban RegenerationOECD, Paris
RosaP, 2003, “Hardly likely to make the Japanese tremble: The businesses of recently graduated university and college ‘entrepreneurs’”International Small Business Journal21435–459
36.
RouseJ, 2004Enterprise, Identity and Structure: A Longitudinal Study of Youth Enterprise Experiences PhD thesis, Business School, Kingston University, Kingston-Upon-Thames
37.
RouseJBolesK, 2004“New entrepreneur scholarships: delivering the action plan for small business?”, paper presented to the 27th International Small Business Affairs Conference, Newcastle, November; copy available from the author
38.
SBS, 2003A Strategic Framework for Women's Enterprise Small Business Service (The Stationery Office, London)
39.
SBS, 2004A Government Action Plan for Small Business Small Business Service (The Stationery Office, London)
40.
SkinnerC, 1999Running Around in Circles: Co-ordinating Childcare, Education and Work (Policy Press, Bristol)
41.
StoreyD, 2003, “Entrepreneurship, small and medium sized enterprises and public policies”, in Handbook of Entrepreneurial Research Eds AcsZAudretschD (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA)
42.
SullivanCLewisS, 2001, “Home-based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: Perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents”Gender, Work and Organization8 (2) 123–145
43.
WilliamsD, 2004, “Effects of childcare activities on the duration of self-employment in Europe”Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice28467–485
