This paper explores the role of coalition building in the implementation of renewable-energy policy. Applying a discourse analysis framework to wind-energy development in the North West of England, two strong coalitions operating within the wind-energy development arena were identified. By combining this framework with a multicriteria assessment, it is revealed that each coalition had very different priorities during the evaluation of wind-energy schemes. Overall, only when offshore wind is evaluated are there elements of common ground. This technology therefore appears to offer a solution to sharp contrasts in discourse. Based on this assessment, it is concluded that the implementation of national energy-policy objectives is contingent upon the regional government developing coherent storylines to attract the support of as broad a coalition of stakeholders as possible.
BulkeleyH, 2000, “Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18727–748
6.
CCC, 2002, “Consultation on the structure plan”, Schedule of Comments, Planning, Cumbria County Council, The Courts, Carlisle, Cumbria
7.
DEFRA, 2000, “Climate change—the UK programme”, Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Rural Affairs (The Stationery Office, London)
8.
DodgsonJSpackmanMPearmanAPhillipsL, 2000Multi Criteria Analysis: A ManualDepartment of Transport Local Government and the Regions, London
9.
DTI, Department of Trade and Industry (The Stationery Office, London)
10.
1999Analysis of the Responses to the Government Renewable Energy Consultation
11.
2003Our Energy Future—Creating a Low Carbon Economy
12.
DTLGR, 2001, “Planning: Delivering a fundamental change”, Planning Green Paper, Department of Transport Local Government and the Regions, London
13.
ESRU, 2004, “Citizens and specialists deliberate options for managing the UK's legacy intermediate and high level radio-active waste: A report of the Deliberative Mapping Trial”, June/July, revised interim report submitted to CoRWM PSE Working Group, 31st August, Environment and Society Research Unit, Department of Geography, University College London
14.
FoE, 1995Planning for Wind Power, Guidelines for Project Developers and Local Planners (Friends of the Earth, London)
15.
GONW, 2001, “Renewable energy in North West England: Investigating the potential and developing the targets”, Government Office for the North West, Cunard Building, Pier Head, Water St, Liverpool L3 1QB
16.
GoughCShackleySCannellM G R, 2002, “Evaluating the options for carbon sequestration”, Tyndall Centre Technical Report No. 2, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Zukerman Institute, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich
17.
HajerM, 1995The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
18.
HobbsB FMeierP, 2000Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multi-criteria Methods (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht)
19.
House of Commons, 1994Wind Energy Comes of Age (HMSO, London)
20.
JacksonTLofstedtR, 1998, “Renewable energy sources”, background report for the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, London
21.
Jenkins-SmithHSabatierP, 1994, “Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework”Journal of Public Policy14175–203
LoringJ A M, 2005Wind Energy Development in England, Wales and Denmark: The Role of Community Participation and Network Stability in Project Acceptance and Planning Issues PhD thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton
24.
ManderS L, 2003Integrated Assessment of Wind Energy: A Multi-criteria Analysis of Wind Energy Coalitions in the North West of England PhD thesis, UMIST, Manchester
25.
MarshDRhodesR A W, 1992Policy Networks in British Government (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
26.
MitchellC, 1996, “Future support of renewable energy in the UK—options and merits”Energy and Environment7267–283
27.
MitchellC, 2000, “The England and Wales non-fossil fuel obligation: History and lessons”Annual Review of Energy and Environment25285–312
28.
NWDA, 2003, “North West energy cluster mapping & action plan development”, final report, North West Development Agency, Centre Park, Warrington, Cheshire
29.
NWRA, 2000a, “People, places and prosperity”, draft regional planning guidance for the North West, North West Regional Assembly, Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan
30.
NWRA, 2000b, “Action for sustainability”, Regional Sustainable Development Framework, North West Regional Assembly, Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA
31.
NWRA, 2004, “Advancing sustainable energy in the North West—mapping a way forward to 2020”, final report, North West Regional Assembly, Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA
32.
Oldham MBC, 2003, “Renewable energy topic paper”, Oldham's Replacement Unitary Development Plan, Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council, Oldham
33.
O'RiordanTJordanA, 1996, “Social institutions and climate change”, in Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective Eds O'RiordanTJagerJ, (Routledge, London) pp 65–106
RBA, 2002, “Lambrigg Windfarm public attitudes survey”, RBA Research Ltd, 172–174 Harrogate Road, Leeds LS7 4NZ
36.
RinglandG, 1998Scenario Planning: Managing for the Future (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
37.
SabatierP, 1998, “The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe”Journal of European Public Policy598–130
38.
SECRU, 2000, “Public attitudes towards wind farms in Scotland: Results of a residents survey”, Scottish Executive Central Research Unit, Edinburgh
39.
ShackleySFlemingPBulkeleyH, 2002, “Low carbon spaces area based carbon emission reduction: A scoping study—a report to the Sustainable Development Commission”, The Sustainable Development Commission, London
40.
SmithA, 1997Integrated Pollution Control: Change and Continuity in the Industrial Pollution Policy Network (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
41.
SNW, 2001, “From power to prosperity: Advancing renewable energy in northwest England”, Sustainability North West, Manchester
42.
StewartT JScottL, 1995, “A scenario based framework for multi-criteria analysis in water resources planning”Water Resources Research312835–2843
43.
StirlingAMayerS, 1999, “A pilot multi-criteria mapping of a genetically modified crop in agricultural systems in the UK”, Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Brighton
44.
StirlingAMayerS, 2001, “A novel approach to the appraisal of technological risk: A multicriteria mapping study of a genetically modified crop”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19529–555
45.
StreetP, 1997, “Scenario workshops: A participatory approach to sustainable urban living?”Futures29139–158
46.
TokeD, 2005, “Explaining wind power planning outcomes: Some findings from a study in England and Wales”Energy Policy331527–1539
47.
UpretiB R, 2004, “Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: Some observations and lessons from England and Wales”Energy Policy32785–800
